Do social ties between two signatory auditors affect audit quality and firm value?

References

• Amir, E., Guan, Y., and Livne, G., 2019. Abnormal fees and timely loss recognition—a long-term perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38 (3), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. E., and Williams, L. J., 1996. Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (3), 282–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aobdia, D., 2019. Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 67 (1), 144–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., and Shivakumar, L., 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 39 (1), 83–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A., 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 (6), 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T. N., and Green, S. G., 1996. Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 1538–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, N., Ecker, F., Olsson, P. M., and Schipper, K., 2012. Direct and mediated associations among earnings quality, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. The Accounting Review, 87 (2), 449–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. J., and Warner, J. B., 1985. Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1), 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S., 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameran, M., Ditillo, A., and Pettinicchio, A., 2018. Audit team attributes matter: how diversity affects audit quality. The European Accounting Review, 27 (4), 595–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., and Simpson, W. G., 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38 (1), 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K., and Wu, D., 2011. Aggregate quasi rents and auditor independence: evidence from audit firm mergers in china. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28 (1), 175–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. Z., Chen, M. H., Chin, C. L., and Lobo, G. J., 2020. Do firms that have a common signing auditor exhibit higher earnings comparability? The Accounting Review, 95 (3), 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. Y., Lin, C. J., and Lin, Y. C., 2008. Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (2), 415–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Sun, S. Y., and Wu, D., 2010. Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: an office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review, 85 (1), 127–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Huang, J. U. N., Li, T., and Pittman, J., 2021. It’s a small world: the importance of social connections with auditors to mutual fund managers’ portfolio decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 60, 901–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C. L., and Chi, H. Y., 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26 (3), 729–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2020a). Chinese Audit Firm Quality Control Standard No.5101: Engagement Quality Control. (In Chinese). Beijing, People’s Republic of China: CICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2020b). Code of Ethics for Certified Public Accountants in China No.1: Basic principles of ethics (In Chinese). Beijing, People’s Republic of China: CICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. H., Kim, C., Kim, J. B., and Zang, Y., 2010. Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29 (1), 73–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. S., and Mils, J., 1993. The difference between communal and exchange relationships: what it is and is not. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 (6), 684–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. A., and Zarowin, P., 2010. Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 50 (1), 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., and Malloy, C., 2008. The small world of investing: board connections and mutual fund returns. The Journal of Political Economy, 116 (5), 951–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., and Malloy, C., 2010. Sell-side school ties. The Journal of Finance (New York), 65 (4), 1409–1437.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., and Reutzel, C. R., 2011. Signaling theory: a review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37 (1), 39–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, H., Leung, T. K. P., Luk, S. T. K., and Wong, Y.-h., 1995. The benefits of “Guanxi”: the value of relationships in developing the Chinese market. Industrial Marketing Management, 24 (3), 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P. M., and Dichev, I. D., 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77 (s-1), 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., and Subramanyam, K. R., 2002. Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (4), 1247–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., and Zhang, J., 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 58 (2-3), 275–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downar, B., Ernstberger, J., and Koch, C., 2021a. Determinants and consequences of auditor dyad formation at the top level of audit teams. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 89, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downar, B., Ernstberger, J., and Koch, C., 2021b. Who makes partner in Big 4 audit firms? – Evidence from Germany. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 91, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., 2019. Does CEO-auditor dialect sharing impair pre-IPO audit quality? Evidence from china. Journal of Business Ethics, 156 (3), 699–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunfee, T. W., and Warren, D. E., 2001. Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in china. Journal of Business Ethics, 32 (3), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, P. D. 2004. PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review, 79 (1), 73–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J. P. H., and Wong, T. J., 2005. Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from east Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43 (1), 35–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, X., He, K., Meng, Y., and Ye, J., 2022. Supervision or collusion? CEO–CFO social ties and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 44 (2/3), 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fracassi, C., and Tate, G., 2012. External networking and internal firm governance. The Journal of Finance (New York), 67 (1), 153–194.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B., Hasan, I., Liu, L., Wu, Q., and Zhao, Y., 2021. Financial analysts’ career concerns and the cost of private debt. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., 2011. A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30 (2), 125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., 2023. Going big, going small: a perspective on strategies for researching audit quality. The British Accounting Review, 55 (2), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., and Yu, M. D., 2009. Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84 (5), 1521–1552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A., and Moon, D., 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review, 80 (2), 585–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M., 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M., 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1), 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, Y., Su, L., Wu, D., and Yang, Z., 2016. Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes? Journal of Accounting & Economics, 61 (2-3), 506–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., and Saffar, W., 2014. Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52 (1), 107–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunschild, P. R., and Beckman, C. M., 1998. When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (4), 815–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., Li, C. K., Monroe, G. S., and Si, Y., 2021. Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 40 (3), 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., Pittman, J. A., Rui, O. M., and Wu, D., 2017. Do social ties between external auditors and audit committee members affect audit quality? The Accounting Review, 92 (5), 61–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., Pittman, J. A., Sun, S., and Wu, D., 2019, June 1. A tale of two intermediaries: investment banker–auditor social ties and IPO audit quality. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3428007.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47 (1), 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E., and Weisbach, M. S., 2003. Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9 (1), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, S., Yazawa, K., and Monroe, G. S., 2017. The relationship between audit team composition, audit fees, and quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 36 (3), 115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T. C., Chen, C., Kaplan, S. E., and Lin, Y. H., 2021. Audit partners’ co-working experience and audit outcomes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 40 (2), 133–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. B., 1979. A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch’ing and Kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly (London), 78, 237–273.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. B., 1982. The concept of guanxi and local politics in a rural Chinese cultural setting. In: Greenblatt L. Sidney, Wilson W. Richard, and Wilson Amy Auerbacher, eds. Social Interaction in Chinese Society, New York: Praeger, 209–236.
   Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier, S. J., and Van Landuyt, B. W., 2017. Prompting the benefit of the doubt: the joint effect of auditor-client social bonds and measurement uncertainty on audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research, 55 (4), 963–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallunki, J., Kallunki, J. P., Niemi, L., and Nilsson, H., 2019. IQ and audit quality: do smarter auditors deliver better audits? Contemporary Accounting Research, 36 (3), 1373–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M., and Watts, R. L., 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 48 (2), 132–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, V., Kim, E. H., and Lu, Y. A. O., 2015. CEO connectedness and corporate fraud. The Journal of Finance (New York), 70 (3), 1203–1252.
   Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., and Zerni, M., 2015. Does the identity of engagement partners matter? An analysis of audit partner reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32 (4), 1443–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, K., Li, L., Liu, X., and Wang, C., 2023. The effect of audit partner diversity on audit quality: evidence from China. Abacus, 59 (1), 340–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., Justesen, L., and Mouritsen, J., 2011. When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you”: an ethnography of managers in a Big 4 accounting firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36 (8), 514–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., and Wasley, C. E., 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 39 (1), 163–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D., and Stern, R. N., 1988. Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51 (2), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, Y. F., Liu, X. K., Paruchuri, S., and Qin, B., 2022. CFO social ties to non-CEO senior managers and financial restatements. Accounting and Business Research, 52 (2), 115–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S. Y., and Yi, H. S., 2018. Do social ties between CEOs and engagement audit partners affect audit quality and audit fees? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 37 (2), 139–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., and Rusticus, T. O., 2010. On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 49 (3), 186–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C., Wang, C., and Wu, X. I., 2020. Opening up the “black box” of audit firms: the effects of audit partner ownership on audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research, 58 (5), 1299–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., and Filer, L., 2007. The effects of the governance environment on the choice of investment mode and the strategic implications. Journal of World Business: JWB, 42 (1), 80–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B., 1977. Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20 (2), 159–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Wang, Y., and Wu, L., 2011. The effect of guanxi on audit quality in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 103 (4), 621–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M., 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (1), 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, K., and Williams, D. D., 2004. Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 79 (4), 1095–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance of China. 2001. Instructions on Issues Related to Signing of Audit Reports by Certified Public Accountants. (In Chinese). Beijing, People’s Republic of China: MOF.
   Google Scholar
• Morck, R., and Yeung, B., 2003. Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 367–382.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S., 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. W., 2006. Ameliorating conflicts of interest in auditing: effects of recent reforms on auditors and their clients. The Academy of Management Review, 31 (1), 30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, N. J., Persellin, J. S., Wang, D., and Wilkins, M. S., 2016. Internal control opinion shopping and audit market competition. The Accounting Review, 91 (2), 603–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B. D., 2012. Does the rolodex matter? Corporate elite’s small world and the effectiveness of boards of directors. Management Science, 58 (2), 236–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, F. M., Locatelli, L. G., Azevedo, G., and Costa, C. M. 2023. The effect of social ties between the CEO and board of directors and fiscal council's members on earnings management. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13 (3), 613–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. M., 1940. Community of values as a factor in friendships of college and adult women. Journal of Social Psychology, 36 (2), 680–682.
   Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42 (3), 335–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seraj Aksit, M., and Toker, A., 2011. Social network citizenship. In: Cruz-Cunha and Maria Manuela, eds. Handbook of Research on Business Social Networking: Organizational, Managerial, and Technological Dimensions, Hershey, Pennsylvania, The United State: IGI Global, 339–357.
   Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A., 1980. The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (1), 161–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standifird, S. S., and Marshall, R. S., 2000. The transaction cost advantage of guanxi-based business practices. Journal of World Business: JWB, 35 (1), 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., 1970. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223 (5), 96–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24927662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Y., Xiao, J., Zeng, C., and Zou, H., 2021. What's in a name? The valuation effect of directors’ sharing of surnames. Journal of Banking & Finance, 122, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, E. W. K., 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? The Academy of Management Executive (1993), 12 (2), 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., and Tajfel, H., 1979. Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9 (2), 187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B., 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 61 (4), 674–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B., and Amit, R., 2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2), 385–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, K. K., and Pearce, J. L., 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 1641–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, I. Y. M., and Tung, R. L., 1996. Achieving business success in Confucian societies: the importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25 (2), 54–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, A. Y., 2012. Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87 (2), 675–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellner, A., and Theil, H., 1962. Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica, 30 (1), 54–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., 2012. Audit partner specialization and audit fees: some evidence from Sweden: audit partner specialization and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29 (1), 312–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar