Finnish dentists’ perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations

References

• Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 245–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001; 29: 317–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson JE, Worthington HV, Davies RM. Restorative treatment provided over five years for adults regularly attending general dental practice. J Dent 2000; 28: 233–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forss H, Widström E. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 2001; 59: 57–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA. Longterm cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 60–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobi H, Kreulen CM, Vondeling H, van Amerongen WE. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27: 137–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick BL, Dummer PM, Dunstan FD, Gilmour AS, Jones RJ, Phillips CJ, et al. What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations. Qual Health Care 1999; 8: 202–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjögren P, Halling A. Survival time of class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment. Swed Dent J 2002; 26: 59–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren P, Halling A. Long-term cost of direct class II molar restorations. Swed Dent J 2002; 26: 107–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chadwick B, Treasure E, Dummer P, Dunstan F, Gilmour A, Jones R, et al. The longevity of dental restorations: a systematic review. York Publishing Services, University of York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 247–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bayne SC. Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation – testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision-making. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 921–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad A, Bayne S, Blunck U, Tyas M, Wilson N. Quality of dental restorations. FDI Commission Project 2–95. Int Dent J 2001; 51: 117–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 25: 481–508
   Google Scholar
• Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 297–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogacki RE, Hunt RJ, del Aguila M, Smith WR. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 488–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder R. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 2): Variation by patients’ characteristics. J Dent 2005; 33: 817–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder R. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 4): Influence of time and place. J Dent 2005; 33: 837–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): Variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. J Dent 2005; 33: 805–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 3): Variation by dentist factors. J Dent 2005; 33: 827–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 117–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinikainen M, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners. Community Dent Health 2002; 19: 98–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999; 187: 432–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000; 58: 97–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwenhuysen J-P, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003; 31: 395–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forss H, Widström E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62: 82–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 135–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maryniuk GA, Kaplan SH. Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists’ estimates and attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 112: 39–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison K, Schoen M. A comparison of quality in dual-choice dental plan: capitation versus fee-for-service. J Public Health Dent 1990; 50: 186–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grytten J. The effect of supplier inducement on Norwegian dental services. Community Dent Health 1991; 8: 221–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawthorne WS, Smales RJ. Factors influencing long-term restoration survival in three private dental practices in Adelaide. Aust Dent J 1997; 42: 59–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake CW, Maryniuk GA, Bentley C. Reasons for restoration replacement: differences in practice patterns. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 125–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maryniuk GA. Practice variation: learned and socio-economic factors. Adv Dent Res 1990; 4: 19–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kay EJ, Nuttall NM. Clinical decision making – an art or a science? Part II: making sense of treatment decisions. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 113–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejàre I, Sundberg H, Espelid I, Tveit AB. Caries assessment and restorative treatment thresholds reported by Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57: 149–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan RT, Burke FJ. Response rates to questionnaires mailed to dentists. A review of 77 publications. Int Dent J 1997; 47: 349–54
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane E, Olmsted MG, Murphy J, Hill CA. Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians. Eval Health Prof 2007; 30: 170–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. Br Dent J 2002; 192: 699–702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar