Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Volume 140, 2020 - Issue 8
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,855
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Inner ear

Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing

Hidekane YoshimuraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan; View further author information
,
Hideaki MotekiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, JapanView further author information
,
Shin-ya NishioDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, JapanView further author information
&
Shin-ichi UsamiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 624-630 | Received 15 Mar 2020, Accepted 17 Apr 2020, Published online: 05 Jun 2020

References

  • von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1999;61(6):334–340.
  • Moteki H, Nishio SY, Miyagawa M, et al. Long-term results of hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery in patients with residual low frequency hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(5):516–521.
  • Usami S, Moteki H, Tsukada K, et al. Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(7):717–727.
  • von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. Audiol Neurotol. 2011;16(s2):1–30.
  • Gstoettner W, Helbig S, Settevendemie C, et al. A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(4):372–379.
  • Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species–29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;87(6):2592–2605.
  • Buchner A, Illg A, Majdani O, et al. Investigation of the effect of cochlear implant electrode length on speech comprehension in quiet and noise compared with the results with users of electro-acoustic-stimulation, a retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0174900.
  • Buchman CA, Dillon MT, King ER, et al. Influence of cochlear implant insertion depth on performance: a prospective randomized trial. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(10):1773–1779.
  • Usami S, Moteki H, Suzuki N, et al. Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(4):405–412.
  • Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, et al. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2013; 133(564):3–13.
  • Nishio SY, Usami S. Deafness gene variations in a 1120 nonsyndromic hearing loss cohort: molecular epidemiology and deafness mutation spectrum of patients in Japan. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(1):49S–60S.
  • Welch C, Dillon MT, Pillsbury HC. Electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant recipients with hearing preservation. Semin Hear. 2018;39(04):414–427.
  • Hochmair I, Hochmair E, Nopp P, et al. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2015;322:14–23.
  • Moteki H, Nishio SY, Miyagawa M, et al. Feasibility of hearing preservation for residual hearing with longer cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(12):1080–1085.
  • Yoshimura H, Moteki H, Nishio SY, et al. Genetic testing has the potential to impact hearing preservation following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;5:1–7.
  • Schatzer R, Vermeire K, Visser D, et al. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch. Hear Res. 2014;309:26–35.
  • Usami S, Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, et al. Patients with CDH23 mutations and the 1555A > G mitochondrial mutation are good candidates for electric acoustic stimulation (EAS). Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132(4):377–384.
  • Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, Usami S. Prevalence and clinical features of hearing loss patients with CDH23 mutations: a large cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e40366.
  • Lenarz T, Timm ME, Salcher R, et al. Individual hearing preservation cochlear implantation using the concept of partial insertion. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(3):e326–e335.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.