Enhancing theoretical understanding of a practical biology course using active and self-directed learning strategies

References

• Adams, D. J. 2009. “Current Trends in Laboratory Class Teaching in University Bioscience Programmes.” Bioscience Education 13 (1): 1–14.10.3108/beej.13.3
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D., and K. Tanner. 2005. “Infusing Active Learning into the Large-enrollment Biology Class: Seven Strategies, from the Simple to Complex.” Cell Biology Education 4 (4): 262–268.10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Collis, M., A. Gibson, I. Hughes, G. Sayers, and M. Todd. 2008. “The Student View of 1st year Laboratory Work in the Biosciences – Score Gamma?” Bioscience Education 11 (1): 1–14.10.3108/beej.11.2
   Google Scholar
• Development of Django. 2016. https://www.djangoproject.com.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., and B. J. Reiser. 2007. “Reasoning Across Ontologically Distinct Levels: Students’ Understandings of Molecular Genetics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (7): 938–959.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis, J., J. Coutu, and O. Laneuville. 2013. “Application of Linear Mixed-effect Models for the Analysis of Exam Scores: Online Video Associated with Higher Scores for Undergraduate Students with Lower Grades.” Computers & Education 66: 64–73.10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, H., and K. Colthorpe. 2007. “The Efficacy of Interactive Lecturing for Students with Diverse Science Backgrounds.” Advances in Physiology Education 31 (1): 41–44.10.1152/advan.00107.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, et al. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–8415.10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güzer, B., and H. Caner. 2014. “The Past, Present and Future of Blended Learning: An in Depth Analysis of Literature.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 116: 4596–4603.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992
   Google Scholar
• Halme, D. G., J. Khodor, R. Mitchell, and G. C. Walker. 2006. “A Small-scale Concept-based Laboratory Component: The Best of Both Worlds.” CBE life sciences education 5 (1): 41–51.10.1187/cbe.05-02-0065
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handelsman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, R. DeHaan, et al. 2004. “Scientific Teaching.” Science 304 (5670): 521–522.10.1126/science.1096022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 1982. “The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research.” Review of Educational Research 52 (2): 201–217.10.3102/00346543052002201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 2004. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-first Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and R. Mamlok-Naaman. 2007. “The Laboratory in Science Education – The State of Art.” Chemical Education Research and Practice 8: 105–107.10.1039/B7RP90003A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. C., and M. J. Hannafin. 2011. “Scaffolding Problem Solving in Technology-enhanced learNing Environments (TELEs): Bridging Research and Theory with Practice.” Computers & Education 56 (2): 403–417.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckie, D. B., J. J. Maleszewski, S. D. Loznak, and M. Krha. 2004. “Infusion of Collaborative Inquiry Throughout a Biology Curriculum Increases Student Learning: A Four-year Study of “Teams and Streams”.” Advances in Physiology Education 28 (4): 199–209.10.1152/advan.00025.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunetta, V. N., A. Hofstein, M. P. Clough. 2007. Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory and practice ( Chap. 15). New York: Routeledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marbach-Ad, G., and R. Stavy. 2000. “Students’ Cellular and Molecular Explanations of Genetic Phenomena.” Journal of Biological Education 34 (4): 200–205.10.1080/00219266.2000.9655718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, K. Jones. 2010. Evaluation of Evidence-based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, D.C. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. 2006. “Where’s the Evidence That Active Learning Works?” AJP: Advances in Physiology Education 30 (4): 159–167.10.1152/advan.00053.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. J., J. McNear, and M. J. Metz. 2013. “A Comparison of Traditional and Engaging Lecture Methods in a Large, Professional-level Course.” AJP: Advances in Physiology Education 37 (4): 347–355.10.1152/advan.00050.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. J., and A. B. Burgess. 2003. “Inquiry-based Laboratory Course Improves Students’ Ability to Design Experiments and Interpret Data.” AJP: Advances in Physiology Education 27 (1): 26–33.10.1152/advan.00028.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parslow, G. R. 2012. “Commentary: Allocating the Blend in Blended Learning.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 40 (4): 276–276.10.1002/bmb.v40.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. R., A. L. Robertson, J. Batzli, M. Harris, and S. Miller. 2008. “Aligning Goals, Assessments, and Activities: An Approach to Teaching PCR and Gel Electrophoresis.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 7 (1): 96–106.10.1187/cbe.07-07-0052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3): 223–231.10.1002/jee.2004.93.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prober, C. G., and C. Heath. 2012. “Lecture Halls without Lectures – A Proposal for Medical Education.” New England Journal of Medicine 366 (18): 1657–1659.10.1056/NEJMp1202451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissing, S. W., and J. G. Cogan. 2009. “Can an Inquiry Approach Improve College Student Learning in a Teaching Laboratory?” CBE-Life Sciences Education 8 (1): 55–61.10.1187/cbe.08-05-0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. L., C. A. Smith, E. M. A. Gillam, and T. Wright. 2011. “The Concept lens Diagram: A New Mechanism for Presenting Biochemistry Content in Terms of “Big Ideas”.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 39 (4): 267–279.10.1002/bmb.20517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sams, A., and J. Bergmann. 2013. “Flip Your Students’ Learning.” Technology-Rich Learning 70: 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schonborn, K. J., and T. R. Anderson. 2006. “The Importance of Visual Literacy in the Education of Biochemists.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 34 (2): 94–102.10.1002/(ISSN)1539-3429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., and R. J. Shavelson. 2007. “Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-analysis Results.” Review of Educational Research 77 (4): 454–499.10.3102/0034654307310317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., and M. J. Hannafin. 2007. “Scaffolding in Technology-enhanced Learning Environments.” Interactive Learning Environments 15 (1): 27–46.10.1080/10494820600996972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southard, K., T. Wince, S. Meddleton, M. S. Bolger 2016. “Features of Knowledge Building in Biology: Understanding Undergraduate Students’ Ideas about Molecular Mechanisms.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 15 (1): ar7.10.1187/cbe.15-05-0114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert, Y., and L. S. Snell. 1999. “Interactive Lecturing: Strategies for Increasing Participation in Large Group Presentations.” Medical Teacher 21 (1): 37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teri, S., A. Acai, D. Griffith, Q. Mahmoud, D. W. L. Ma, and G. Newton. 2014. “Student Use and Pedagogical Impact of a Mobile Learning Application.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 42 (2): 121–135.10.1002/bmb.v42.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare, R. N. 2002. “Visualizing Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 79 (11): 1290–1291.10.1021/ed079p1290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar