584
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Non-invasive brain intervention techniques used in patients with disorders of consciousness

, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 390-404 | Received 13 Dec 2019, Accepted 09 Mar 2020, Published online: 02 Apr 2020

References

  • Schnakers C, Monti MM. Disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: therapeutic options. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(6):573–579.
  • Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, et al. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(2):99–114.
  • Bernat JL. The natural history of chronic disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2010;75(3):206–207.
  • Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):68.
  • Naccache L. Minimally conscious state or cortically mediated state? Brain A J Neurol. 2018;141(4):949–960.
  • Giacino JT, Malone R. The vegetative and minimally conscious states. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;90:99–111.
  • Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Comprehensive systematic review update summary: disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(9): 1710–1719.
  • Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(9):1699–1709
  • Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):819–826.
  • Rezaei Haddad A, Lythe V, Green AL. Deep brain stimulation for recovery of consciousness in minimally conscious patients after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neuromodulation. 2019;22(4):373–379.
  • Vanhoecke J, Hariz M. Deep brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: Systematic review of cases and ethics. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(6):1013–1023.
  • Si J, Dang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Spinal cord stimulation frequency influences the hemodynamic response in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neurosci Bull. 2018;34(4):659–667.
  • Bai Y, Xia X, Li X, et al. Spinal cord stimulation modulates frontal delta and gamma in patients of minimally consciousness state. Neuroscience. 2017;346:247–254.
  • Yuan H, Silberstein SD. Vagus nerve and vagus nerve stimulation, a comprehensive review: part II. Headache. 2016;56(2):259–266.
  • Bourdillon P, Hermann B, Sitt JD, et al. Electromagnetic brain stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:223
  • Yavari F, Jamil A, Mosayebi Samani M, et al. Basic and functional effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)-an introduction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;85:81–92.
  • Jaberzadeh S, Bastani A, Zoghi M. Anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation: a novel technique to enhance corticospinal excitability. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(2):344–351.
  • Lapitska N, Gosseries O, Delvaux V, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in disorders of consciousness. Rev Neurosci. 2009;20(3-4):235–250.
  • Rollnik JD, Altenmuller E. Music in disorders of consciousness. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:190
  • Magee WL. Music in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of people with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(8):1331–1339.
  • Zhang Y, Song W. Transcranial direct current stimulation in disorders of consciousness: a review. Int J Neurosci. 2018;128(3):255–261.
  • Ragazzoni A, Cincotta M, Giovannelli F, et al. Clinical neurophysiology of prolonged disorders of consciousness: From diagnostic stimulation to therapeutic neuromodulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(9):1629–1646.
  • Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, et al. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(6):600–614.
  • Kotchoubey B, Pavlov YG, Kleber B. Music in research and rehabilitation of disorders of consciousness: psychological and neurophysiological foundations. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1763
  • Xia X, Yang Y, Guo Y, et al. Current status of neuromodulatory therapies for disorders of consciousness. Neurosci Bull. 2018;34(4):615–625
  • Harris-Love ML, Cohen LG. Noninvasive cortical stimulation in neurorehabilitation: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):84–93.
  • Tremblay S, Rogasch NC, Premoli I, et al. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(5):802–844.
  • Lapitskaya N, Gosseries O, De Pasqua V, et al. Abnormal corticospinal excitability in patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Stimul. 2013;6(4):590–597.
  • Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Sant’Angelo A, et al. Patients in a vegetative state following traumatic brain injury display a reduced intracortical modulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(10):1937–1941.
  • Ilmoniemi RJ, Kicic D. Methodology for combined TMS and EEG. Brain Topogr. 2010;22(4):233–248.
  • Gosseries O, Di H, Laureys S, et al. Measuring consciousness in severely damaged brains. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2014;37(1):457–478.
  • Qin P, Di H, Liu Y, et al. Anterior cingulate activity and the self in disorders of consciousness. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31(12):1993–2002.
  • Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, et al. Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science, 2005;309(5744):2228–32.
  • Ferrarelli F, Massimini M, Sarasso S, et al. Breakdown in cortical effective connectivity during midazolam-induced loss of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(6):2681–2686.
  • Rosanova M, Gosseries O, Casarotto S, et al. Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain. 2012;135(4):1308–1320.
  • Ragazzoni A, Pirulli C, Veniero D, et al. Vegetative versus minimally conscious states: a study using TMS-EEG, sensory and event-related potentials. Plos One. 2013;8(2):e196–e196.
