A model of the differentation and relative incidence of glandular versus squamous cell neoplasia of the uterine cervix: Connection between incidence and etiology

References

• Koss LG. Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and its precursors. Koss's Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic basesFifth edition, LG Koss. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 2005; 283
   Google Scholar
• Zheng T, Holford TR, Ma Z, Chen Y, Liu W, Ward BA, et al. The continuing increase in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: A birth cohort phenomenon. Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25: 252–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HO, Tiffany MF, Qualls CR. The rising incidense of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States – a 24 year population based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 78: 97–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray F, Carstensen B, Moller H, Zappa M, Zakelj MP, Lawrence G, et al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 2191–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer: Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: Collaborative analysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,378 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2007;15:885–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby C, Page KM, Tomlinson IP. What can we learn from the population studies of cancer? Armitage and Doll revisited. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8: 1030–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppäluoto PA. The Pill and cervical cancer: The causal association. Acta Cytol. 2006; 50: 704–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppäluoto PA. Contraceptive choise and cervical cytology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974; 118: 581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaszczak S, Hafez ESE. The vagina and reproductive processes. Human reproduction, conception and contraception, ESE Hafez. Harper & Row, Hagerstown, MD 1980; 271–86
   Google Scholar
• Leppäluoto PA. A cytologic evaluation of the relationship of coitus and vaginal mycoplasma. J Reprod Med. 1972; 9: 35–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppleson M, Reid B. The etiology of squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Editorial. Obstet Gynecol. 1968; 32: 432–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks LV. Sexual chemistry. A history of the contraceptive pill. Biddles, GuildfordUK 2001; 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Syrjänen K, Yliskoski M, Kataja V, Hippeläinen M, Syrjänen S, Saarikoski S, et al. Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in mass-screened Finnish female population aged 20–65 years. Int J STD AIDS. 1990; 1: 410–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith JS, Green J, Berrington DE, Gonzales A, Appleby P, Peto J, et al. Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: A systematic review. Lancet. 2003; 361: 1159–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uckert S, Mayer ME, Stief CG, Jonas U. The future of the oral pharmacotherapy of male erectile dysfunction: Things to come. Expert Opin Emerg Drug. 2007; 12: 219–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily doses of oral hormonal contraceptives sold in Finland between 1981–2007 and of drugs used in erectile dysfunction between 1998–2007. Statistics provided to the author by the National Agency for Medicines, August 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. J & A Churchill, London 1966; 88–100
   Google Scholar
• Gardner HL, Dukes CD. Haemophilus vaginalis. A newly defined specific infection previously classified “nonspecific” vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955; 69: 962–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppäluoto PA. Autopsy of bacterial vaginosis: A physiological entity rather than a contagious disease. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 578–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (a) Stoler MH. The pathology of cervical neoplasia. In: TE Rohan, KV Shah Cervical cancer: From etiology to prevention. DordrechtThe Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. p. 11–6; (b) Stoler MH. The pathology of cervical neoplasia. In: TE Rohan, KV Shah Cervical cancer: From etiology to prevention. DordrechtThe Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. p. 44.
   Google Scholar
• Leppäluoto PA. The coitus-induced dynamics of vaginal bacteriology. J Reprod Med. 1971; 7: 169–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwatz S, Weiss NS. Increased incidence of adenocarcinoma in young women in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1986; 124: 1045–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serfany D, Wildemeersch D, Verougstraete A, Creatsas G. European Society of Contraception oral contraceptives survey update: Birth control methods in “Europe the 12”. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1995; 40 Suppl 2: 73–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigurdsson K. The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programs: Trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 478–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillner L, Pagliusi S, Bray F, Attila L, Kjaer SK, Anttila A, et al. Strengthening prevention programs to eliminate cervical cancer in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 489–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar