References
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). Policy: Synoptic Reports for Major Tumour Types, March 2007. RCPA, Sydney 2007, http://www.rcpa.edu.au/applications/DocumentLibraryManager/upload/Synoptic%20Reports%20for%20Major%20Tumour%20Types.pdf (accessed May 2008)
- The Royal College of Pathologists. Standards and Datasets for Reporting Cancers. The Royal College of Pathologists, London 2008, http://www.rcpath.org/index.asp?PageID=254 (accessed May 2008)
- College of American Pathologists (CAP). Cancer Protocols and Checklists. CAP, Northfield, IL 2008, http://www.cap.org/apps/cap.portal?_nfpb=true&cntvwrPtlt_actionOverride=%2Fportlets%2FcontentViewer%2Fshow&_windowLabel=cntvwrPtlt&cntvwrPtlt%7BactionForm.contentReference%7D=cancer_protocols%2Fprotocols_index.html&_state=maximized&_pageLabel=cntvwr (accessed May 2008)
- Markel S F, Hirsh S D. Perspectives in pathology: synoptic surgical pathology reporting. Hum Pathol 1991; 22: 807–810
- Leong AS-Y. Dilemmas in Breast Disease: Synoptic/Checklist Reporting of Breast Biopsies: Has the time come?. Breast J 2001; 7: 271–274
- Scolyer R, Thompson J, Stretch S, McCarthy S. Collaboration between clinicians and pathologists: a necessity for the optimal management of melanoma patients. Cancer Forum 2005; 29: 76–81
- Cross S S, Feeley K M, Angel C A. The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 1998; 51: 481–482
- Rigby K, Brown S R, Lakin G, Blasitis M, Hoskie K B. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999; 81: 401–403
- Beattie G C, McAdam T K, Elliott S, Sloan J M, Irwin S T. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized pro-form: a comparative study. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 558–562
- Zarbo R J. Interinstitutional assessment of colorectal carcinoma surgical pathology report accuracy: a college of American Pathologists Q-proves study of practice patterns from 532 laboratories and 15 940 reports. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116: 1113–1119
- Hammond E H, Flinner R L. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 1171–1175
- Harvey J M, Sterret G F, McEvoy S, et al. Pathology reporting of breast cancers: trends in 1989–1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia. Pathology 2005; 37: 341–346
- Karim R Z, van den Berg K S, Colman M H, McCarthy S W, Thompson J F, Scolyer R A. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma. Histopathology 2008; 52: 130–138
- Verbeke C S, Leitch D, Menon K V, McMahon M J, Guillou P J, Anthoney A. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1232–1237
- Esposito I, Kleef J, Bergmann F, et al. Most pancreatic resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol, 20 March 2008 (e-pub ahead of print)
- Greene F L, Page D L, Fleming I D, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Springer, New York 2002
- Miettinen O, Nurminen M. Comparative analysis of two rates. Stat Med 1985; 4: 213–226
- Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979; 6: 65–70
- Böttger T C, Störkel S, Wellek S, Störkel M, Junginger T. Factors influencing survival after resection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer 1994; 73: 63–73
- Tsuchiya R, Oribe T, Noda T. Size of the tumor and other factors influencing prognosis of carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol 1985; 80: 459–462
- Roder J D, Ott K. Cancer of the pancreas. Prognostic Factors in Cancer, M K Gospodarowicz, D E Henson, R VP Hutter, B O'Sullivan, L H Sobin, C Wittekind. Wiley-Liss, New York 2001; 333–347
- Giulianotti P C, Boggi U, Fornaciari G, et al. Prognostic value of histological grading in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Klöppel vs TNM grading. Int J Pancreatol 1995; 17: 279–289
- Wittekind C, Henson D E, Hutter R VP, Sobin L H, et al. TNM Supplement. A Commentary on Uniform Use. 2nd ed. Wiley-Liss, New York 2001
- Hermanek P. Staging of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1991; 17: 167–172
- Böttger T, Zech W W, Sorger K, Junginger T. Relevant factors in the prognosis of ductal pancreatic carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 1990; 156: 781–788
- Tsunoda T, Ura K, Eto T, Matsumoto T, Tsuchiya R. UICC and Japanese Stage Classifications for carcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Pancreatol 1991; 8: 205–214
- Eskelinen M, Lipponen P. A review of prognostic factors in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Detect Prev 1992; 16: 287–295
- Bakkevold K E, Kambesta B. Staging of carcinoma of the pancreas and ampulla of Vater. Int J Pancreatol 1995; 17: 249–259
- Compton C C. Pancreatic (Exocrine) Reporting Protocol. College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL 2005, http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/cancer_protocols/2005/pancreasexo05_pw.pdf (accessed May 2008)
- Fortner J G, Klimstra D S, Senie T R, Maclean B J. Tumor size is the primary prognosticator for pancreatic cancer after regional pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 147–153
- Griffanti-Bartoli F, Arnone G B, Ceppa P, Ravera G, Carrabetta S, Civalleri D. Malignant tumors in the head of the pancreas and the periampullary region, diagnostic and prognostic aspects. Anticancer Res 1994; 14: 657–666
- Nagakawa T, Mori K, Nakano T, et al. Perineural invasion of carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tract. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 619–621
- Tannapfel A, Wittekind C, Hunefeld G. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Pancreatol 1992; 12: 145–152
- Verbeke C S. Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer–are we there yet?. Histopathology 2008; 52: 787–796
- Kim J, Reber H A, Dry S M, et al. Unfavourable prognosis associated with K-ras gene mutation in pancreatic cancer surgical margins. Gut 2006; 55: 1598–1605