Elementary school–wide implementation of a blended learning program for reading intervention

References

• Abdi, H. (2010). The Greenhouse-Geisser correction. In N. Salkand (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. (2015). A rising share of the U.S. black population is foreign born: 9 percent are immigrants; and while most are from the Caribbean, Africans drive recent growth. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2015/04/2015-04-09_black-immigrants_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• August, D., McCardle, P., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Developing literacy in English language learners: Findings from a review of the experimental research. School Psychology Review, 43, 490–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Ross, S. G., Greene, D. J., Mitchell, R. C., & Whitehouse, M. H. (2012). Effects of the helping early literacy with practice strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program with Latino English language learners: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 134–149.
   Google Scholar
• The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. (2009). ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 summative assessment. Retrieved from http://www.wida.us/.
   Google Scholar
• Boushey, G., & Moser, J. (2006). The Daily 5. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Campaign for Grade-Level Reading. (2014). 3rd grade reading success matters: The campaign. Retrieved from http://gradelevelreading.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/009-14-GLR_Brochure_2-27.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C., & Smith, L. L. (2004). Acquisition of blending skills: Comparisons among body-coda, onset-rime, and phoneme blending tasks. Reading Psychology, 25, 261–272.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7, 198–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K-12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction of the theory of hybrids. San Francisco, CA: Clayton Christensen Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Is-K-12-Blended-Learning-Disruptive.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, S., Bosman, A. M., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 318–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Anthony, J. L., Parker, R., & Hasbrouck, J. E. (2004). Effects of two tutoring programs on the English reading development of Spanish-English bilingual students. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59, 423–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2012). A guide to personalized learning: Suggestions for the race to top-district competition. San Mateo, CA: Clayton Christensen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fiester, L. (2010). Early warning!: Why reading by the end of third grade matters, KIDS COUNT special report. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fiester, L. (2013). Early warning confirmed: A research update on third-grade reading. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Rivera, M., Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J, & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Research-based recommendations for the use of accommodations in large-scale assessments. Portsmouth, NH: Center on Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.centeroninstruction.org.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, J. (2015). Three false dichotomies in blended learning. San Mateo, CA: Clayton Christensen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., & Freeman, Y. (1988). Sheltered English instruction. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9210/english.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, E. (2015). Inequalities at the starting gate: Cognitive and noncognitive skills gaps between 2010-2011 kindergarten classmates. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Geva, E., & Yaghoub Zadeh, Z. (2006). Reading efficiency in native English-speaking and English-as-a-second-language children: The role of oral proficiency and underlying cognitive-linguistic processes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 31–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. (2015). Afro-Latin: The many faces of Black America. Homeroom: The Official Blog of the U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://blog.ed.gov/2015/10/afro-latin-the-many-faces-of-black-america/.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. A., & Close, L. (2002). Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kindergartners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 93–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard, A. T. (2015). Global blended learning practices for teaching and learning, leadership and professional development. Journal of International Education Research, 11, 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning. Mountain View, CA: Innosight Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. P., Perry, J., & Shamir, H. (2010). Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation. Computers & Education, 55, 209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A. (2015). Personalized learning playbook. Washington, DC: Education Elements.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2014). Effects of using mobile devices in blended learning for English reading comprehension. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17, 64–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Koda, K., Siegel, L. S., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Development of literacy of language minority learners. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth (pp. 75–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2014). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., Cantor, B. G., Anthony, J. L., & Goldstein, H. (2003). A computer-assisted instruction phonological sensitivity program for preschool children at-risk for reading problems. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 248–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners' academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54, 901–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., Hook, P. E., & McCabe, R. (2006). The efficacy of computer-based supplementary phonics programs for advancing reading skills in at-risk elementary students. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2011a). Efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for the development of early literacy skills in young children. Reading Psychology, 32, 172–196.
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2011b). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction to support reading acquisition in English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Macaruso, P., & Walker, A. (2008). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for advancing literacy skills in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 29, 266–287.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. (2015). Feds put spotlight on needs of black ELLs. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/10/21/feds-put-spotlight-on-needs-of-black.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. J., & Fox, B. J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 40, 315–332.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2009). Risk factors for learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age: Population-based estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 401–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The nation's report card: Reading 2009: National assessment of educational progress at grades 4 and 8. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2010458.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The condition of education: Family characteristic of school-age children. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cce.asp.
   Google Scholar
• National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2016). Title III state profiles. Silver Spring, MD: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards initiative: English language arts standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. M. (2008). From beginning to stellar: Five tips on developing skillful readers. Alexandria, VA: Center for Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Instruction/From-beginning-to-stellar-Five-tips-on-developing-skillful-readers.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson Education. (2010). GRADE scoring & reporting software: Sample reports, level 1. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Author. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/products/grade/gradeLevel1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G., Seaman, J., Shea, P., & Swan, K. (2012). Examining the extent and nature of online learning in American K–12 education: The research initiatives of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Rabbitt, B., & Kennedy, K. (2014). iNACOL blended learning teacher competency framework. Vienna, VA: International Association for K–12 Online Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., & Verma, S. (2015). Blended learning: The evolution of online and face-to-face education from 2008–2015. Promising practices in online learning. Vienna, VA: International Association for K–12 Online Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, C. D., Filler, J., & Higgins, K. (2012). Using primary language support via computer to improve reading comprehension skills of first-grade English language learners. Computers in the Schools, 29, 253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M. K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82, 1013–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, R. S., Abrami, P., Piquette-Tomei, N., Wood, E., Deleveaux, G., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., & Burgos, G. (2013). A pan-Canadian cluster randomized control effectiveness trial of the ABRACADABRA web-based literacy program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 310–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter, R., Macaruso, P., Kazakoff, E. R., & Brooke, E. (2015). Exploration of a blended learning approach to reading instruction for low SES students in early elementary grades. Computers in the Schools, 32, 183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley-Tremblay, J., & Eyer, J. (2009). Effect of the reading plus program on reading skills in second graders. Journal of Behavioral Optometry, 20(3), 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A. (2004). Migrant students with limited English proficiency can fast forword language™ Make a difference in their language skills and academic achievement? Remedial and Special Education, 25, 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Improving basic programs operated by local educational agencies (Title I, Part A). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. (2012). Civil rights data collection, 2011–2012. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2011). Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled first graders: How language minority status and pretest characteristics moderate treatment response. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 471–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Daal, V., & Reitsma, P. (2000). Computer-assisted learning to read and spell: Results from two pilot studies. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Education Sciences, 4, 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, M. (2009). Using computer-aided instruction to support the systematic practice of phonological skills in beginning readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. T. (2001). Group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Zakariya, S. B. (2015). Learning to read, reading to learn: Why third-grade is a pivotal year for mastering literacy. Alexandria, VA: Center For Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Policies/Learning-to-Read-Reading-to-Learn-At-a-Glance/Learning-to-Read-Reading-to-Learn-Full-Report-PDF.pdf.
   Google Scholar