1,142
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Psychosocial factors impacting STEM career selection

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 446-458 | Received 26 Aug 2016, Accepted 06 Feb 2017, Published online: 24 Mar 2017

References

  • Adedokun, O. A., Bessenbacher, A. B., Parker, L. C., Kirkham, L. L., & Burgess, W. D. (2013). Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students' aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 940–951.
  • Annetta, L. A. (2008). Serious educational games: From theory to practice. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
  • Annetta, L. A. (2010). The “I's” have it: A framework for serious educational game design. Review of General Psychology, 14, 105–112.
  • Annetta, L. A., Frazier, W. M., Folta, E., Holmes, S., Lamb, R., & Cheng, M. T. (2013). Science teacher efficacy and extrinsic factors toward professional development using video games in a design-based research model: the next generation of STEM learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 47–61.
  • Annetta, L. A., Lamb, R., Minogue, J., Folta, E., Holmes, S., Vallett, D., & Cheng, R. (2014). Safe science classrooms: Teacher training through serious educational games. Information Sciences, 264, 61–74.
  • Annetta, L. A., Vallett, D., Fusarelli, B., Lamb, R., Cheng, M. T., Holmes, S., & Thurmond, B. (2014). Investigating science interest in a Game-Based learning project. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33, 381–407.
  • Baki, A., Kosa, T., & Guven, B. (2011). A comparative study of the effects of using dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on the spatial visualization skills of pre-service mathematics teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 291–310.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
  • Bodzin, A. M. (2011). The implementation of a geospatial information technology (GIT)-supported land use change curriculum with urban middle school learners to promote spatial thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 281–300.
  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499.
  • Brown, S., & Lent, R. (2013). Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Cantrell, P., & Ewing-Taylor, J. (2009). Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 295–303.
  • Chakravarti, I. M., Laha, R. G., & Roy, J. (1967). Handbook of methods of applied statistics (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.
  • Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, 2, 63–79.
  • Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., & Kinzler, K. D. (2012). The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: A neurodevelopmental study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 209–220.
  • Dutta-Moscato, J., Gopalakrishnan, V., Lotze, M. T., & Becich, M. J. (2014). Creating a pipeline of talent for informatics: STEM initiative for high school students in computer science, biology, and biomedical informatics. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 5, 1–12.
  • Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding student learning (Routledge Revivals). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. C., Stowe, K. A., & Showman, R. (2010). Translating expertise into effective instruction: The impacts of cognitive task analysis (CTA) on lab report quality and student retention in the biological sciences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1165–1185.
  • Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making. Paris, France: UNESCO.
  • Ford, C. L., & Yore, L. D. (2012). Toward convergence of critical thinking, metacognition, and reflection: Illustrations from natural and social sciences, teacher education, and classroom practice. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education (pp. 251–271). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
  • Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Saad, Z. S., Handwerker, D. A., Inati, S. J., Brenowitz, N., & Bandettini, P. A. (2012). Whole-brain, time-locked activation with simple tasks revealed using massive averaging and model-free analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 5487–5492.
  • Hansen, M., & Gonzalez, T. (2014). Investigating the relationship between STEM learning principles and student achievement in math and science. American Journal of Education, 120, 139–171.
  • Holland, J. L. (1963). Explorations of a theory of vocational choice and achievement: ii. A four-year prediction study: Monograph Supplement 4-VI2. Psychological Reports, 12, 547–594.
  • Jones, B. F. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Jones, G., Taylor, A., & Forrester, J. H. (2011). Developing a scientist: A retrospective look. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1653–1673.
  • Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 302–317.
  • Kappes, A., Oettingen, G., & Pak, H. (2012). Mental contrasting and the self-regulation of responding to negative feedback. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 845–857.
  • Kellogg, R. (2003). Cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Kosslyn, S. M., Di Girolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Mental rotation of objects versus hands: Neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology, 35, 151–161.
  • Krapp, A. (2007). An educational-psychological conceptualization of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 5–21.
  • Krupat, E., Sprague, J. M., Wolpaw, D., Haidet, P., Hatem, D., & O'Brien, B. (2011). Thinking critically about critical thinking: ability, disposition or both? Medical Education, 45, 625–635
  • Lamb, R. L. (2014). Examination of allostasis and online laboratory simulations in a middle school science classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 224–234.
  • Lamb, R. L. (2013). The application of cognitive diagnostic approaches via neural network analysis of serious educational games. Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
  • Lamb, R. L., Akmal, T, & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of cognition-priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 410–437.
  • Lamb, R. L., & Annetta, L. (2012). The use of online modules and the effect on student outcomes in a high school chemistry class. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 603–613.
  • Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2012). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 643–668.
  • Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Vallett, D. B., & Sadler, T. D. (2014). Cognitive diagnostic like approaches using neural-network analysis of serious educational videogames. Computers & Education, 70, 92–104.
  • Lamb, R. L., Cavagnetto, A., & Akmal, T. (2016). Examination of the nonlinear dynamic systems associated with science student cognition while engaging in science information processing. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 187–205.
  • Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D. B., Akmal, T., & Baldwin, K. (2014). A computational modeling of student cognitive processes in science education. Computers & Education, 79, 116–125.
  • Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D. B., & Annetta, L. (2014). Development of a short-form measure of science and technology self-efficacy using Rasch analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 641–657.
  • Learning.com. (n.d.). Are your students ready for the 21st century? Retrieved from http://www.learning.com/solutions/tools
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006a). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 12–35.
  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006b). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 236–247.
  • Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean. American Psychologist, 70, 487–498.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Pearson, J., Crissey, S. R., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (2009). Gendered fields: Sports and advanced course taking in high school. Sex Roles, 61, 519–535.
  • Penuel, W. R., & Fishman, B. J. (2012). Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 281–304.
  • Raykov, T., Dimitrov, D. M., & Asparouhov, T. (2010). Evaluation of scale reliability with binary measures using latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 265–279.
  • Rumiati, R. I., Tomasino, B., Vorano, L., Umiltà, C., & De Luca, G. (2001). Selective deficit of imagining finger configurations. Cortex, 37, 730–733.
  • Sirigu, A., & Duhamel, J. R. (2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 910–919.
  • Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 1143–1179.
  • Tal, T., & Dierking, L. D. (2014). Learning science in everyday life. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 251–259.
  • Tomasino, B., Toraldo, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2003). Dissociation between the mental rotation of visual images and motor images in unilateral brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition, 51, 368–371.
  • Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96, 411–427.
  • Sharon, G., Stern, R., Felner, A., & Sturtevant, N. R. (2012). Conflict-based search for optimal multi-agent path finding. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. Toronto, Canada: AAAI Press.
  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
  • Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 1151–1158.
  • Spencer, I., & Feng, J. (2010). Video games and spatial cognition. Review of General Psychology, 14, 92–104.
  • Somerville, L. H., Jones, R. M., Ruberry, E. J., Dyke, J. P., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2013). The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychological Science, 24, 1554–1562.
  • Stewart, I., & Panksepp, I. (2012). Biological foundations: The SEEKING system as an affective source for motivation and cognition. In S. Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 109–137). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Torrance, E. P., & Myers, R. E. (1970). Creative learning and teaching. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead & Company.
  • Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–58.
  • Yamamoto, Y., & Nakakoji, K. (2005). Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63, 513–535.
  • Zacks, J., Rypma, B., Gabrieli, J. D., Tversky, B., & Glover, G. H. (1999). Imagined transformations of bodies: An fMRI investigation. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1029–1040.
  • Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.