Nuclear power in a de-carbonised future? A critical discourse analysis of nuclear energy debates and media framing in Australia

References

• Abdulla, A., A. A. Khourdajie, M. Babiker, Q. Bai, I. Bashmakov, C. Bataille, G. Berndes, et al. 2022. “Technical Summary.” In Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), edited by A. Jäger-Waldau, and T. Sapkota, 1–133. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FinalDraft_TechnicalSummary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arlt, D., A. Rauchfleisch, and M. S. Schäfer. 2019. “Between Fragmentation and Dialogue. Twitter Communities and Political Debate About the Swiss “Nuclear Withdrawal Initiative”.” Environmental Communication 13 (4): 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1430600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2020. Australian Broadcasting Corporation Annual Report 2019-2020. Australian Government. Retrieved 06/09/2022 from https://www.transparency.gov.au/annual-reports/australian-broadcasting-corporation/reporting-year/2019-20-60.
   Google Scholar
• Balkan-Sahin, S. 2019. “Nuclear Energy as a Hegemonic Discourse in Turkey.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 21 (4): 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2018.1506282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, L. D. 2009. “Discourse Analysis.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, edited by R. Kitchin, and N. Thrift, 215–221. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., I. Lorenzoni, N. F. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, and P. Simmons. 2008. “Reframing Nuclear Power in the UK Energy Debate: Nuclear Power, Climate Change Mitigation and Radioactive Waste.” Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 17 (2): 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, D. K., K. Haynes, R. van den Honert, J. McAneney, and W. Poortinga. 2014. “Nuclear Power in Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion Regarding Climate Change and the Fukushima Disaster.” Energy Policy 65: 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J., and C. Bulcaen. 2000. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 29 (1): 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borriello, A., P. Burke, and J. Rose. 2019. “Consumers’ Preferences for Different Energy Mixes in Australia.” International Choice Modelling Conference, Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. 2018. “Mass Media and Environmental Politics.” In The Politics of the Environment, edited by C. Okereke, 101–115. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. 2008. “Media (Ted) Discourse and Society: Rethinking the Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journalism Studies (London, England) 9 (2): 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, T., and L. R. Waugh. 2020. Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2009. “Discourse.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, edited by R. Kitchin, and N. Thrift, 211–214. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cronshaw, I. 2020. Australian Electricity Options: Nuclear. Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp2021/AustralianElectricityOptionsNuclear.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, C., F. Brereton, S. Mooney, D. Conway, and E. O’Neill. 2019. “Nuclear Frames in the Irish Media: Implications for Conversations on Nuclear Power Generation in the age of Climate Change.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 110: 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. 2011. “Acclimatizing Nuclear? Climate Change, Nuclear Power and the Reframing of Risk in the UK News Media.” International Communication Gazette 73 (1-2): 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386744.
   Google Scholar
• Eckermann, D. 2018. History of Australia’s Nuclear Prohibition - That day in December. Bright New World. https://www.brightnewworld.org/media/2018/10/18/history-of-australias-nuclear-prohibition-5ceab.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., J. Mulderrig, and R. Wodak. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2nd ed., edited by T. A. van Dijk, 357–378. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1979. The History of Sexuality. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003. Madness and Civilization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., M. Hassall, G. Muriuki, C. Warnaar-Notschaele, E. McFarland, and P. Ashworth. 2018. “The Demographics of Nuclear Power: Comparing Nuclear Experts’, Scientists’ and Non-Science Professionals’ Views of Risks, Benefits and Values.” Energy Research & Social Science 46: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbs, M. 2018. The Future of Nuclear Power in China. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/433874/the-future-of-nuclear-power-in-china/1404928/.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. 2023. IAEA Power Reactor Information System https://pris.iaea.org/pris/.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2023. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Core Writing Team, edited by H. Lee, and J. Romero, 1–34. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., S. Allan, and I. Welsh. 2000. The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, P. 2022. Australia’s Uranium Mines: Past and Present. Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Former_Committees/uranium/report/c07.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., and B. Barratt. 2022. “The Role of the Media in Staging air Pollution: The Controversy on Extreme air Pollution Along Oxford Street and Other Debates on Poor air Quality in London.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420981607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, H. M., and R. Lemke. 2016. “Instrumentalizing Fukushima: Comparing Media Coverage of Fukushima in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.” Political Communication 33 (3): 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1022240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. 2005. “One Hundred Years of Nuclear Discourse: Four Master Themes and Their Implications for Environmental Communication.” In The Environmental Communication Yearbook, edited by S. L. Senecah, 1 ed., 49–72. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhof, A. M., and J.-H. Meyer. 2014. “Global Protest Against Nuclear Power. Transfer and Transnational Exchange in the 1970s and 1980s.” Historical Social Research (Köln) 3 (1): 165–190. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.39.2014.1.165-190.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochvíl, P., and M. Mišík. 2020. “Bad External Actors and Good Nuclear Energy: Media Discourse on Energy Supplies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Energy Policy 136: Article 111058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S. 2017. “Characteristics of the Mass Media’s Coverage of Nuclear Energy and its Risk: A Literature Review.” Sociology Compass 11 (7): Article e12490. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, D. 2021. “Atomic Testing in Australia: Memories, Mobilizations and Mistrust.” In Remembering Social Movements: Activism and Memory, edited by S. Berger, S. Scalmer, and C. Wicke, 95–112. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malatesta, T. 2021. “The Environmental, Economic, and Social Performance of Nuclear Technology in Australia.” Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science 7 (4): Article 041202. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCalman, C. 2019. “Nuclear Heresy: Environmentalism as Implicit Religion.” (Publication Number uk.bl.Ethos.767296) (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Sheffield. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/22794/.
   Google Scholar
• McCalman, C., and S. Connelly. 2019. “Destabilizing Environmentalism: Epiphanal Change and the Emergence of pro-Nuclear Environmentalism.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (5): 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1119675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCausland, S. 2001. “Voices of Opposition: Documenting Australian Protest Movements.” Archives and Manuscripts 29 (2): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.206263861653015.
   Google Scholar
• McGaurr, L. C., and E. Lester. 2009. “Complementary Problems, Competing Risks: Climate Change, Nuclear Energy and the Australian.” In Climate Change and the Media, edited by T. Boyce, and J. Lewis, 174–185. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, P. 1996. “Contested Terrains: Politics, Stories and Discourses of Sustainability.” Environmental Politics 5 (1): 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019608414247.
   Google Scholar
• Mercado-Sáez, M.-T., E. Marco-Crespo, and À Álvarez-Villa. 2019. “Exploring News Frames, Sources and Editorial Lines on Newspaper Coverage of Nuclear Energy in Spain.” Environmental Communication 13 (4): 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1435558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., and H. Daniel. 2021. Australia Nuclear Submarine Deal: Aukus Defence Pact with US and UK Means $90bn Contract with France Will be Scrapped. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/sep/16/australia-nuclear-submarine-deal-contract-france-scrapped-defence-pact-us-uk.
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Benefits Center. 2022. History of Bikini Atoll. https://www.bikiniatoll.info/history-of-bikini-atoll/.
   Google Scholar
• Nolt, J. 2022. “Nuclear Power.” In The Routledge Companion to Environmental Ethics, edited by B. Hale, A. Light, and L. Lawhon, 338–348. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Engineering International. 2022. Australian Submarine Deal Sparks Debate About Nuclear Energy. https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newsaustralian-submarine-deal-sparks-debate-about-nuclear-energy-9156685.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie-White, T. 2015. “Australia’s Rocky Nuclear Past and Uncertain Future.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71 (5): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215599783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osička, J., and F. Černoch. 2022. “European Energy Politics After Ukraine: The Road Ahead.” Energy Research & Social Science 91: Article 102757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmero, C. M. 2019. “Nuclearism: Media Discourse, Image-Schemata, and the Cold war.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 11 (2): 145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, D. 1984. The Roots of Modern Environmentalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 2021. “Enlightenment Environmentalism: A Humanistic Response to Climate Change.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 33 (2): 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pioro, I., R. Duffey, P. Kirillov, and N. Dort-Goltz. 2020. “Current Status of Reactors Deployment and Small Modular Reactors Development in the World.” Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science 6 (4), https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzi, B. G., M. Cotton, G. Napolitano, and R. Barkemeyer. 2017. “Rebirth, Devastation and Sickness: Analyzing the Role of Metaphor in Media Discourses of Nuclear Power.” Environmental Communication 11 (5): 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1157506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. 2019. “Building Theory from Media Ideology: Coding for Power in Journalistic Discourse.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 43 (1): 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859918774797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers-Hayden, T., F. Hatton, and I. Lorenzoni. 2011. “‘Energy Security’ and ‘Climate Change’: Constructing UK Energy Discursive Realities.” Global Environmental Change 21 (1): 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser, M., H. Ritchie, and P. Rosado. 2022. Nuclear Energy. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/nuclear-energy.
   Google Scholar
• Roy Morgan Research. 2022. Australian Newspaper Readership. Think News Brands. https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/total-news-readership-continues-to-grow-up-0-9-per-cent-for-the-12-months-to-march-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Sarlós, G. 2015. “Risk Perception and Political Alienism: Political Discourse on the Future of Nuclear Energy in Hungary.” Central European Journal of Communication 8 (14): 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, T. 2013. ““Rotten to the core”: Exposing America’s energy-media complex in The China Syndrome.” Cinema Journal 52 (2): 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2013.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellenberger, M. 2020. Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts us all. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, I., A. Agee, M. R. Scott, and D. Endres. 2019. “The Discursive Construction of the Anti-Nuclear Activist.” In Networking Argument, edited by C. Winkler, 114–121. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, L. 2020. “Techno-economic Assessment of the Australian co-Generation Opportunity Utilising Next Generation Nuclear Technology.” (Honours Thesis). University of Queensland. UQ eSpace. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:ca6cd8e.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy. 2022. The History of Nuclear Energy. Washington D.C. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/The%20History%20of%20Nuclear%20Energy_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. 2013. News as Discourse. 1 ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Munster, R., and C. Sylvest. 2015. “Pro-nuclear Environmentalism: Should we Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Nuclear Energy?” Technology and Culture 56 (4): 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2015.0107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossen, M. 2020. “Nuclear Energy in the Context of Climate Change: A Frame Analysis of the Dutch Print Media.” Journalism Studies 21 (10): 1439–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1760730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vujić, J., R. M. Bergmann, R. Škoda, and M. Miletić. 2012. “Small Modular Reactors: Simpler, Safer, Cheaper?” Energy 45 (1): 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. 1999. “Critical Discourse Analysis at the End of the 20th Century.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 32 (1-2): 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2022a. Australia’s Uranium. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/australia.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2022b. Australian Research Reactors and Synchrotron. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/appendices/australian-research-reactors.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2022c. Chernobyl Accident 1986. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/chernobyl-accident.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2022d. Fukushima Daiichi Accident https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-daiichi-accident.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2022e. Three Mile Island Accident. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/three-mile-island-accident.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, S.-J. 2012. “Nuclear Power for Climate Mitigation? Contesting Frames in Korean Newspapers.” Asia Europe Journal 10 (1): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-012-0326-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar