References
- Blamey PJ, Barry JG, Jacq P. Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 73–9
- Svirsky MA, Chin SB. Speech production. Cochlear implants, SB Waltzman, NL Cohen. Thieme Medical, New York 2000; 293–309
- Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci 2000; 11: 153–8
- Tobey EA, Hasenstab MS. Effects of a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 48S–54S
- Tye-Murray N, Spencer L, Woodworth GG. Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. J Speech Lang Hear 1995; 38: 327–37
- Faulkner A, Rosen S, Smith C. Effects of the salience of pitch and periodicity information on the intelligibility of four-channel vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 1877–87
- Geurts L, Wouters J. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 713–26
- Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulation of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 2155–64
- Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 2298–310
- Rosen S. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992; 336: 367–73
- Burns EM, Viemester NF. Nonspectral pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 60: 863–9
- Loizou PC. Introduction to cochlear implants. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1998; 18: 32–42
- Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 1983; 11: 157–89
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Technical report: cochlear implants. ASHA Suppl 2003;24.
- Wilson BS. Engineering design of cochlear implants. Cochlear implants: auditory prostheses and electric hearing, FG Zeng, AN Popper, RR Fay. Springer-Verlag, New York 2004; 14–52
- Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1150–63
- Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD. Speech processors for cochlear prostheses. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1988; 76: 1143–54
- Fu QJ, Zeng FG, Shannon RV, Soli SD. Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 505–10
- Moore BCJ. Aspects of auditory processing related to speech perception. The handbook of phonetic science, WJ Hardcastle, J Laver. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge 1997; 539–65
- Ladd DR. Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996
- Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals. MIT Press, Cambridge 1970
- Lehiste I. Suprasegmental features of speech. Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics, NJ Lass. Academic Press, New York 1976; 225–39
- Chao YR. A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles 1968
- Howie JM. Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1976
- Whalen DH, Xu Y. Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica 1992; 49: 25–47
- Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA. Effect of frequency boundary assignment on speech recognition with the SPEAK speech-coding strategy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 307–11
- Fu Q-J, Shannon RV. Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 332–44
- Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Slattery WH. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1999; 20: 729–34
- Peng SC, Tomblin JB, Cheung H, Lin YS, Wang LS. Perception and production of mandarin tones in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 251–64
- Xu L, Tsai Y, Pfingst BE. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 247–58
- Luo X, Fu QJ. Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 3659–67
- Clopton BM, Spelman FA. Technology and the future of cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2003; 191: 26–32