Changing Their Minds: Enhancing Poststroke Occupational Performance Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

REFERENCES

• Adkins-Muir, D. L., & Jones, T. A. (2003). Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurology Research, 25, 780–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002). Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 609–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, K. K., Guan, C., Phua, K. S., Wang, C., Zhao, L., Teo, L., & Chew, E. (2015). Facilitating effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, S79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J., Rorden, C., & Fridriksson, J. (2010). Using Transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke, 41, 1229–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio, P. S., Nunes, A., Rigonatti, S. P., Nitsche, M. A., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fregni, F. (2007). Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25, 123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini, N., Vallar, G., Casati, C., Laitf, L. A., El-Nazer, R., Williams, J., & Fregni, F. (2011). Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 819–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradnam, L. V., Stinear, C. M., Barber, P. A., & Byblow, W. D. (2012). Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Brem, A., Unterburger, E., Speight, I., & Jäncke, L. (2014). Treatment of visuospatial neglect with biparietal tDCS and cognitive training: a single case study. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buetefisch, C. M. (2015). Role of the contralesional hemisphere in post-stroke recovery of upper extremity motor function. Frontiers in Neurology, 16, 214.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. J., Shuster, M., O'Hara, E., Hurley, K., Middlebrooks, D., & Guilkey, K. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26, 162–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M. C., Kim, D. Y., & Park, D. H. (2015). Enhancement of cortical excitability and lower limb motor function in patients with stroke by transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 8, 561–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, V., Gigliaa, G., Brighinaa, F., Indovinoa, S., & Fierroa, B. (2015). Ipsilesional and contralesional regions participate in the improvement of poststroke aphasia: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neurocase, 21, 479–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creutzfeld, O. D., Fromm, G. H., & Kapp, H. (1962). Influence of transcranial d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. Experimental Neurology, 5, 436–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flöel, A., Meinzer, M., Kirstein, R., Nijhof, S., Deppe, M., Knecht, S., & Breitenstein, C. (2011). Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke, 42, 2065–2067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Mansur, C. G., Wagner, T., Ferreira, M. J., Lima, M. C., & Nitsche, M. A. (2005). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport, 16, 1551–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go, A. S., Mozaffarian, D., Roger, V. L., Benjamin, E. J., Berry, J. D., Blaha, M. J., & Turner, M. B. (2013). Heart Disease and stroke statistics-2014 update. Circulation, 129, e28–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori, Y., Moriwaki, A., & Hori, Y. (1990). Biphasic effects of polarizing current on adenosine sensitive generation of cyclic AMP in rat cerebral cortex. Neuroscience, 116, 320–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss, W. D., & Thiel, A. (2006). A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia. Brain and Language, 98, 118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, S., Waldner, S., Mehrholz, J., Tomelleri, C., Pohl, M., & Werner, C. (2011). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: An exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 838–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, S., Wernera, C., Schonhardta, E. M., Bardelebena, A., Jenrichb, W., & Kirkerc, S. (2007). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: A pilot study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25, 9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, F. C., Celnik, P., Giraux, P., Floel, A., Wu, W. H., Gerloff, C., & Cohen, L. G. (2005). Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain, 128, 490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, F. C., Voller, B., Celnik, P., Floel, A., Giraux, P., Gerloff, C., & Cohen, L. G. (2006). Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neuroscience, 7, 73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, N., Aftabuddin, M., Moriwaki, A., Hattori, Y., & Hori, Y. (1995). Increase in the calcium level following anodal polarization in the rat brain. Brain Research, 684, 206–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, D. T., Norton, J. A., Rov, F. D., & Gorassini, M. A. (2007). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katalanic, O. M., Harvey, L. A., & Herbert, R. D. (2011). Effectiveness of stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures in people with neurologic conditions: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 91, 11–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly-Hayes, M., Beiser, A., Kase, C. S., Scaramucci, A., D'Agostino, R. B., & Wolf, P. A. (2003). The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the framingham study. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 12, 119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khedr, E. M., Shawky, O. A., El-Hammady, D. H., Rothwell, J. C., Darwish, E. S., Mostafa, O. M., & Tohamy, A. M. (2013). Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27, 592–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. Y., Ohn, S. H., Yang, E. J., Park, C. L., & Jung, K. J. (2009). Enhancing motor performance by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 829–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. Y., Lim, J. Y., Kang, E. K., You, D. S., Oh, M. K., Oh, B. M., & Paik, N. J. (2010). Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 879–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim, J. A., Bruneau, R., Vandenberg, P., MacDonald, R., Mulrooney, R., & Pocock, D. (2003). Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurology Research, 25, 789–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim, J. A., & Jones, T. A. (2008). Principles of experience-dependent neuroplasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 51, S225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, M., Hana, S., Park, S., Seoa, J., & Kimb, Y. (2008). Improvement of visual scanning after DC brain polarization of parietal cortex in stroke patients with spatial neglect. Neuroscience Letters, 448, 171–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi, R. V., Feigin, V. L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Mensah, G. A., Connor, M., Bennett, D. A., & Murray, C. (2013). Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet Global Health, 1, e259–e281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Chun, M. (2014). Combination transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality therapy for upper extremity training in patients with subacute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberg, R., Renga, V., Zhu, L. L., Nair, D., & Schlaug, G. (2010). Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology, 75, 2176–2184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malenka, R. C., & Nicoll, R. A. (1999). Long term potentiation—a decade of progress? Science, 285, 1870–1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Calpagnano, M., Campana, S., Razzano, C., Caltagirone, C., & Marini, A. (2013). tDCS over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech production in aphasia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Campana, S., Calpagnano, A., Razzano, C., Caltagirone, C., & Marini, A. (2014). Something to talk about: Enhancement of linguistic cohesion through tDCS in chronic non fluent aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 53, 246–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. J., Grimwood, P. D., & Morris, R. G. (2000). Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 649–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, D. B., Agnew, W. F., Yuen, T. G., & Bullara, L. (1990). Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 37, 996–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriwaki, A. (1991). Polarizing current increase noradrenaline-elicited accumulation of cyclic AMP in rat cerebral cortex. Brain Research, 544, 248–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, J., Figlewski, K., & Anderson, H. (2016). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and home-based occupational therapy for upper limb motor impairment following intercerebral hemorrhage: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 637–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, D. G., Renga, V., Lindenberg, R., Zhu, L., & Schlaug, G. (2011). Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain stimulation using tDCS. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29, 411–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Antal, A., Tergau, F., & Paulus, W. (2003). Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2220–2222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Physiology, 527, 633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001). Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology, 57, 1899–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo, R. J. (2006). Plasticity. NeuroRx, 3, 420–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nudo, R. J., & Friel, K. M. (1999). Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Revue Neurologique, 155, 713–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochi, M., Saeki, S., Oda, T., Matsushima, Y., & Hachisuka, K. (2013). Effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy on severely affected arms in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45, 137–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. J., Boe, S., & Levine, P. (2013). What are the “ingredients” of modified constraint-induced therapy? An evidence based review, recipe, and recommendations. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 31, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. J., Levin, L., Hermann, V., Dunning, K., & Levine, P. (2012). Longer versus shorter daily durations of electrical stimulation during task specific practice in moderately impaired stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. J., & Peters, H. (2014). Mental practice: applying motor PRACTICE and neuroplasticity principles to increase upper extremity function. Stroke, 45, 3454–3460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, A., Farmer, S. E., Brady, M. C., Langhorne, P., Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., & van Wijck, F. (2014). Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, CD010820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poreisz, C., Boros, K., Antal, A., & Paulus, W. (2007). Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Research Bulletin, 72, 208–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purpura, D. P., & McMurtry, J. G. (1965). Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 166–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rioult-Pedotti, M. S., Friedman, D., & Donoghue, J. P. (2000). Learning-induced LTP in the neocortex. Science, 290, 533–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, C., Sallustio, F., Legge, S., Stanzione, P., Koch G. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients. European Journal of Neurology, 20(1), 202–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & The Safety of TMS Consensus Group. (2009). Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 2008–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaug, G., Renga, V., & Nair, D. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Archives of Neurology, 65, 1571–1576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, M. K., Jee, S. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2013). Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on postural stability and lower extremity strength in hemiplegic stroke patients. Annals of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 759–765.
   Google Scholar
• Sparing, R., Thimm, M., Hesse, M. D., Küst, J., Karbe, H., & Fink, G. R. (2009). Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. Brain, 132, 3011–3020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahtis, V., Kaski, D., & Seemungal, B. M. (2014). The effect of single session bi-cephalic transcranial direct current stimulation on gait performance in sub-acute stroke: A pilot study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 32, 527–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, S., Takeda, K., Otaka, Y., Kita, K., Osu, R., Honda, M., & Watanabe, K. (2011). Single session of transcranial direct current stimulation transiently increases knee extensor force in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 565–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Mark, V. W., & Morris, D. M. (2006). The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Europa Medicophysica, 42, 241–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyson, S. F., & Kent, R. M. (2009). Orthotic devices after stroke and other non-progressive brain lesions. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD003694.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viana, R. T., Laurentinoa, G. E. C., Souzaa, R. P. J., Fonsecaa, J. B., Silva Filhoa, E. M., Diasa, E. N., & Monte-Silvaa, K. K. (2014). Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 34, 437–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S.L., Winstein, C.L., Miller, J.P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(17), 2095–2104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D., Qian, L., Zorowitz, R., Zhang, L., Qu, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2013). Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized sham-controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, D., Kim, D., Chun, M., Jung, S., & Park, S. (2011). Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke's area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain and Language, 119, 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimerman, M., Heise, K. F., Hoppe, J., Cohen, L. G., Gerloff, C., & Hummel, F. C. (2012). Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand. Stroke, 43, 2185–2191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar