Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Volume 61, 2003 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
150
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Flexural strength and modulus of a novel ceramic restorative cement intended for posterior restorations as determined by a three-point bending test

Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg Department of Odontology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Anne Peutzfeldt Department of Odontology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
&
Jan W. V. van Dijken Department of Odontology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Pages 87-92 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

  • Büchner W, Schliebs R, Winter G, Bûchel KH. Industrial inorganic chemistry, 1st ed. Weinheim, Germany: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH; 1989. p. 414.
  • Van Vlack LH. Elements of materials science, 2nd ed. Reading, Mass., USA: Addison-Wesley; 1971. p. 43-5 and 203-5.
  • O'Brien W. Dental materials and their selection, 2nd ed. Chicago, II., USA: Quintessence Publishing; 1997. p. 97-105.
  • Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:297-303.
  • Kreulen CM, Tobi H, Gruythuysen RJM, Amerongen van WE, Borgmeijer PJ. Replacement risk of amalgam treatment modalities: 15-year results. J Dent 1998;26:627-32.
  • Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodgen K-LV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998;26:311-7.
  • Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicenter clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17:10-7.
  • Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of toothcolored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48: 304-11.
  • Sunnegårdh-Gronberg K, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JWV. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sei 2002;110:175- 8.
  • Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. 2-year clinical evaluation of class I posterior composites. AmJ Dent 1996;9:150-2.
  • Prati C, Montanari G. Three-year clinical study of two composite resins and one non-gamma 2 conventional amalgam in posterior teeth. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1988;98: 120-5.
  • van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Effect of the use of rubber dam versus cotton rolls on marginal adaptation of composite resin fillings to acid-etched enamel. Acta Odontol Scand 1987;45: 303-8.
  • Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Modulus of resilience as predictor for clinical wear of restorative resins. Dent Mater 1992;8:146-8.
  • Li ZC, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:597-609.
  • BruningJL, Kintz BL. Computational handbook of statistics, 4th ed. Reading, Mass., USA: Addison-Wesley, 1997.
  • Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer H-C. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. J Prosthodont 2001;10:140-7.
  • ManhartJ, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40.
  • Hofmann N, Hugo B, Schubert K, Klaiber B. Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4: 140-7.
  • lazzetti G, Burgess JO, Gardiner D. Selected mechanical properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001;26:21-6.
  • Yap AUJ, Tan DlT, Goh BKC, Kuah HG, Goh M. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the flexural strength of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2000;25: 202-8.
  • Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000;16:129-38.
  • Attin T, Vataschki M, Helhwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996;27:203-9.
  • Asmussen E. Hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:484-9.
  • Braem M, Finger W, van Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 1989;5:346-8.
  • Condon JR, FerracaneJL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997;76:1405 -11.
  • Khouw-Liu VHW, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. An in vitro investigation of a poly(vinyl) phosphonic acid) based cement with four conventional glass-ionomer cements. Part 1: flexural strength and fluoride release. J Dent 1999;27:351-7.
  • Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cement, 1st ed. Chicago, II., USA: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1988. p. 48-51.
  • Uno S, Finger W, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-9.
  • Williams JA, Billington RW. Changes in compressive strength of glass ionomer restorative materials with respect to time periods of 24h to 4 months. J Oral Rehab 1991;18:163-8.
  • Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Everyday glassionomer and amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1997;76:1387-96.
  • Qvist V. Longevity of restorations in primary teeth. In: Hugoson A, FaIk M, Johansson S, editors. Consensus conference on caries in the primary dentition and its clinical management. Jönköping, Sweden: Gothia; 2002. p. 69-82.
  • Peutzfeldt A. Gompomers and glass ionomers: bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties. AmJ Dent 1996;9:259-63.
  • Ferracane JL, Condon JR. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 1999;15:262-7.
  • Cobb DS, MacGregor M, Vargas MA, Denhey GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resinbased composites: a comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;! 31: 1610-5.
  • Bryant RW, Marzbani N, Hodge K-LV. Occlusal margin defects around different types of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent 1992;17:215--21.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.