Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery

References

• Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989; 96: 1054–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol. 1994; 54: 175–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekera PC, Phipps JH, Lewis BV. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: a superior mode of treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 97: 995–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Kristensen FB. Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conisation. Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 81: 1005–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsmo S, Hansen MH, Jakobsen BK, Øian P. Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996; 75: 139–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, Soerheim N, Jacobse BK, Maltau JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arc Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 272: 109–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 1059–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA. 2004; 291: 2100–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 24: 25–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Althuisius SM, Schornagel IJ, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP, Hummel P. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 72: 31–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169: 620–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braet PG, Peel JM, Fenton DW. A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 14: 79–82
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank ME, Flannelly C, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 102: 467–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1246–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis NJ. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 86: 10–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JMG. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 102: 1058–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 367: 489–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 325–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhoff-Roos, J, Kesmodel, U, Jacobsson, B, Rasmussen, S, Vogel, I. Spontaneous preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.38751.524132.2F (published 23 February 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer SK, van den Brule AJ, Bock JE, Poll PA, Engholm G, Sherman ME, et al. Human papillomavirus – the most significant risk determinant of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 1996; 65: 601–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang KY, Zeger ZL. The analysis of discrete and continuous longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1986; 42: 121–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry DJ, Baggish MS, Brady K, Walsh PM, Hungler MS. The effects of loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical length: implications for pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 516–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskevaidis E, Bilirakis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis ED, Kalantaridou S, Paschopoulos M, et al. Cervical regeneration after diathermy excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 102: 88–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar