Microfoundations of the weakening educational gradient in fertility

References

• Ahn, Namkee and Pedro Mira. 2002. A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries, Journal of Population Economics 15(4): 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont, Mark A. 2010. Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and ecology, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41(1): 379–406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144621
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, Mark A. 2019. Approximate Bayesian computation, Annual Review of Statistics and its Application 6(1): 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105212
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. 1960. An economic analysis of fertility, in G. B. Roberts (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Columbia: Columbia University Press, pp. 209–240. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2387
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. and H. Gregg Lewis. 1973. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 81(2, Part 2): S279–S288. https://doi.org/10.1086/260166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. and Nigel Tomes. 1976. Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 84(4, Part 2): S143–S162. https://doi.org/10.1086/260536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, Ann and Serena Pattaro. 2014. Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: A life course perspective, Advances in Life Course Research 21: 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2013.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, Ann, Juliet Stone, and Éva Beaujouan. 2015. Educational differences in timing and quantum of childbearing in Britain: A study of cohorts born 1940–1969, Demographic Research 33(26): 733–764. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John. 1990. The measurement of wanted fertility, Population and Development Review 16(3): 487–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John. 1997. Trends in unwanted childbearing in the developing world, Studies in Family Planning 28(4): 267–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John. 2001. Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies, Population and Development Review 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition): 260–281. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3115260
   Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John. 2003. Completing the fertility transition in the developing world: The role of educational differences and fertility preferences, Population Studies 57(3): 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472032000137835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John and Robert E. Potter. 1983. Fertility, Biology, and Behavior: An Analysis of the Proximate Determinants. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, Heather D., Rachel Benson Gold, Cory L. Richards, and Lawrence B. Finer. 2006. Abortion in Women’s Lives. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Caltabiano, Marcantonio, Maria Castiglioni, and Alessandro Rosina. 2009. Lowest-low fertility: Signs of a recovery in Italy, Demographic Research 21(23): 681–718. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.23
   Google Scholar
• Castiglioni, Maria, Gianpiero Dalla Zuanna, and Marzia Loghi. 2001. Planned and unplanned births and conceptions in Italy, 1970–1995, European Journal of Population 17(3): 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011810602552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciganda, Daniel and Nicolas Todd. 2022. Demographic models of the reproductive process: Past, interlude, and future, Population Studies 76(3): 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.1959943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coale, Ansley J. and T. James Trussell. 1974. Model fertility schedules: Variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations, Population Index 40(2): 185–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/2733910
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cochrane, Susan Hill. 1979. Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know? Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dancik, Garrett M. and Karin S. Dorman. 2008. Mlegp: Statistical analysis for computer models of biological systems using R, Bioinformatics 24(17): 1966–1967. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wachter, David and Karel Neels. 2012. Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: Family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 227–258. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2011s227
   Google Scholar
• Doepke, Matthias. 2015. Gary Becker on the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Demographic Economics 81(1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2014.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterlin, Richard A. and Eileen M. Crimmins. 1985. The Fertility Revolution: A Supply-Demand Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta and Francesco C. Billari. 2015. Re-theorizing family demographics, Population and Development Review 41(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, Lawrence B. and Stanley K. Henshaw. 2006. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(2): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1363/3809006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galor, O. 2012. The demographic transition: Causes and consequences. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6334. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2003667
   Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, Frances, Eva Bernhardt, and Trude Lappegård. 2015. The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior, Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovina, Kateryna, Natalie Nitsche, Venla Berg, Anneli Miettinen, Anna Rotkirch, and Markus Jokela. 2023. Birth cohort changes in fertility ideals: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Finland, European Sociological Review 2023: jcad048. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad048
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Michael U. and Jukka Corander. 2016. Bayesian optimization for likelihood-free inference of simulator-based statistical models, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 17(1): 4256–4302. http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-017.html
   Google Scholar
• Hartnett, Caroline Sten and Alison Gemmill. 2020. Recent trends in U.S. childbearing intentions, Demography 57(6): 2035–2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00929-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, James J. and Robert J. Willis. 1976. Estimation of a stochastic model of reproduction: An econometric approach, in N. E. Terleckyj (ed.), Household Production and Consumption. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 99–146. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3961
   Google Scholar
• Henshaw, Stanley K. 1998. Unintended pregnancy in the United States, Family Planning Perspectives 30(1): 24–29+46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991522
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HMD. 2015. Human Mortality Database. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany), University of California, Berkeley (USA), and French Institute for Demographic Studies (France). Available: www.mortality.org (data downloaded on May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Hoem, Britta and Jan M. Hoem. 1989. The impact of women’s employment on second and third births in modern Sweden, Population Studies 43(1): 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000143846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertility Database. 2011. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria). Available at www.humanfertility.org
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Larry E., Alice Schoonbroodt, and Michèle Tertilt. 2010. Fertility theories: Can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?, in J. B. Shoven (ed.), Demography and the Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 43–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Øystein. 1992. The emergence of a positive relation between education and third birth rates in Norway with supportive evidence from the United States, Population Studies 46(3): 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000146456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Øystein. 2001. The high fertility of college educated women in Norway: An artefact of the separate modelling of each parity transition, Demographic Research 5(6): 187–216. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2001.5.6
   Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Øystein and Ronald R. Rindfuss. 2008. Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964, American Sociological Review 73(5): 854–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, Michaela. 2002. Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection?: An investigation into the positive effect of women’s education on second birth risks in West Germany, Demographic Research 7(2): 15–48. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.2
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, Sumati and Minja Kim Choe. 1998. Wanted and Unwanted Fertility in Selected States of India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, Number 6. Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Leridon, Henry. 2004. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Human reproduction 19(7): 1548–1553. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh304
   Google Scholar
• Luci-Greulich, Angela and Olivier Thévenon. 2014. Does economic advancement ‘cause’ a re-increase in fertility? An empirical analysis for OECD countries (1960–2007), European Journal of Population 30(2): 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9309-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, Eva-Maria and Aart C. Liefbroer. 2017. Cross-national differences in the association between educational attainment and completed fertility. Do welfare regimes matter?, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 15: 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s095
   Google Scholar
• Mode, Charles J. 1985. Stochastic Processes in Demography and Their Computer Implementation. Biomathematics Volume 14. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Michael. 1993. The contraceptive pill and women’s employment as factors in fertility change in Britain 1963–1980: A challenge to the conventional view, Population Studies 47(2): 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000146986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musick, Kelly, Paula England, Sarah Edgington, and Nicole Kangas. 2009. Education differences in intended and unintended fertility, Social Forces 88(2): 543–572. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrskylä, Mikko, Hans-Peter Kohler, and Francesco C. Billari. 2009. Advances in development reverse fertility declines, Nature 460(7256): 741–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available: https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Régnier-Loilier, Arnaud, Henri Leridon, and Fabrice Cahen. 2007. Four decades of legalized contraception in France: An unfinished revolution?, Population & Sociétés 439(10): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3917/popsoc.439.0001
   Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, Ronald R. and Karin L. Brewster. 1996. Childrearing and fertility, Population and Development Review 22: 258–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/2808014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš and Éva Beaujouan. 2014. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe, Population and Development Review 40(3): 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš, Éva Beaujouan, and Jan Van Bavel. 2017. Introduction: Education and fertility in low-fertility settings, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 15: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s001
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2011. Family and Occupation Survey, 1988, female sample (Dataset). Norwegian Social Science Data Services. https://doi.org/10.18712/NSD-NSD0195-1-V1
   Google Scholar
• Testa, Maria Rita. 2014. On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: Individual- and country-level evidence, Advances in Life Course Research 21: 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Tax Administration. 2023. National Insurance Scheme Basic Amount. Available: https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/rates/national-insurance-scheme-basic-amount/ (accessed: 20 December 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Willekens, Frans. 2017. Continuous-Time Microsimulation in Longitudinal Analysis. In New Frontiers in Microsimulation Modelling, pp. 413–436. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, Deirdre. 1982. Low fertility in Europe: A report from the 1981 IUSSP meeting, Family Planning Perspectives 14(5): 264–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2134883
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeman, Kryštof, Zuzanna Brzozowska, Tomáš Sobotka, Éva Beaujouan, and Anna Matysiak. 2014. Cohort Fertility and Education Database. Methods Protocol. Available: https://www.eurrep.org/wp-content/uploads/EURREP_Database_Methods_Protocol_Dec2014.pdf (accessed: 20 December 2023).
   Google Scholar