Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Volume 140, 2020 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,017
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Inner ear

Genetic testing has the potential to impact hearing preservation following cochlear implantation

Hidekane YoshimuraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; View further author information
,
Hideaki MotekiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, JapanView further author information
,
Shin-ya NishioDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, JapanView further author information
,
Hiroki MiyajimaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; View further author information
,
Maiko MiyagawaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, JapanView further author information
&
Shin-ichi UsamiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 438-444 | Received 24 Jan 2020, Accepted 07 Feb 2020, Published online: 05 Mar 2020

References

  • von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. Audiol Neurotol. 2011;16(s2):1–30.
  • Welch C, Dillon MT, Pillsbury HC. Electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant recipients with hearing preservation. Semin Hear. 2018;39(04):414–427.
  • Usami S, Moteki H, Suzuki N, et al. Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(4):405–412.
  • Hochmair I, Hochmair E, Nopp P, et al. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2015;322:14–23.
  • Usami S, Moteki H, Tsukada K, et al. Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(7):717–727.
  • Wanna GB, O'Connell BP, Francis DO, et al. Predictive factors for short- and long-term hearing preservation in cochlear implantation with conventional-length electrodes. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(2):482–489.
  • Moteki H, Nishio SY, Miyagawa M, et al. Feasibility of hearing preservation for residual hearing with longer cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(12):1080–1085.
  • Helbig S, Adel Y, Leinung M, et al. Hearing preservation outcomes after cochlear implantation depending on the angle of insertion: indication for electric or electric-acoustic stimulation. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(7):834–841.
  • Takahashi M, Arai Y, Sakuma N, et al. Cochlear volume as a predictive factor for residual-hearing preservation after conventional cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(4):345–350.
  • Usami S, Nishio SY, Moteki H, et al. Cochlear implantation from genetic background viewpoints. Anat Rec. 2020;303(3):563–593.
  • Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, et al. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2013;133(564):3–13.
  • Nishio SY, Usami S. Deafness gene variations in a 1120 nonsyndromic hearing loss cohort: molecular epidemiology and deafness mutation spectrum of patients in Japan. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(1):49S–60S.
  • Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Dziendziel B, et al. Electro-natural stimulation in partial deafness treatment of adult cochlear implant users: long-term hearing preservation results. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2019;81(2–3):63–72.
  • Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H, Dziendziel B, et al. Hearing preservation with the use of flex20 and flex24 electrodes in patients with partial deafness. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(9):1153–1159.
  • Suhling MC, Majdani O, Salcher R, et al. The impact of electrode array length on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(8):1006–1015.
  • Buchman CA, Dillon MT, King ER, et al. Influence of cochlear implant insertion depth on performance: a prospective randomized trial. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(10):1773–1779.
  • Nishio SY, Attori M, Moteki H, et al. Gene expression profiles of the cochlea and vestibular endorgans: localization and function of genes causing deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(1):6S–48S.
  • Reiss LA, Stark G, Nguyen-Huynh AT, et al. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model. Hear Res. 2015;327:163–174.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.