  • Gosseries O, Sarasso S, Casarotto S, et al. On the cerebral origin of EEG responses to TMS: insights from severe cortical lesions. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(1):142–149.
  • Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, et al. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(198):198ra105–198ra105.
  • Casarotto S, Comanducci A, Rosanova M, et al. Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(5):718–729.
  • Bodart O, Gosseries O, Wannez S, et al. Measures of metabolism and complexity in the brain of patients with disorders of consciousness. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;14:354–362.
  • Bai Y, Xia X, Kang J, et al. Evaluating the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on disorders of consciousness by using TMS-EEG. Front Neurosci. 2016;10(Pt 4):473.
  • Wu M, Wu Y, Yu Y, et al. Effects of theta burst stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in disorders of consciousness. Brain Stimul. 2018;11(6):1382–1384.
  • Manganotti P, Formaggio E, Storti SF, et al. Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on brain excitability in severely brain-injured patients in minimally conscious or vegetative state. Brain Stimul. 2013;6(6):913–921.
  • Xie Y, Zhang T, Chen AC. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Recovery of Stroke Patients With Disturbance of Consciousness. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(3):674–675.
  • Liu X, Meng F, Gao J, et al. Behavioral and resting state functional connectivity effects of high frequency rTMS on disorders of consciousness: a sham-controlled study. Front Neurol. 2018;9:982.
  • Antonino Naro M, Russo M, Leo A, et al. A single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: preliminary results. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(7):603–613
  • Xia X, Liu Y, Bai Y, et al. Long-lasting repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates electroencephalography oscillation in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuroreport. 2017;28(15):1022–1029.
  • Cincotta M, Giovannelli F, Chiaramonti R, et al. No effects of 20 Hz-rTMS of the primary motor cortex in vegetative state: A randomised, sham-controlled study. Cortex. 2015;71:368–376.
  • Louise-Bender Pape T, Rosenow J, Lewis G, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-associated neurobehavioral gains during coma recovery. Brain Stimul. 2009;2(1):22–35.
  • Naro A, Bramanti A, Leo A, et al. Metaplasticity: A promising tool to disentangle chronic disorders of consciousness differential diagnosis. Int J Neur Syst. 2018;28(06):1750059.
  • Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997;48(5):1398–1403.
  • Conti CL, Nakamura-Palacios EM. Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex changes the drug-cued reactivity in the anterior cingulate cortex of crack-cocaine addicts. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(1):130–132.
  • Hummel FC, Voller B, Celnik P, et al. Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7(1):73.
  • Dimitri D, De Filippis D, Galetto V, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and psychosensory stimulation through DOCS scale in a minimally conscious subject. Neurocase. 2017;23(2):96–104.
  • Fregni F, Boggio PS, Santos MC, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2006;21(10):1693–1702.
  • Fregni F, Freedman S, Pascual-Leone A. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(2):188–191.
  • Nitsche MA, Boggio PS, Fregni F, et al. Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review. Exp Neurol. 2009;219(1):14–19.
  • Angelakis E, Liouta E, Andreadis N, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects in disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):283–289.
  • Yeh KL, Fong PY, Huang YZ. Intensity sensitive modulation effect of theta burst form of median nerve stimulation on the monosynaptic spinal reflex. Neural Plast. 2015;2015:1–8.
  • Cavaliere C, Aiello M, Di Perri C, et al. Functional connectivity substrates for tDCS response in minimally conscious state patients. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:257
  • Thibaut A, Di Perri C, Chatelle C, et al. Clinical response to tDCS depends on residual brain metabolism and grey matter integrity in patients with minimally conscious state. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(6):1116–1123.
  • Huang W, Wannez S, Fregni F, et al. Repeated stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex in patients in minimally conscious state: a sham-controlled randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(3):718–720.
  • Thibaut A, Bruno M-A, Ledoux D, et al. tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology. 2014;82(13):1112–1118.
  • Wu M, Yu Y, Luo L, et al. Efficiency of repetitive transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in disorders of consciousness: a randomized sham-controlled study. Neural Plast. 2019;2019:1–11.
  • Alonzo A, Brassil J, Taylor JL, et al. Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(3):208–213.
  • Thibaut A, Wannez S, Donneau A-F, et al. Controlled clinical trial of repeated prefrontal tDCS in patients with chronic minimally conscious state. Brain Inj. 2017;31(4):466–474.
  • Bai Y, Xia X, Kang J, et al. TDCS modulates cortical excitability in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;15:702–709.
  • Wach C, Krause V, Moliadze V, et al. Effects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability. Behav Brain Res. 2013;241:1–6.
  • Naro A, Bramanti P, Leo A, et al. Transcranial alternating current stimulation in patients with chronic disorder of consciousness: a possible way to cut the diagnostic Gordian knot? Brain Topogr. 2016;29(4):623–644.
  • Bergmann TO, Groppa S, Seeger M, et al. Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102(4):2303–2311.
  • Groppa S, Bergmann TO, Siems C, et al. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans. Neuroscience. 2010;166(4):1219–1225.
  • Naro A, Russo M, Leo A, et al. Cortical connectivity modulation induced by cerebellar oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness: A marker of covert cognition?. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(3):1845–1854.
  • Cai T, Xia X, Zhang H, et al. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation modulates neural activities in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Brain Stimul. 2019;12(6):1619–1621.
  • Tillmann B. Implicit investigations of tonal knowledge in nonmusician listeners. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1060(1):100–110.
  • Thaut MH. Neurologic Music Therapy in Cognitive Rehabilitation. Music Percept. 2010;27(4):281–285.
  • Zatorre RJ. Predispositions and plasticity in music and speech learning: neural correlates and implications. Science. 2013;342(6158):585–589.
  • Koelsch S. Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14(3):131–137.
  • Schellenberg EG. Exposure to music: the truth about the consequences. 2006.
  • Kotz SA, Gunter TC, Wonneberger S. The basal ganglia are receptive to rhythmic compensation during auditory syntactic processing: ERP patient data. Brain Lang. 2005;95(1):70–71.
  • Kotz SA, Gunter TC. Can rhythmic auditory cuing remediate language-related deficits in Parkinson’s disease? Ann NY Acad Sci. 2015;1337(1):62–68.
  • Przybylski L. Rhythmic auditory stimulation influences syntactic processing in children with developmental language disorders. Neuropsychology. 2013; 27(1):121–131.
  • Magee WL. Music therapy with patients in low awareness states: approaches to assessment and treatment in multidisciplinary care. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15(3-4):522–536.
  • Magee WL. Development of a music therapy assessment tool for patients in low awareness states. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(4):319–324.
  • Riganello F, Cortese MD, Arcuri F, et al. How can music influence the autonomic nervous system response in patients with severe disorder of consciousness? Front Neurosci. 2015;9:461
  • Okumura Y, Asano Y, Takenaka S, et al. Brain activation by music in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state following diffuse brain injury. Brain Inj. 2014;28(7):944–950.
  • Heine L, Castro M, Martial C, et al. Exploration of functional connectivity during preferred music stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1704
  • Li J, Shen J, Liu S, et al. Responses of patients with disorders of consciousness to habit stimulation: a quantitative EEG study. Neurosci Bull. 2018;34(4):691–699.
  • Hashmi JT, Huang Y-Y, Osmani BZ, et al. Role of low-level laser therapy in neurorehabilitation. PM R. 2010;2(12 Suppl 2):S292–S305.
  • Lohse-Busch H, Reime U, Falland R. Symptomatic treatment of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome with transcranially focused extracorporeal shock waves. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(2):235–244.
  • Werner C, Byhahn M, Hesse S. Non-invasive brain stimulation to promote alertness and awareness in chronic patients with disorders of consciousness: Low-level, near-infrared laser stimulation vs. focused shock wave therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(4):561–569.
  • Bystritsky A, Korb AS, Douglas PK, et al. A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul. 2011;4(3):125–136.
  • Monti MM, Schnakers C, Korb AS, et al. Non-invasive ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: a first-in-man report. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(6):940–941.
  • He W, Wang X, Shi H, et al. Auricular acupuncture and vagal regulation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:1–6.
  • Yu Y-T, Yang Y, Wang L-B, et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in disorders of consciousness monitored by fMRI: The first case report. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(2):328–330.
  • Thies M, Zrenner C, Ziemann U, et al. Sensorimotor mu-power is positively related to corticospinal excitability. Brain Stimul. 2018;11(5):1119–1122.
  • Zrenner C, et al. Real-time EEG-defined excitability states determine efficacy of TMS-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2017;11(2):S1935861X17309725.
  • Grossman N, Bono D, Dedic N, et al. Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields. Cell. 2017;169(6):1029–1041.e16.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.