Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery

References

• MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Malloy MH. Trends and characteristics of induced labor in the United States, 1989–98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2002; 16(3)263–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elferink-Stinkens PM, Van Hemel OJ, Brand R. Differences in obstetrical intervention rates between Dutch hospitals. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994; 53(3)165–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe LG. Indications for induction of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 65(1)71–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, Fortier M, Fraser W. Risks of induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001; 15(2)131–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel B, Breart G, du Mazaubrun C, Badeyan G, Wcislo M, Lordier A, et al. [The perinatal situation in France. Trends between 1981 and 1995]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006; 26(8)770–80
   Google Scholar
• Blondel B, Supernant K, Du Mazaubrun C, Breart G. Trends in perinatal health in France between 1995 and 2003: results from the National Perinatal Surveys]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006; 35(4)373–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conférence de consensus sur le déclenchement de l'accouchement. Organisé par le collège des Gynaécologues Obstétriciens Français. J Gynécol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1995;24(Supplément 1).
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Technical Bulletin. Induction of labor. Number 217 – December 1995 (replaces No. 157, July 1991). American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996;53(1):65–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Directives Cliniques de la SOGC. Le déclenchement du travail à terme. J Obstet Gynecol Canada. 2001;107.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induction of labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline number 9. London: ROGC Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Goffinet F, Dreyfus M, Carbonne B, Magnin G, Cabrol D. Survey of the practice of cervical ripening and labor induction in France]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2003; 32(7)638–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(5)1511–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, Watts DH, Critchlow CW. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183(4)986–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180(3 Pt 1)628–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94(4)600–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(2)240–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffinet F, Humbert R, Clerson P, Philippe HJ, Breart G, Cabrol D. National survey on the use of induced labor by obstetricians. Study Group on Induced Labour]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1999; 28(4)319–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S, Skrondal, A, Pickles, A. Gllamm Manual. UC Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Macer, JA, Macer, CL, Chan, LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166, (6 Pt 1):1690–6; discussion 1696–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92(1)47–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105(4)690–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulvain, M, Kelly, A, Lohse, C, Stan, C, Irion, O. Mechanical methods for induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD001233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar