Use of criterion-based clinical audit to improve the quality of obstetric care: A systematic review

References

• Jamtvedt, G, Young, JM, Kristoffersen, DT, O'Brien, MA, Oxman, AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006. Issue 2. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Beyond the numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Filippi V, Brugha R, Browne E, Gohou V, Bacci A, De Brouwere V, et al. Obstetric audit in resource-poor settings: lessons from a multi-country project auditing ‘near miss’ obstetrical emergencies. Health Policy Plan. 2004; 19: 57–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward HR, Howarth GR, Jennings OJ, Pattinson RC. Audit incorporating avoidability and appropriate intervention can significantly decrease perinatal mortality. S Afr Med J. 1995; 85: 147–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandin-Bojö AK, Hall-Lord ML, Axelsson O, Larsson BW. Intrapartal care in a Swedish maternity unit after a quality-improvement programme. Midwifery. 2007; 23: 113–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg K, Hepburn M, McIlwaine G. An audit of caesarean section in a maternity district. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982; 89: 787–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillies A. Improving patient care in the UK: clinical audit in the Oxford region. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996; 8: 141–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney GC, Glasier A, Templeton A. Multicentre criterion based audit of the management of induced abortion in Scotland. BMJ. 1994; 309: 15–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney JP, Welsh J, Owen P. Management of early pregnancy loss – a complete audit cycle. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 26: 229–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson GM, Hannh WJ, Vayda E, Singer J. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines: delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA. 1991; 265: 2202–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiwanuka AI, Moore WM. Influence of audit and feedback on use of caesarean section in a geographically-defined population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993; 50: 59–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 199–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GM. An audit of the implementation of guidelines to reduce wound infection following caesarean section. Health Bull (Edinb) 2000; 58: 38–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruce D, Stone S, Harding K. Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections – completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 22: 273–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicoll AE, Black C, Powls A, Mackenzie F. An audit of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section at term. Scott Med J. 2004; 49: 22–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicopoullos JD, Karrar S, Gour A, Panter K. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma – -completion of the audit cycle. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 23: 381–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagaarachchi PT, Graham WJ, Penney GC, McCaw-Binns A, Yeboah Antwi K, Hall MH. Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 74: 119–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GM, McKenzie CA, Mires GJ. The use of audit to improve clinical effectiveness in an infrequent obstetric therapy: magnesium sulphate in severe pre-eclampsia. Scott Med J. 1998; 43: 151–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen P. Audit can ensure the safe and effective introduction of seizure prophylaxis with magnesium sulphate in obstetric practice. Health Bull (Edinb) 2000; 58: 414–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldwin KJ, Leighton NA, Kilby MD, Wyldes M, Churchill D, Jones PW, et al. The ‘Severe Hypertensive Illness in Pregnancy’ (SHIP) audit: promoting quality care using a high risk monitoring chart and eclampsia treatment pack. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 22: 346–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weeks AD, Alia G, Ononge S, Otolorin EO, Mirembe FM. A criteria-based audit of the management of severe pre-eclampsia in Kampala, Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 91: 292–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks AD, Alia G, Ononge S, Mutungi A, Otolorin EO, Mirembe FM. Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13: 52–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weeks AD, Alia G, Ononge S, Mutungi A, Otolorin EO, Mirembe FM. Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units. BMJ. 2003; 327: 1329–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon LC, Parsons J. Audit of the effectiveness of cervical preparation with Dilapan prior to late second-trimester (20–24 weeks) surgical termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2007; 114: 485–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A, Adams EJ, Bolderson J, Tincello DG, Richmond DH. Effect of a new guideline on outcome following third-degree perineal tears: results of a 3-year audit. Int Urogynecol J. 2003; 14: 385–9
   Google Scholar
• Siassakos D, Anderson H, Panter K. Breech presentation: an audit project as means of pursuing clinical excellence. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 25: 642–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toohill J, Soong B, Meldrum M. Risk management considerations and the pregnancy handheld record. An audit of the return rate of the pregnancy handheld record. Women Birth. 2006; 19: 113–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khoo C, Welsh J, Owen P. Antenatal corticosteroid prescribing: a complete audit cycle. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 27: 33–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCord N, Owen P, Powls A, Lunan B. A complete audit cycle of intrapartum group B streptococcus prophylaxis. Health Bull (Edinb) 2001; 59: 263–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailón E, Delgado A, Montoro R, Vázquez R, Sánchez MR, Alemany V. Efficacy of auditing in improving a control program of pregnancy. Aten Primaria. 1992; 9: 85–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Axt-Adam P, van der Wouden JC, van der Does E. Influencing behavior of physicians ordering laboratory tests: a literature study. Med Care. 1993; 31: 784–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Evidence-led obstetric care: report of a WHO meeting – Geneva, Switzerland, 28–30 January 2004. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hearnshaw H, Harker R, Cheater F, Baker R, Grimshaw G. Use of criterion-based clinical audit to improve the quality of obstetric care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2002; 6: 1–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006; 367: 1066–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittrof R, Campbell OM, Filippi VG. What is quality in maternity care? An international perspective. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81: 277–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J, Gotzsche P, Kunz RA, Oxman AD, Chalmers I. What's so special about randomisation?. Non-random reflections of health services research, A Maynard, I Chalmers. BMJ Publishing Group, London 1997; 93–106
   Google Scholar
• R Queenborough. NHS pharmacy audit handbook. London: National Prescribing Centre; 2000.
   Google Scholar