Are tests for predicting pre-eclampsia good enough to make screening viable? A review of reviews and critical appraisal

References

• World Health Organization International Collaborative Study of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. Geographic variation in the incidence of hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:80–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Hague WM, Higgins J, Lowe S, McCowan L, Oats J. The detection, investigation, and management of hypertension in pregnancy: full consensus statement. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 40: 139–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford RW, Jr, August PA, Cunningham G, Green LA, Lindhemier MD, McNellis D. Report of the national high blood pressure education program working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, deSweit M, Van Assche A, Moutquin J. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the international society for the study of hypertension in pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001; 20: 9–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, G, Drife, J, Botting, B, Carson, C, Cooper, G, Hall, M. Hypertension in pregnancy. The fifth report of confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer MS, Seguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly?. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000; 14: 194–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt BG, Newnham JP. A review of the obstetric and medical complications leading to the delivery of infants of very low birthweight. Med J Aust. 1988; 149: 234238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhard IM, van Rij M, Boullart I, Ekhart THA, Spaanderman MEA, van den Hout M. Posttraumatic stress disorder after pre-eclampsia: an exploratory study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002; 24: 260–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg K, Twaddle S. Screening and surveillance of pregnancy hypertension – an economic approach to the use of daycare. Bailliere Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 4: 89–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony J. Improving antenatal care: the role of an antenatal assessment unit. Health Trends. 1992; 24: 123–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouvier-Colle MH, Salanave B, Ancel PY, Varnoux N, Fernandez E, Papiernik E, et al. Obstetric patients treated in intensive care units and maternal mortality. Regional teams for the survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 65: 121–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006; 367: 1066–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office Home and Health Department, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern I. Why mothers die? Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. 1994–1996. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in pregnancy. ACOG Tech Bull. 1996; 219: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ananth CV, Savitz DA, Bowes WA. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and stillbirth in North Carolina, 1988–1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995; 74: 788–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at ante-natal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005; 330: 565–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnossen JS, van der Post JA, Mol BW, Khan KS, Meads CA, ter Riet G. Prediction of pre-eclampsia: a protocol for systematic reviews of test accuracy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006; 6: 29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meads CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, ter Riet G, Duley L, et al. Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12: 1–270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnossen JS, de Ruyter-Hanhijarvi H, van der Post JA, Mol BW, Khan KS, Ter RG. Accuracy of serum uric acid determination in predicting pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85: 519–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnossen JS, Leeflang MM, de Haan EE, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Khan KS, et al. Accuracy of body mass index in predicting pre-eclampsia: bivariate meta-analysis. BJOG. 2007; 114: 1477–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnossen JS, Vollebregt KC, de VN, Ter RG, Mol BW, Franx A, et al. Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008; 336: 1117–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnossen JS, Morris RK, Ter RG, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Coomarasamy A, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008; 178: 701–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeflang MM, Cnossen JS, van der Post JA, Mol BW, Khan KS, Ter RG. Accuracy of fibronectin tests for the prediction of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007; 133: 12–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris RK, Cnossen JS, Langejans M, Robson SC, Kleijnen J, Ter RG, et al. Serum screening with Down's syndrome markers to predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008; 8: 33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48: 119–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 982–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 4.2.0, updated March 2003. In: M Clarke, Oxman, AD. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003. Oxford: Update Software; 2006, updated quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Dinnes J, Kleijnen J. Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 95: 6–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. National High Blood Pressure Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting P, Rutges AW, Rietsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003; 3: 25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Houwelingen HC, Zwinderman KH, Stijnen T. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1993; 12: 2273–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21: 589–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Lindheimer M. World Health Organisation systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 104: 1367–91
   Google Scholar
• Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999; 282: 1061–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van Rijn JC, Bossuyt PM. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ. 2006; 174: 469–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siadaty MS, Philbrick JT, Heim SW, Schectman JM. Repeated-measures modeling improved comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis of dependent studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57: 698–711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Stat Med. 2004; 23: 1663–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar