Relationship between bond strength and marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations photocured by different methods

References

• Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103: 322–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 128–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 167–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinomoto Y, Torii M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Comparison of polymerization contraction stress between self- and light-curing composites. J Dent 1999; 27: 383–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 107–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation on resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 359–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 17–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso RCB, Cunha LG, Correr GM, de Goes MF, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM, et al. Association of photoactivation methods and low modulus liner on marginal adaptation of composite restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62: 298–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl A, Hichel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light cured composites with and without soft-start polymerization. J Dent 1997; 25: 321–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL, Condon JR. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light activation. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 436–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uno S, Tanaka T, Natsuizaka A, Abo T. Effect of slow-curing on cavity wall adaptation using a new intensity-changeable light source. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 147–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yap AUJ, Ng SC, Siow KS. Soft-start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 260–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining the degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998; 26: 695–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW, Jr, Davis HC. Factors affecting cure at depths within light activated resin composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 91–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Obici AC, Sinhoreti MAC, Goes MF, Consani S, Sobrinho LC. Effect of photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 192–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanca J, Suh BI. Pulse activation: reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 107–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Effect of pulse-delay curing on in vitro wall-to-wall contraction of composite in dentin cavity preparations. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 295–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uhl A, Michaelis C, Mills RW, Jandt KD. The influence of storage and indenter load on the Knoop hardness of dental composites polymerized with LED and halogen technologies. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 21–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 279–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative system. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 658–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of hybrid zone as a stress absorbing layer in resin-dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 733–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prati C, Nucci C, Davidson CL, et al. Early marginal leakage and shear bond strength of adhesive restorative systems. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 195–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 88–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 36–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Lee IK. Push-out bond strengths of tooth-colored posts bonded with different adhesive systems. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 422–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz JS, Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS, Bowles WR. Bond strengths of tooth-colored posts, effect of sealer, dentin adhesive, and root region. Am J Dent ;:A 2003; 16: 31A–6
   Google Scholar
• Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage tension in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997; 25: 435–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha LG, Alonso RCB, Sinhoreti MAC, Goes MF, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effect of photoactivation methods and base materials on the stress generated by the polymerization shrinkage of a resin composite. Brazil J Oral Sci 2004; 3: 609–14
   Google Scholar
• Sinhoreti MAC, Correr Sobrinho L, Alonso RCB, Consani S, de Goes MF. Effect of photoactivation methods on marginal microleakage of class V composite restorations. Brazil Dent Sci 2003; 6: 35–40
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Yukitani W, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H. Effects of soft-start irradiation on the depth of cure and marginal adaptation to dentin. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 389–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Soft-start polymerization and marginal gap formation in vitro. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 145–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst CP, Kürschner R, Rippin G, Willershausen B. Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light-curing unit. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 69–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamichi I, Iwaru M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 1076–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH, Jr, Puckett AD. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 230–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, Geurtsen W. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 355–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar