References
- Fischer BA. 4th. A summary of important documents in the field of research ethics. Schizophr Bull 2006; 32: 69–80
- Junghans C, Feder G, Hemingway H, Timmis A, Jones M. Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of “opt-in” versus “opt-out” strategies. BMJ 2005; 331: 1082–3
- Jacomb PA, Jorm AF, Korten AE, Christensen H, Henderson AS. Predictors of refusal to participate: a longitudinal health survey of the elderly in Australia. BMC Public Health 2002; 2: 4
- Al-Shahi R, Vousden C, Warlow C. Bias from requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: prospective, population based study. BMJ 2005;331(7522):942 doi:10.1136/bmj.38624.397569.68.
- Larzeler RE, Kuhn BR, Johnson B. The intervention selection bias: an unrecognized confound in intervention research. Psychol Bull 2004; 130: 289–303
- Jones SJ, Hedley AJ, Young RE, Dinwoodie DL, Bewsher PD. Lost to follow-up’: reasons for discontinued surveillance in a follow-up register. J Public Health 1981; 3: 25–30
- Rodger MA, Makropoulos D, Walker M, Keely E, Karovitch A, Wells PS. Participation of pregnant women in clinical trials: will they participate and why?. Am J Perinatol 2003; 20: 69–76
- Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191–4
- Britton A, McKee M, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C. Threats of applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999; 4: 112–21
- van den Berg L, Lobatto RM, Zuurmond WWA, de Lange JJ, Wagemans MFM, Bezemer PD. Patients’ refusal to participate in clinical research. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1997; 14: 287–9
- Iversen WA, Liddell K, Fear N, Hotopf M, Wessely S. Consent, confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act. BMJ 2006; 332: 165–9