The use of institutional theory in social and environmental accounting research: a critical review

References

• Adams, C.A., and Larrinaga-González, C, 2007. Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20 (3), 333–355.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C.A., and Larrinaga-González, C, 2019. Progress: engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (8), 2367–2394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, C.A., Potter, B., Singh, P.J., and York, J, 2016. Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review, 48 (3), 283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albu, N., Albu, C.N., Apostol, O., and Cho, C.H., 2021. The past is never dead: the role of imprints in shaping social and environmental reporting in a post-communist context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (5), 1109–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Dosari, M., Marques, A., and Fairbrass, J, 2023. The effect of the EU’s directive on non-financial disclosures of the oil and gas industry. Accounting Forum, 47 (2), 166–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and Sandberg, J, 2020. The problematizing review: a counterpoint to Elsbach and van Knippenberg’s argument for integrative reviews. Journal of Management Studies, 57 (6), 1290–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amis, J., Munir, K., and Mair, J. 2017. Institutions and economic inequality. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T.B. Lawrence, and R.E. Meyer, eds. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 705–736.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, J., and Baker, M, 2020. Corporate social responsibility reporting: the last 40 years and a path to sharing future insights. Abacus, 56 (1), 35–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archel, P., Husillos, J., and Spence, C, 2011. The institutionalisation of unaccountability: loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36 (6), 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Gray, R., and Schaltegger, S, 2023. Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36 (2), 591–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, M., Maso, L.D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., and Terzani, S, 2018. Role of country- and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150 (1), 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, A., and Craig, R, 2010. Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21 (4), 283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and D’Aunno, T., 2009. Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In: T.B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, and B. Leca, eds. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31–58.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., and Boxenbaum, E, 2009. How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3 (1), 65–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., and Frame, B, 2009. Initiating sustainable development reporting: evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (4), 588–625.
   Google Scholar
• Beddewela, E., and Herzig, C, 2013. Corporate social reporting by MNCs’ subsidiaries in Sri Lanka. Accounting Forum, 37 (2), 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Amar, W., Comyns, B., and Martinez, I, 2023. The COVID-19 pandemic: opportunity or challenge for climate change risk disclosure? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36 (2), 649–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigoni, M., and Mohammed, S, 2023. Critique is unsustainable: a polemic. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 97, 102555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouten, L., and Everaert, P, 2015. Social and environmental reporting in Belgium: ‘Pour vivre heureux, vivons cachés’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 24–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briem, C.R., and Wald, A, 2018. Implementing third-party assurance in integrated reporting: companies’ motivation and auditors’ role. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31 (5), 1461–1485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, B., Wang, Z.(A)., and Tekathen, M., 2024. Carbon toolmaking: responding to multiple interacting logics in carbon management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37 (1), 227–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campopiano, G., and De Massis, A., 2015. Corporate social responsibility reporting: a content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129 (3), 511–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, M., and Turcotte, M.B., 2009. Path dependence and path creation: framing the extra-financial information market for a sustainable trajectory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (2), 272–297.
   Google Scholar
• Cerbone, D., and Maroun, W, 2020. Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: insights using an institutional logics framework. The British Accounting Review, 52 (3), 100876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakhovich, T., and Virtanen, T, 2021. Accountability for sustainability – an institutional entrepreneur as the representative of future stakeholders. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 91, 102399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatelain-Ponroy, S., and Morin-Delerm, S, 2016. Adoption of sustainable development reporting by universities: an analysis of French first-time reporters. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29 (5), 887–918.
   Google Scholar
• Chelli, M., Durocher, S., and Richard, J, 2014. France’s new economic regulations: insights from institutional legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27 (2), 283–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.C., and Roberts, R.W., 2010. Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization-society relationship: a theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 651–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, K.L., 2014. Water management accounting and the wine supply chain: empirical evidence from Australia. The British Accounting Review, 46 (4), 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, K.L., Rao, K.K., and Burritt, R.L., 2019. Accounting for modern slavery: an analysis of Australian listed company disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (3), 836–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S, 2010. The state, power, and agency: missing in action in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementino, E., and Perkins, R, 2021. How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 171 (2), 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clune, C., and O’Dwyer, B, 2020. Organizing dissonance through institutional work: the embedding of social and environmental accountability in an investment field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 85, 101130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comyns, B, 2016. Determinants of GHG reporting: an analysis of global oil and gas companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 136 (2), 349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comyns, B, 2018. Climate change reporting and multinational companies: insights from institutional theory and international business. Accounting Forum, 42 (1), 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contrafatto, M, 2014. The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: an Italian narrative. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39 (6), 414–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contrafatto, M., 2022. Accounting for sustainability: insights from the institutional logics perspective. In: C. Adams, ed. Handbook of Accounting and Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 110–134.
   Google Scholar
• Contrafatto, M., and Burns, J, 2013. Social and environmental accounting, organisational change and management accounting: a processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24 (4), 349–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contrafatto, M., Costa, E., and Pesci, C, 2019. Examining the dynamics of SER evolution: an institutional understanding. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (6), 1771–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contrafatto, M., Ferguson, J., Power, D., Stevenson, L., and Collison, D, 2020. Understanding power-related strategies and initiatives: the case of the European commission green paper on CSR. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33 (3), 559–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.J., Ezzamel, M., and Willmott, H., 2008. Examining ‘institutionalization’: a critical theoretic perspective. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 673–701.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., Parkes, C., and Blewitt, J, 2014. Can accreditation help a leopard change its spots?: social accountability and stakeholder engagement in business schools. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27 (2), 234–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, D., Magnan, M., and Van Velthoven, B., 2005. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14 (1), 3–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, M.T., Goodstein, J., and Scott, W.R., 2002. Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special issue. Academy of Management Journals, 45 (1), 45­–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Aguiar, T.R.S., and Bebbington, J., 2014. Disclosure on climate change: analysing the UK ETS effects. Accounting Forum, 38 (4), 227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C, 2002. The legitimating effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (3), 282–311.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C, 2006. Financial Accounting Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C, 2017. Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives on Accounting: hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C, 2019. Legitimacy theory: despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32 (8), 2307–2329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R., Helfen, M., Pekarek, A., Schuessler, E., and Zietsma, C, 2024. Organizing sustainably: introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 45 (1), 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derchi, G.-B., Davila, A., and Oyon, D, 2023. Green incentives for environmental goals. Management Accounting Research, 59, 100830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descalzo, N., Bebbington, J., and Larrinaga, C, 2023. Socio-ecological perspectives on accounting in the Anthropocene: a scientific/intellectual movement analysis. Working paper, University of Burgos.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers, C., and Alexander, D., 2014. The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The British Accounting Review, 46 (2), 198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J., 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: L.G. Zucker, ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge: Ballinger, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J., and Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional Isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drori, G.S., 2020. Hasn’t institutional theory always been critical? Organization Theory, 1, 1­–19.
   Google Scholar
• Edgley, C., Jones, M.J., and Atkins, J, 2015. The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: a field study approach. The British Accounting Review, 47 (1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, M, 2014. Progress towards institutionalising field-wide water efficiency change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27 (5), 809–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., and Saleh, A, 2021. ESG practices and the cost of debt: evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K.D., and van Knippenberg, D., 2020. Creating high-impact literature reviews: an argument for ‘integrative reviews’. Journal of Management Studies, 57 (6), 1277–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, M.B., and de Villiers, C., 2019a. The shaping of sustainability assurance through the competition between accounting and non-accounting providers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (1), 307–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, M.B., and de Villiers, C., 2019b. Understanding how managers institutionalise sustainability reporting: evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (5), 1240–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, M.B., and de Villiers, C., 2020. How sustainability assurance engagement scopes are determined, and its impact on capture and credibility enhancement. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33 (2), 417–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdous, M., Adams, C.A., and Boyce, G, 2019. Institutional drivers of environmental management accounting adoption in public sector water organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (4), 984–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., and Alford, R.R., 1991. Bringing society back in: symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In: W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 232–263.
   Google Scholar
• Gaia, S., and Jones, M.J., 2020. Biodiversity reporting for governmental organisations: evidence from English local councils. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33 (1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibassier, D, 2017. From écobilan to LCA: the elite’s institutional work in the creation of an environmental management accounting tool. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 42, 36–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibassier, D., El Omari, S., and Naccache, P, 2020. Institutional work in the birth of a carbon accounting profession. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33 (6), 1447–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M.A., and D’Aunno, T., 2023. An intellectual history of institutional theory: looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 17 (1), 301­–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R, 2002. The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27 (7), 687–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Adams, C., and Owen, D., 2018. Social and environmental accounting. In: R. Roslender, ed., The Routledge Companion to Critical Accounting. London: Routledge, 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., and Milne, M, 2015. It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it? Of methods and madness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 32, 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Owen, D., and Adams, C, 2010. Some theories for social accounting: a review essay and a tentative pedagogical categorisation of theorisation around social accounting. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 4, 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T.B., and Meyer, R.E., 2017. Introduction: into the fourth decade. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T.B. Lawrence, and R.E. Meyer, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, A.R., and Lounsbury, M, 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J.J., and Youm, Y.N., 2018. Voluntarily disclosing prosocial behaviors in Korean firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 153 (4), 1017–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüsay, A.A., Claus, L., and Amis, J, 2020. Engaging with grand challenges: an institutional logics perspective. Organization Theory, 1 (3), 2631787720960487.
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, C.E., Lawrence, T.B., and Tracey, P., 2017. Institutional work: taking stock and making it matter. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T.B. Lawrence, and R.E. Meyer, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 558–590.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, F., and Jones, M.J., 2020. European firms’ corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016. The British Accounting Review, 52 (2), 100893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., and Maguire, S., 2008. Institutional entrepreneurship. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 198–217.
   Google Scholar
• Haveman, H.A., and Rao, H., 1997. Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1606–1651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heggen, C., Sridharan, V., and Subramaniam, N, 2018. To the letter vs the spirit: a case analysis of contrasting environmental management responses. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31 (2), 478–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heugens, P.P.M.A.R., and Lander, M.W., 2009. Structure! agency! (and other quarrels): a meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (1), 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebl, M.R.W., 2023a. Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, 26 (2), 229–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebl, M.R.W., 2023b. Literature reviews of qualitative accounting research: challenges and opportunities. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 20 (3), 309–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, C., Stubbs, W., and Love, T, 2014. Walking the talk(s): organisational narratives of integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27 (7), 1090–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, C., Stubbs, W., and Milne, M, 2018. Is sustainability reporting becoming institutionalised? The role of an issues-based field. Journal of Business Ethics, 147 (2), 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P.M., and Lounsbury, M., 1997. Ending the family quarrel: toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (4), 406–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P., and Lounsbury, M., 2015. Toward a more critical and “powerful” institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24 (1), 96–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, P, 1995. The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3), 398–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., O’Dwyer, B., and Unerman, J, 2017. Re-theorizing the configuration of organizational fields: the IIRC and the pursuit of ‘Enlightened’ corporate reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 47 (1), 30–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husillos, J, 2023. Is critique sustainable? A commentary on Bigoni and Mohammed Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 97, 102603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M.A., and McPhail, K, 2011. Regulating for corporate human rights abuses: the emergence of corporate reporting on the ILO’s human rights standards within the global garment manufacturing and retail industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22 (8), 790–810.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M., and Deegan, C, 2008. Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21 (6), 850–874.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, H.Z., Bose, S., and Johns, R, 2020. Regulatory influences on CSR practices within banks in an emerging economy: do banks merely comply? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 71, 102096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreander, N., and McPhail, K, 2019. State investments and human rights? The case of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (6), 1742–1770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreander, N., McPhail, K., and Beattie, V, 2015. Charity ethical investments in Norway and the UK: a comparative institutional analysis including the impact of a sovereign wealth fund. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28 (4), 581–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrinaga, C., and Bebbington, J, 2021. The pre-history of sustainability reporting: a constructivist reading. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (9), 162–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrinaga, C., Rossi, A., Luque-Vilchez, M., and Núñez-Nickel, M, 2020. Institutionalization of the contents of sustainability assurance services: a comparison between Italy and United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 163 (1), 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrinaga-González, C., 2007. Sustainability reporting: insights from neoinstitutional theory. In: J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, and B. O’Dwyer, eds. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. London: Routledge, 150–167.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T.B., 2008. Power, institutions and organizations. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 170–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T.B., and Buchanan, S., 2017. Power, institutions and organizations. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T.B. Lawrence, and R.E. Meyer, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 477–506.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T.B., Leca, B., and Zilber, T, 2013. Institutional work: current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34, 1023–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T.B., and Suddaby, R., 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In: S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence, and W.R. Nord, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 215–254.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T.B., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B., 2009. Introduction: theorizing and studying institutional work. In: T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, and B. Leca, eds. Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B, 2011. Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20 (1), 52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, S., and Hazelton, J, 2019. Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (3), 811–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., and Belal, A, 2018. Authoritarian state, global expansion and corporate social responsibility reporting: the narrative of a Chinese state-owned enterprise. Accounting Forum, 42 (2), 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., Hidayah, N.N., Lyu, O., and Lowe, A, 2023. Navigational space for the absence of sustainability assurance in China. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36 (5), 1221–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lok, J, 2019. Why (and how) institutional theory can be critical: addressing the challenge to institutional theory’s critical turn. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28 (3), 335–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopatta, K., Tideman, S.A., Scheil, C., and Makarem, N, 2023. The current state of corporate human rights disclosure of the global top 500 business enterprises: measurement and determinants. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 96, 102512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M, 2002. Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalisation of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., 2003. The problem of order revisited: towards a more critical institutional perspective. In: R. Westwood and S. Clegg, eds. Debating Organization. Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies. London: Blackwell, 208–2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M, 2007. A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M, 2008. Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (4–5), 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., Steele, C.W.J., Wang, M.S., and Toubiana, M, 2021. New directions in the study of institutional logics: from tools to phenomena. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 261–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., and Ventresca, M, 2003. The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization, 10, 457–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., and Wang, M.S., 2020. Into the clearing: back to the future of constitutive institutional analysis. Organization Theory, 1 (1), 2631787719891173.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Z., and Uddin, S, 2021. Institutional logics and practice variations in sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging field. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (5), 1163–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., and Lounsbury, M, 2007. Vive la resistance: competing logics and consolidation in US community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (4), 799–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., and Rowan, B, 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 440–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon, G, 2021. Accounting research boundaries, multiple centers and academic empathy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 76, 102204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M.Z., and Fein, L.C., 1999. The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (4), 653–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S, 2015. Making institutional accounting research critical: dead end or new beginning? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28 (5), 773–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S, 2022a. Accounting for institutional work: a critical review. European Accounting Review, 31 (1), 33–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S, 2022b. Is institutional research on management accounting degenerating or progressing? A Lakatosian analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39 (4), 2560–2595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momin, M.A., and Parker, L.D., 2013. Motivations for corporate social responsibility reporting by MNC subsidiaries in an emerging country: the case of Bangladesh. The British Accounting Review, 45 (3), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D.R.J., 2013. Sustainability, institutionalization and the duality of structure: contradiction and unintended consequences in the political context of an Australian water business. Management Accounting Research, 24 (4), 366–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir, K.A., 2015. The loss of power in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 90–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir, K.A., 2020. Challenging institutional theory’s critical credentials. Organization Theory, 1, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, V., and Adams, C.A., 2017. Transformative change towards sustainability: the interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practices. Accounting and Business Research, 47 (3), 344–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A, 2010. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (4), 611–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B., 2021. Theorising environmental accounting and reporting. In: J. Bebbington, C. Larrinaga, B. O’Dwyer, and I. Thomson, eds., Routledge Handbook of Environmental Accounting. London: Routledge, 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, B., and Unerman, J, 2016. Fostering rigour in accounting for social sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 49, 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., McDonald, G., and Deegan, C.M., 2015. Lost in translation: institutionalised logic and the problematisation of accounting for injury. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28 (2), 180–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W., Thornton, P.H., and Lounsbury, M., 2017. Advances to the institutional logics perspective. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T.B. Lawrence, and R.E. Meyer, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 509–531.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, N., and O’Dwyer, B, 2015. The structuration of issue-based fields: social accountability, social movements and the equator principles issue-based field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 33–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C, 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C, 1992. The antecedents of de-institutionalization. Organization Studies, 13 (4), 563–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, L.D., 2005. Social and environmental accountability research: a view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18 (6), 842–860.
   Google Scholar
• Parsa, S., Dai, N., Belal, A., Li, T., and Tang, G, 2021. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: political, social and corporate influences. Accounting and Business Research, 51 (1), 36–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, D.M., 2015. An insider’s reflection on quantitative research in the social and environmental disclosure domain. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 32, 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perego, P., and Kolk, A, 2012. Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: the evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110 (2), 173–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Batres, L.A., Miller, V.V., and Pisani, M.J., 2010. CSR, sustainability and the meaning of global reporting for Latin American corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 91 (S2), 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Phillips, N., and Greenwood, R, 2022. Institutional arbitrage: how actors exploit institutional difference. Organization Theory, 3, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, W., Burritt, R., and Monroe, G, 2011. Environmental management accounting in local government: a case of waste management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24 (1), 93–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, W., Tilt, C., and Belal, A, 2021. Social and environmental accounting in developing countries: contextual challenges and insights. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (5), 1021–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahaman, A.S., Lawrence, S., and Roper, J, 2004. Social and environmental reporting at the VRA: institutionalised legitimacy or legitimation crisis? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15 (1), 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and Hinings, C.R., 2009. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and Jones, C, 2016. Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organization, 14 (4), 441–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K., and Ezzamel, M, 2023. The cultural fields of accounting practices: institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 104, 101379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, T., Burchell, J., and Cook, J, 2023. Playing to the audience? Multilevel interactions between stakeholders and institutions around CSR in Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36 (2), 464–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Lozano, M., De Vicente-Lama, M., Tirado-Valencia, P., and Cordobés-Madueño, M., 2022. The disclosure of the materiality process in sustainability reporting by Spanish state-owned enterprises. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35 (2), 385–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo-Spena, T., Tregua, M., and De Chiara, A., 2018. Trends and drivers in CSR disclosure: a focus on reporting practices in the automotive industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 151 (2), 563–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeh, L.J., and Zilber, T.B., 2019. Bringing “together”: emotions and power in organizational responses to institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 62 (5), 1413–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari, M., and Parker, L.D., in press. Understanding multiple accountability logics within corporate governance policy discourse: resistance, compromise, or selective coupling? European Accounting Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A, 2015. Reflexivity in sustainability accounting and management: transcending the economic focus of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 127 (3), 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Searcy, C., and Buslovich, R, 2014. Corporate perspectives on the development and use of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 121 (2), 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, M-G., and Creed, W.E.D., 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, J., Mehjabeen, M., and Stapleton, P, 2021. Emergence of corporate political activities in the guise of social responsibility: dispatches from a developing economy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (5), 1137–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu, A.M., and Gibbon, J, 2021. Institutionalisation of weak conceptions of sustainability in the United Nations clean development mechanism: empirical evidence from Malaysian organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (5), 1220–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvola, H., and Vinnari, E, 2021. The limits of institutional work: a field study on auditors’ efforts to promote sustainability assurance in a trust society. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Fox, B., and Heavey, C, 2023. Systematicity in organizational research literature reviews: a framework and assessment. Organizational Research Methods, 26 (2), 292–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Haniffa, R., and Fairbrass, J, 2011. A conceptual framework for investigating ‘capture’ in corporate sustainability reporting assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99 (3), 425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorour, M.K., Shrives, P.J., El-Sakhawy, A.A., and Soobaroyen, T, 2021. Exploring the evolving motives underlying corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures in developing countries: the case of “political CSR” reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34 (5), 1051–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C., Husillos, J., and Correa-Ruiz, C, 2010. Cargo cult science and the death of politics: a critical review of the social and environmental accounting literature. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21 (1), 76–89.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R, 2015. Can institutional theory be critical? Journal of Management Inquiry, 24 (1), 93–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoradeniya, P., Lee, J., Tan, R., and Ferreira, A, 2022. From intention to action on sustainability reporting: the role of individual, organisational and institutional factors during war and post-war periods. The British Accounting Review, 54 (1), 101021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H., and Ocasio, W., 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in higher education publishing 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W., and Lounsbury, M, 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, T., Lehman, C., and Neimark, M, 1991. Falling down the hole in the middle of the road: political quietism in corporate social reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4 (2), 28–54.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P.S., and Zucker, L.G., 1996. The institutionalization of institutional theory. I.S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W.R. Nord, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Tweedie, J, 2023a. The emancipatory potential of counter accounting: a Zizekian critique. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 95, 102505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweedie, J, 2023b. If critique is unsustainable, what is left? A commentary on Bigoni and Mohammed. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 97, 102597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., and Chapman, C, 2014. Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39 (6), 385–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, K, 2019. The logics of biodiversity accounting in the UK public sector. Accounting Forum, 43 (3), 348–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., and Appuhami, R, 2017. Strategic responses to institutional pressures for sustainability: the role of management control systems. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30 (8), 1677–1710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, H, 2011. “Institutional work” for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20 (1), 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, H, 2015. Why institutional theory cannot be critical. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 105–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, H, 2019. Can it? On expanding institutional theory by disarming critique. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28 (3), 350–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zald, M.N., and Lounsbury, M, 2010. The wizards of Oz: towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organization Studies, 31 (7), 963–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, S.X., Xu, X.D., Yin, H.T., and Tam, C.M., 2012. Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 109 (3), 309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar