206
Views
74
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

MRI of the small bowel with oral contrast or nasojejunal intubation in Crohn's disease: Randomized comparison of patient acceptance

, , , , , & show all
Pages 44-51 | Received 24 Apr 2007, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, Rex D, Chernish SM. Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why?. Radiology 1987; 163: 297–305
  • Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Lanciotti S, Bertini L, Gualdi G. Assessment of Crohn's disease in the small bowel: prospective comparison of magnetic resonance enteroclysis with conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2817–27
  • Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P. MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2651–8
  • Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000; 215: 717–25
  • Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, Prassopoulos P, Roussomoustakaki M. Assessment of Crohn's disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1017–24
  • Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of small intestinal Crohn's disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 20: 137–56
  • Wiarda BM, Kuipers EJ, Heitbrink MA, Oijen AV, Stoker J. MR enteroclysis of inflammatory small-bowel diseases. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 522–31
  • Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, Herborn CU, Ruhm SG, Debatin JF. Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 2003; 228: 279–83
  • Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, Scholmerich J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, et al. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 491–7
  • Bernstein CN, Greenberg H, Boult I, Chubey S, Leblanc C, Ryner L. A prospective comparison study of MRI versus small bowel follow-through in recurrent Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2493–502
  • Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P, Dito L, Buena DM, Falconieri P, et al. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn's disease. Gut 2003; 52: 393–7
  • Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, Ritz MA, Zollikofer CL, Wentz K. Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 2001; 358: 987–8
  • Pilleul F, Godefroy C, Yzebe-Beziat D, Dugougeat-Pilleul F, Lachaux A, Valette PJ. Magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2005; 29: 803–8
  • Schunk K. Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 13: 409–25
  • Ajaj W, Goyen M, Schneemann H, Kuehle C, Nuefer M, Ruehm SG, et al. Oral contrast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distension. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1400–6
  • Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Hellund JC, Geitung JT, Storaas T, Gjesdal KI, et al. MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 666–71
  • Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC. Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 458–64
  • Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Storaas T, Pierre-Jerome C, Klow NE. Osmolarity: a decisive parameter of bowel agents in intestinal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1331–6
  • Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, Berstad AE, Borthne A, Try K, , et al A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2007; Epub ahead of print.
  • Stange EF, Travis SP, Vermeire S, Beglinger C, Kupcinkas L, Geboes K, et al. European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: definitions and diagnosis. Gut 2006; 55 Suppl 1: i1–15
  • Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Rugtveit J, Perminow G, Reiseter T, Klow NE. Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 207–14
  • Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005; 26: 237–46
  • Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, Duvoisin B, Meuli R, Michetti P, et al. Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of “sign-by-sign” correlation. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1303–11
  • Umschaden HW, Gasser J. MR enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 231–48
  • Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johansson J, Oberg S. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 239–45
  • Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, Amin Z, Zeegen R, Westaby D, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 1325–32
  • Sempere GA, Martinez SV, Medina CE, Benages A, Tome TA, Canelles P, et al. MRI evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1829–35
  • Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC. Dose optimization of mannitol solution for small bowel distension in MRI. J Magn Res Imaging 2004; 20: 648–53
  • Rajesh A, Maglinte DD. Multislice CT enteroclysis: technique and clinical applications. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 31–9
  • Weissfeld JL, Ling BS, Schoen RE, Bresalier RS, Riley T, Prorok PC. Adherence to repeat screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. Cancer 2002; 94: 2569–76
  • Duc SR, Hodler J, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Mengiardi B, Dora C, et al. Prospective evaluation of two different injection techniques for MR arthrography of the hip. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 473–8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.