Students Acquiring Expertise through Student-Centered Learning in Mathematics Lessons

References

• Alliance for Excellent Education. (2012). Culture shift: Teaching in a learner-centered environment powered by digital learning. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 6, 2013, from http://www.all4ed.org/files/CultureSift.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, W. S. (1973). Learning to discover rules by discovery. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 325–328. doi: 10.1037/h0034585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, P., Boshuizen, H., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 427–435. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417–451). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, D., & Ginnis, P. (1986). A guide to student centred learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., & Hawks, J. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(3), 247–285. doi: 10.1007/BF02309532
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2001). Mathematics education and language. Interpreting hermeneutics and post-structuralism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1961). The art of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. (1999). Carl rogers and postmodernism: Challenges in nursing and health sciences. Nursing and Health Sciences, 1(4), 241–247. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00031.x
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M. (1990). The nurnberg funnell: Designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill (pp. 7–10). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M. (2004). Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on-task. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 365–399. doi: 10.3102/00028312041002365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., Kessel, C., Moschkovich, J., & Munoz-Nunez, A. (2001). Learning to graph linear functions: A case study of conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 215–252. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derting, T. L., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: Positive relationships with long-term student achievement. Cell Biology Education, 9(4), 462–472.
   Google Scholar
• Eronen, L., & Haapasalo, L. (2006). Shifting from textbook tasks to mathematics making. In T. Asunta & J. Viiri (Eds.), Pathways into research-based teaching and learning in mathematics and science education (pp. 75–92). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 84.
   Google Scholar
• Eronen, L., & Haapasalo, L. (2011). Making mathematics through progressive technology. In B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Palsdottir, B. Dahl, & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook on nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 731–739). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Hannula, M. S., Zan, R., & Brown, L. C. (Eds.). (2006). Affect in mathematics education: Exploring theoretical frameworks. A PME special issue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 179–192. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9029-1
   Google Scholar
• Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 521–544. doi: 10.1007/BF00315943
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M., & Mahalingam, R. (1998). Personal cognitive development and its implications for teaching and learning. Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 35–44. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3301_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). Wwwophfi. Retrieved 22 June, 2016, from http://www.oph.fi/english/current_issues/101/0/what_is_going_on_in_finland_curriculum_reform_2016.
   Google Scholar
• Francisco, J. M., (2013). Learning in collaborative settings: Students building on each other’s ideas to promote their mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 417–438. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9437-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps – improving literacy and mathematics by ict-enhanced collaboration. Computers & Education, 99, 68–80. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1995). Assessing student centred courses. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Learning and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, E. P. (1988). Mathematics, metaphors, and human factors: Mathematical, technical, and pedagogical challenges in the educational use of graphical representations of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7(2), 135–173.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59–72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). A response to the commentaries. Comparative Social Research, 16, 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Haapasalo, L. (2003). The conflict between conceptual and procedural knowledge: Should we need to understand in order to be able to do, or vice versa? In L. Haapasalo & K. Sormunen (Eds.), Towards meaningful mathematics and science education. Proceedings of the 19th FAMSER symposium (pp. 1–20). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
   Google Scholar
• Haapasalo, L. (2007). Adapting mathematics education to the needs of ICT. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 1(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Haapasalo, L., & Samuels, P. (2011). Responding to the challenges of instrumental orchestration through physical and virtual robotics. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1484–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, R. M., & Crosby, J. (2000). AMEE guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 334–347. doi: 10.1080/014215900409410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., … Stigler, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study, NCES (2003-013), U.S. Department of education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Holliman, R., & Scanlon, E. (2006). Investigating cooperation and collaboration in near synchronous computer mediated conferences. Computers & Education, 46(3), 322–335. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, H., Logan, J., & McCrae, B. (2003). Teaching mathematics in Australia: Results from the TIMSS video study. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Sylvan, L. (2010). Admiration for virtue: Neuroscientific perspectives on a motivating emotion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(2), 110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., Hurme, T., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Self-regulation and motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. In S. Ludvigson, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructure and practices (pp. 330–345). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02296434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadijevich, D. J., & Haapasalo, L. (2001). Linking procedural and conceptual mathematical knowledge through CAL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(2), 156–165. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M. (2001). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Eds.), Studies of group process (pp. 33–57). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kontkanen, S., Dillon, P., Valtonen, T., Eronen, L., Koskela, H., & Väisänen, P. (2016). Students’ experiences of learning with iPads in upper secondary school – a base for proto-TPACK. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, J. J. (1999). Developing employment-related office technology skills (MDS-1199). Berkeley: National Center for Research in Vocational Education, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., & Cobb, P. (2003). Communication and language. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 237–248). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: Beyond “educational bulimia’?. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334. doi: 10.1080/03075070309293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113. doi: 10.1023/A:1014031004832
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2004). Should there Be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. (1998). Resources for refining mathematical conceptions: Case studies in learning about linear functions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(2), 209–237. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. (2004). Appropriating mathematical practices: A case study of learning to use and explore functions through interaction with a tutor. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1), 49–80. doi: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017691.13428.b9
   Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Aspects of understanding: On multiple perspectives and representations of linear relations, and connections among them&Rsqu.O; In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of function (pp. 69–100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, J. (2013). Developing a new framework for conceptualizing “student-centered learning”. The Educational Forum, 77(2), 161–175. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2012.761313
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 27–36). Dublin: AISHE.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915. doi: 10.1037/a0019545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi: 10.1080/00313830120074206
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Z., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129–143. doi: 10.3102/00346543065002129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitz, J., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y.-T. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers. Teaching, Learning and Computing – 1998 National Survey, report 4. Retrieved February 26, 2013, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/FINDINGS/REPORT4/REPORT4.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. C., McKenney, S., & Herrington, J. (2011). Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 55–65. doi: 10.14742/ajet.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O. Malley (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 80–84. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660020204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P., & Berry, J. (2003). Small group learning in mathematics: Teachers’ and pupils’ ideas about groupwork in school. Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia, 13. Turku: Painosalama Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1), 11–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb01086.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A., Smith, J., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: Themicrogenetic analysis of one student’s understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 55–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, J., & Yerushalmy, M. (1992). Getting students to function in and with algebra. In G. Harel, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (MAA Notes, Vol. 25) (pp. 261–289). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification – the case of function. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (MAA Notes, Vol 25) (pp. 261–289). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 13–57. doi: 10.1023/A:1014097416157
   Google Scholar
• Silfverberg, H., & Haapasalo, L. (2011). Painful paradigm shifts in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Palsdottir, B. Dahl, & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook on nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 731–739). Charlotte, NCC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Soucy McCrone, S. (2005). The development of mathematical discussions: An investigation in a fifth-grade classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 111–133. doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0702_2
   Google Scholar
• Speck, B. W. (2003). Fostering collaboration among students in problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003(1), 59–65. doi: 10.1002/tl.114
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D., Gray, E., Ali, M. B., Crowley, L., DeMarois, P., McGowan, M., … Yusof, Y. (2001). Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1, 81–104. doi: 10.1080/14926150109556452
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., & James, D. (2006). Reinventing grounded theory: Some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32(6), 767–795. doi: 10.1080/01411920600989412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 410–441. doi: 10.2307/747624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1348/000709908X380772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2015). The Global Information Technology Report 2015. Retrieved 24 October, 2016, from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67. doi: 10.1023/A:1007999204543
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Huang, Y. (2007). Ninth-grade student engagement in teacher-centered and student-centered technology-enhanced learning environments. Science Education, 91(5), 727–749. doi: 10.1002/sce.20216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2010). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: The Guilford Press. p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113–121. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar