Change in the perceived reproductive age window and delayed fertility in Europe

References

• Aassve, A., B. Arpino, and F. C. Billari. 2013. Age norms on leaving home: Multilevel evidence from the European Social Survey, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45: 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpino, B., G. Esping-Andersen, and L. Pessin. 2015. How do changes in gender role attitudes towards female employment influence fertility? A macro-level analysis, European Sociological Review 31: 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaujouan, É. 2020. Latest-late fertility? Decline and resurgence of late parenthood across the low fertility countries, Population and Development Review 46: 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaujouan, É., Z. Brzozowska, and K. Zeman. 2016. The limited effect of increasing educational attainment on childlessness trends in twentieth-century Europe, women born 1916–65, Population Studies 70: 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2016.1206210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaujouan, É. and T. Sobotka. 2017. Late motherhood in low-fertility countries: Reproductive intentions, trends and consequences, in D. Stoop (ed.), Preventing Age Related Fertility Loss. Cham: Springer, pp. 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14857-1_2
   Google Scholar
• Berrington, A., Y. Hu, P. W. F. Smith, and P. Sturgis. 2008. A graphical chain model for reciprocal relationships between women’s gender role attitudes and labour force participation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 171: 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C., A. Goisis, A. C. Liefbroer, R. A. Settersten Jr., A. Aassve, G. O. Hagestad, and Z. Spéder. 2011. Social age deadlines for the childbearing of women and men, Human Reproduction 26: 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C., L. Badolato, G. O. Hagestad, A. C. Liefbroer, R. A. Settersten Jr, Z. Spéder, and J. Van Bavel. 2021. The timing of life. Topline results from Round 9 of the European Social Survey. ESS Topline Results Series 11.
   Google Scholar
• Blinder, A. S. 1973. Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates, The Journal of Human Resources 8: 436–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/144855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, H.-P. and J. Huinink. 1991. Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation, American Journal of Sociology 97: 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/229743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casterline, J. B. 2001. Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Introduction, in J. B. Casterline (ed.), Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (US), pp. 1–38. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223862/ (accessed: 12 November 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S. K. Y., E. Lazzari, C. Venetis, and G. M. Chambers. 2023. Childbirth timing and completed family size by the mode of conception—The role of medically assisted reproduction: A population-based cohort study in Australia, The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific 33: 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100686
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cislaghi, B. and L. Heise. 2018. Theory and practice of social norms interventions: Eight common pitfalls, Globalization and Health 14(83). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0398-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diaz, C. J. and J. E. Fiel. 2016. The effect(s) of teen pregnancy: Reconciling theory, methods, and findings, Demography 53: 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0446-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2023. Eurostat Database. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed: 15 June 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Feichtinger, G., A. Prskawetz, A. Seidl, C. Simon, and S. Wrzaczek. 2003. Do Egalitarian Societies Boost Fertility? Working Paper 2. Vienna Institute of Demography, p. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Frejka, T. and J.-P. Sardon. 2006. First birth trends in developed countries: Persisting parenthood postponement, Demographic Research 15: 147–180. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, A. H., C. Bryson, L. Fadel, T. Haux, J. Koops, and M. Mynarska. 2021. Exploring the concept of intensive parenting in a three-country study, Demographic Research 44: 333–348. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., E. Bernhardt, and T. Lappegård. 2015. The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior, Population and Development Review 41: 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. and S. Milner. 2011. What is ‘new’ about fatherhood? The social construction of fatherhood in France and the UK, Men and Masculinities 14(5): 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X11412940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habbema, J. Dik F., M. J. C. Eijkemans, H. Leridon, and E. R. te Velde. 2015. Realizing a desired family size: When should couples start?, Human Reproduction 30: 2215–2221. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayford, S. R. 2013. Marriage (still) matters: The contribution of demographic change to trends in childlessness in the United States, Demography 50: 1641–1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0215-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoem, J. M., D. Kostova, A. Jasilioniene, and C. Mureşan. 2009. Traces of the second demographic transition in four selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Union formation as a demographic manifestation, European Journal of Population 25: 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9177-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook, J. L. and E. Paek. 2020. A stalled revolution? Change in women's labor force participation during child-rearing years, Europe and the United States 1996–2016, Population and Development Review 46(4): 677–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, R. and E. Mcanany. 2001. Mass media and fertility change, in J. B. Casterline (ed.), Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US) (National Research Council (US) Committee on Population). p. 32. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223858/
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertility Database. 2023. Human Fertility Database. Available: https://www.humanfertility.org (accessed: 15 June 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. 2006. Mapping global values, Comparative Sociology 5: 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667401
   Google Scholar
• Jann, B. 2008. The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal 8(4): 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasso, G. and K. D. Opp. 1997. Probing the character of norms: A factorial survey analysis of the norms of political action, American Sociological Review 62: 947–964. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, L. C., T. Lavender, R. McNamee, S. M. O’Neill, T. Mills, and A. S. Khashan. 2013. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: Evidence from a large contemporary cohort, PLoS ONE 8: e56583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, H.-P., F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega. 2002. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s, Population and Development Review 28(4): 641–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. J. and M. J. Cho. 2021. The association between assisted reproduction technology (ART) and social perception of childbearing deadline ages: A cross-country examination of selected EU countries, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A. and M. Blohm. 2009. Item nonresponse in the European Social Survey, Research & Methods 18: 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, R. and V. Mitev. 2013. Correspondence between legislation and public opinion in Bulgaria about access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Slovenian Journal of Public Health 52(4): 285–291. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2013-0029
   Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, M., R. Scholz, F. Peters, and I. Wlosnewski. 2011. Order-specific fertility rates for Germany: Estimates from perinatal statistics for the period 2001-2008, Comparative Population Studies 35(2): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2010-06
   Google Scholar
• Langdridge, D., P. Sheeran, and K. J. Connolly. 2005. Understanding the reasons for parenthood, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 23: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830500129438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rochebrochard, É., K. McElreavey, and P. Thonneau. 2003. Paternal age over 40 years: The “amber light” in the reproductive life of men?, Journal of Andrology 24: 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02694.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazzari, E., R. Mogi, and V. Canudas-Romo. 2021. Educational composition and parity contribution to completed cohort fertility change in low-fertility settings, Population Studies 75: 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.1895291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leridon, H. and D. Shapiro. 2017. Biological effects of first birth postponement and assisted reproductive technology on completed fertility, Population 72: 445–472. https://doi.org/10.3917/pope.l703.0445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesnard, L., A.-S. Cousteaux, F. Chanvril, and V. Le Hay. 2016. Do transitions to adulthood converge in Europe? An optimal matching analysis of work–family trajectories of men and women from 20 European countries, European Sociological Review 32: 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R. 2010. The unfolding story of the Second Demographic Transition, Population and Development Review 36: 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefbroer, A. C. and E.-M. Merz. 2009. Report on analysis of ESS data on cross-national differences in perceived norms concerning fertility-related behaviour. European Commission project ‘Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective’ (REPRO) Grant Agreement: SSH-CT-2008-217173. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of Sciences, p. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Liefbroer, A. C. and F. C. Billari. 2010. Bringing norms back in: A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour, Population, Space and Place 16: 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, M. M. 1984. Age and sequencing norms in the transition to adulthood, Social Forces 63(1): 229–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M. R. and J. B. Casterline. 1996. Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility, Population and Development Review 22: 151–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/2808010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mynarska, M. 2010. Deadline for parenthood: Fertility postponement and age norms in Poland, European Journal of Population 26: 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9194-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugarten, B. L. and G. O. Hagestad. 1976. Age and the life course, in E. Binstock and E. Shanas (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Oaxaca, R. 1973. Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets, International Economic Review 14: 693–709. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. 2023. Live births dataset. Available: https://www.ons.gov.uk/ (accessed: 15 June 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Pailhé, A., A. Solaz, and M. Stanfors. 2021. The great convergence: Gender and unpaid work in Europe and the United States, Population and Development Review 47: 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paksi, V. and I. Szalma. 2009. Age norms of childbearing. Early, ideal and late childbearing in European countries, Review of Sociology 2: 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Palloni, A. 2001. Diffusion in sociological analysis, in J. B. Casterline (ed.), Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (US), pp. 66–114.
   Google Scholar
• Pampel, F. 2011. Cohort changes in the socio-demographic determinants of gender egalitarianism, Social Forces 89: 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2011.0011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. S. 2000. Relationships among attitudes and subjective norms: Testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures, Communication Studies 51(2): 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970009388516
   Google Scholar
• Pedro, J., T. Brandão, L. Schmidt, M. E. Costa, and M. V. Martins. 2018. What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors, Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 123: 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2018.1480186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, B. and L. Bernardi. 2015. Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture. Introduction to special collection: “Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia”, Demographic Research 33: 701–732. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipov, D. and C. Berghammer. 2007. Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: A comparative study of European countries, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 271–305. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2007s271
   Google Scholar
• Präg, P., and M. C. Mills. 2017. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe. Usage and regulation in the context of cross-border reproductive care, in M. Kreyenfeld and D. Konietzka (eds.), Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 289–309.
   Google Scholar
• Prioux, F. 2005. Late fertility in Europe: Some comparative and historical data, Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 53: 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0398-7620(05)84763-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorius, G. A. and E. Nieschlag. 2010. Paternal age and reproduction, Human Reproduction Update 16: 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settersten, R. A. Jr. and G. O. Hagestad. 1996a. What’s the latest? Cultural age deadlines for family transitions, The Gerontologist 36: 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/36.2.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settersten, R. A. Jr. and G. O. Hagestad. 1996b. What's the latest? II. Cultural age deadlines for educational and work transitions, The Gerontologist 36: 602-613. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/36.5.602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settersten, R. A. Jr. and K. U. Mayer. 1997. The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course, Annual Review of Sociology 23: 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalma, I. and M. Djundeva. 2020. What shapes public attitudes towards assisted reproduction technologies in Europe?, Demográfia English Edition 62: 45–75. https://doi.org/10.21543/DEE.2019.2
   Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. and N. Nitsche. 2013. ‘The proper age for parenthood’ and second birth rates in Europe, European Sociological Review 29: 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kaa, D. J. 1987. Europe’s Second Demographic Transition, Population Bulletin 42: 1–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergauwen, J. 2016. Socio-economic conditions and changing partnership and family formation across European countries. Thèse de doctorat en sociologie [Doctoral thesis in sociology]. University of Antwerp. Available: http://rgdoi.net/10.1314/0RG.2.2.20633.52320 (accessed: 25 June 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Vinicius, L., R. Mace, and A. Migliano. 2014. Variation in male reproductive longevity across traditional societies, PLoS ONE 9: e112236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. and L. J. Kirmayer. 2008. Perceived stigmatisation of young mothers: An exploratory study of psychological and social experience, Social Science & Medicine 66: 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, E. 2008. Teenage mothers’ experiences of stigma, Journal of Youth Studies 11: 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260802392940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W. 2015. Placing families in context: Challenges for cross-national family research, Journal of Marriage and Family 77(1): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar