EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation

References

• Ekdale EG. Form and function of the mammalian inner ear. J Anat. 2016;228(2):324–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigande JV, Heller S. Quo Vadis, hair cell regeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(6):679–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskar AS, Kieszak SM, Holmes A, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the third national health and nutrition examination survey. JAMA. 1998;279(14):1071–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1999;61(6):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, Tillein J, von Illberg C. Fundamental aspects and first clinical results of the clinical application of combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. In: Kubo T, Iwaki Tm Takagashi Y, editors. Advances in cochlear implants. The Hague: Kugler Publications. p. 569–576.
   Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, Loren A, Piotrowska A. A new method of partial deafness treatment. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9(4):CS20–CS204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tzifa K, Hanvey K. Cochlear implantation in asymmetrical hearing loss for children: our experience. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013;14(Suppl 4):S56–S61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, et al. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004;124(3):272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adunka O, Unkelbach MH, Mack M, Hambek M, et al. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004;124(7):807–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH, et al. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(7):1237–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanasingh A. The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;7(1):45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorens A, Polak M, Piotrowska A, et al. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a Duet study. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(2):288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig S, Baumann U, Helbig M, et al. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation-eight months experience. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008;70(6):359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig S, Baumann U. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device – a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:81–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorens A, Zgoda M, Skarzynski H. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132(7):739–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmeier SJ, Peterreins M, Lorens A, et al. J. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C test. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:70–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, et al. Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127(1):41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, Lorens A. Electric acoustic stimulation in children. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:135–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshimura H, Moteki H, Nishio SY, et al. Genetic testing has the potential to impact hearing preservation following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;140(6):438–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamat A, Goldin L, Hoffman RA. Unusual electroacoustic device failure and electroacoustic reimplantation with hearing preservation. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(6):948–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayawardena J, Kuthubutheen J, Rajan G. Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(5):740–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig S, Rajan GP, Stöver T, et al. Hearing preservation after cochlear reimplantation. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(1):61–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson NJ, Dillon MT, Bucker AL, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation after reimplantation: hearing preservation and speech perception. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(2):e94–e98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, et al. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2013;133(sup564):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarzynski H, et al. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear. 2013;34(4):413–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford RH, Davis TJ, Sunderhaus LW, et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation with hearing preservation: effect of cochlear implant low-frequency cutoff on speech understanding and perceived listening difficulty. Ear Hear. 2017;38(5):539–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usami S-I, Moteki H, Tsukada K, et al. Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(7):717–727.,.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillsbury HC, Dillon MT, Buchman CA, 3rd, et al. Multicenter US clinical trial with an electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) system in adults: final outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(3):299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland JT, Jr, Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, et al. United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(1):175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, Lorens A. Partial deafness treatment. Cochlear Implants Int. 2010;11(sup1):29–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helbig S, Bauman U, Hey C, et al. Hearing preservation after complete cochlear coverage in cochlear implantation with the free-fitting FLEX electrode carrier. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(6):973–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa Maria PL, Domville-Lewis C, Sucher CM, et al. Hearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation-Hearing and quality of life after 2 years. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(3):526–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens G, Kleine PA, Cochlet E, et al. P. Long-term follow-up of hearing preservation in electric-acoustic stimulation patients. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(10):1765–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moteki H, Nishio SY, Miyagawa M, et al. Long-term results of hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery in patients with residual low frequency hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(5):516–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig S, Adel Y, Rader T, et al. Long-term hearing preservation outcomes after cochlear implantation for electric-acoustic stimulation. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(9):e353-359–e359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinzl GM, Schoerg P, Edlinger SH, et al. Long-term hearing preservation in electric acoustic cochlear implant candidates. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(6):750–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Wolford R, Lawson D, et al. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third quarterly progress report. NIH project N01-DC-2-1002.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, Pok S, Adunka O, et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol. 2005;10(3):134–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, et al. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear Hear. 2008;29(1):76–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak M, Lorens A, Helbig S, et al. Fitting of the Hearing System Affects Partial Deafness Cochlear Implant Performance. Cochlear Implants Int. 2010;11(sup1):117–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polak M, Lorens A, Furmanek M, et al. Electrode estimation in the acoustic region of the human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;140(6):487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorens A, Zgoda M, Polak M. Stimulus and place overlap on PDT-EC and PDT-EAS patients after deep electrode insertion. 32nd World Congress of Audiology, Processedings May 3–7th, 2014. 347:75.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimura H, Moteki H, Nishio SY, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;140(8):632–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan G, Tavora-Vieira D, Baumgartner W-D, et al. Hearing preservation cochlear implantation in children: the HEARRING group consensus and practical guide. Cochlear Implants Int. 2018;19(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardy M. The length of the organ of corti in man. Am J Anat. 1938;62(2):291–311.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood DD. Critical bandwidth and consonance: their operational definitions in relation to cochlear nonlinearity and combination tones. Hear Res. 1991;54(2):209–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escude B, James C, Deguine O, et al. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11(1):27–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexiades G, Dhanasingh A, Jolly C. Method to estimate the complete and two-turn cochlear duct length. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(5):904–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanasingh A. Research software in cochlear duct length estimation, Greenwood frequency mapping and CI electrode array length simulation. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;7(1):17–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prentiss S, Sykes K, Staecker H. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(3):197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Zgoda M, et al. Atraumatic round window deep insertion of cochlear electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(7):740–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick P, Amoodi H, Shipp D, et al. Hearing preservation with full insertion of the FLEX SOFT electrode. Otol Neurotol. 2013;35:e40–e44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce IA, Felton M, Lockley M, et al. Hearing preservation cochlear implantation in adolescents. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(9):1552–1559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenarz T, Timm ME, Salcher R, et al. Individual Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation Using the Concept of Partial Insertion. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(3):e326–e335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usami SI, Moteki H, Suzuki N, et al. Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(4):405–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorens A, Walkowiak A, Polak M, et al. Cochlear microphonics in hearing preservation cochlear implantees. J Int Adv Otol. 2019;15(3):345–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury B, Adunka OF, Awan O, et al. Electrophysiologic consequences of flexible electrode insertions in gerbils with noise-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(3):519–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calloway NH, Fitzpatrick DC, Campbell AP, et al. Intracochlear electrocochleography during cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(8):1451–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya AN, Tavora-Vieira D, Rajan GP. Using the implant electrode array to conduct real-time intraoperative hearing monitoring during pediatric cochlear implantation: preliminary experiences. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(2):e148–e153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haumann S, Imsiecke M, Bauernfeind Büchner A, et al. Monitoring of the inner ear function during and after cochlear implant insertion using electrocochleography. Trends Hear. 2019;23:2331216519833567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman J, Liu XZ. Genetics of hearing loss. Hear J. 2019;4:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dai P, Huang L-H, Wang G-J, et al. Concurrent hearing and genetic screening of 180,469 neonates with follow-up in Beijing, China. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(4):803–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Dziendziel B, et al. Electro-natural stimulation in partial deafness treatment of adult cochlear implant users: long-term hearing preservation results. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2019;81(2–3):63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique. HNO. 1993;41(7):356–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland DR, Runge-Samuelson C. Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach. Trends Amplif. 2009;13(2):124–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajan GP, Kontorinis G, Kuthubutheen J. The effects of insertion speed on inner ear function during cochlear implantation: a comparison study. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar