Fair Elections, Representation, and the win-loss Satisfaction with Democracy gap

References

• Aarts, K., & Thomassen, J. (2008). Satisfaction with democracy: Do institutions matter? Electoral Studies, 27(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, J., Bussing, G. A., Krishnamurthy, A., Madan, N., Mehling, K., Renberg, K., … Ridge, H. (2020). Does a partisan public increase democratic stability? In H. Oscarsson & S. Holmberg (Eds.), Research handbook for political partisanship (pp. 256–265). Oscarsson & Holmberg.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. J. (2017). Exit to the right? Comparing far right voters and abstainers in Western Europe. Electoral Studies, 50, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J. (2002). Good questions, dubious inferences, and bad solutions: Some further thoughts on satisfaction with democracy (Binghamton University, Center on Democratic Performance Working Paper No. 116, Binghamton, NY).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (Eds.). (2005). Losers’ consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, J., & Vatter, A. (2012). Can't get no satisfaction with the Westminster model? Winners, losers and the effects of consensual and direct democratic institutions on satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 51(4), 435–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., & Gélineau, F. (2007). Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., & Loewen, P. (2007). Electoral systems and evaluations of democracy. Democratic Reform in New Brunswick 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A., Morin-Chassé, A., & Singh, S. P. (2017). Election outcomes, legislative representation, and satisfaction with democracy. Party Politics, 23(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815583200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borooah, V. K., Katos, A. B., & Katsouli, E. (2013). Inter-country differences in voter satisfaction with the democratic process: A study of world elections. Public Choice, 157(3), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0134-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruter, M., & Harrison, S. (2017). Understanding the emotional act of voting. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E., Chu, Y. H., & Wu, W. C. (2014). Consenting to lose or expecting to win? Inter-temporal changes in voters’ winner-loser status and satisfaction with democracy. Elections and Democracy: Representation and Accountability, 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716334.003.0012
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, P., & Torcal, M. (2018). The effects of government system fractionalization on satisfaction with democracy. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(3), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. (2020). Does public support help democracy survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., Martinez, M. D., Gainous, J., & Kane, J. G. (2006). Winners, losers, and election context: Voter responses to the 2000 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 59(4), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curini, L., Jou, W., & Memoli, V. (2012). Satisfaction with democracy and the winner/loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, S., & Linde, J. (2016). Losing happily? The mitigating effect of democracy and quality of government on the winner–loser gap in political support. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(9), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1177831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoust, J.-F., & Blais, A. (2021). Electoral behaviour in multilevel systems. In I. Lago (Eds.), Handbook on decentralization, devolution and the state (pp. 255–268). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daoust, J.-F., Ridge, H. M., & Mongrain, P. (2023). Electoral outcomes and satisfaction with democracy: A comparison of regional and national elections. Electoral Studies, 84, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P. 2011. Electoral losers revisited-How citizens react to defeat at the ballot box. Electoral Studies 30(1), 102–113.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L., & Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1152–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2006). Voter satisfaction and electoral systems: Does preferential voting in candidate-centred systems make a difference? European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 723–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W., Klemmensen, R., & Serritzlew, S. (2019). Losers lose more than winners win: Asymmetrical effects of winning and losing in elections. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, R. (2011). Freedom to choose and democracy: The empirical question. Economics and Philosophy, 27(3), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267111000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, J. (2012). Why feed the hand that bites you? Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post-communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 410–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, J., & Peters, Y. (2020). Responsiveness, support, and responsibility: How democratic responsiveness facilitates responsible government. Party Politics, 26(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818763986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveless, M. (2021). When you win, nothing hurts: The durability of electoral salience on individuals’ satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 69(3), 538–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, P. C. (2016). Economic evaluations, procedural fairness, and satisfaction with democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 69(3), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916652238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makowski, D., Wiernik, B. M., Patil, I., Lüdecke, D., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2022). correlation: Methods for correlation analysis [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=correlation.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Jones, E., & Loveless, M. (2023). Early election calling and satisfaction with democracy. Government and Opposition, 58(3), 598–622. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., Daoust, J.-F., & Dassonneville, R. (2023). Winning, losing, and the quality of democracy. Political Studies, 71(2), 483–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridge, H. M. (2022a). Electoral outcomes and support for Westminster democracy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 32(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1946546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridge, H. M. (2022b). Enemy mine: Negative partisanship and satisfaction with democracy. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1271–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09658-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridge, H. M. (2022c). Just like the others: Party differences, perception, and satisfaction with democracy. Party Politics, 28(3), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820985193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridge, H. M. (2023a). Defining democracy: Democratic commitment in the Arab World. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, H. M. (2023b). Perceived party differences, election outcomes, and satisfaction with democracy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2023.2189259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H., & Romanova, V. (2018). Towards a scholarship on regional elections. Regional & Federal Studies, 28(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1473857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is … and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0033
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Karakoç, E., & Blais, A. (2012). Differentiating winners: How elections affect satisfaction with democracy. Electoral Studies, 31(1), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. P. (2014). Not all election winners are equal: Satisfaction with democracy and the nature of the vote. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. P., & Thornton, J. R. (2016). Strange bedfellows: Coalition makeup and perceptions of democratic performance among electoral winners. Electoral Studies, 42, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasavage, D. (2020). The decline and rise of democracy: A global history from antiquity to today. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, L., Blais, A., Bol, D., & Kostelka, F. (2017). Making electoral democracy work [Aggregate Dataset]. https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/MEDW
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D., & Mazepus, H. (2022). Does the election winner–loser gap extend to subjective health and well-being? Political Studies Review, 14789299221124735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDusky-Allen, J., & Utych, S. M. (2021). The effect of partisan representation at different levels of government on satisfaction with democracy in the United States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 21(4), 403–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2021.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. F., Schneider, F., & Halla, M. (2009). The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe — a panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 30–41. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar