They are not destined to fail: a systematic examination of scores on embedded performance validity indicators in patients with intellectual disability

References

• Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(2):419–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhasin TK, Brocksen S, Avchen RN, Braun KVN. Prevalence of four developmental disabilities among children aged 8 years: metropolitan Atlanta developmental disabilities surveillance program, 1996 and 2000. Morbidity Mortality Week Rep. 2006;55(SS01):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyle CA, Lary JM. Prevalence of selected developmental disabilities in children 3-10 years of age: the Metropolitan Atlanta developmental disabilities surveillance program, 1991. Morbidity Mortality Week Rep. 1996;45(SS02):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camp BW, Broman SH, Nichols PL, Leff M. Maternal and neonatal risk factors for mental retardation: defining the “at-risk” child. Early Hum Dev. 1998;50(2):159–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington (DC): Author; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood MW, Kirk JW. The base rate of suboptimal effort in a pediatric mild TBI sample: performance on the medical symptom validity test. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24(5):860–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood MW, Kirk JW, Blaha RZ, Wilson P. Noncredible effort during pediatric neuropsychological exam: a case series and literature review. Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16(6):604–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare CA, Messa I, Zuccato BG, Merker B, Erdodi LA. Prevalence of invalid performance on baseline testing for sport-related concussion by age and validity indicator. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(6):697–703. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaskewitz N, Merten T, Kathmann N. Performance of children on symptom validity tests: TOMM, MSVT, and FIT. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23(4):379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou M, McCaffrey RJ. Using the TOMM for evaluating children’s effort to perform optimally on neuropsychological measures. Child Neuropsychol. 2003;9(2):81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb MJ. Pediatric performance validity testing: state of the field and current research. J Pedia Neuropsychol. 2018;4:83–85. doi:10.1007/s40817-018-00062-y.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein JD, Erdodi LA, Linnea KS. Introducing a forced-choice recognition task to the California verbal learning test – children’s version. Child Neuropsychol. 2017;23(3):284–299. doi:10.1080/09297049.2015.1135422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald B, Ponds RW, Merten T. Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: a survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(8):771–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Smith HH, Lehman RAW, Vogt AT. Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978;46(5):892–900. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bigler ED. Neuroimaging as a biomarker in symptom validity and performance validity testing. Brain Imaging Behav. 2015;9(3):421–444. doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9409-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush SS, Heilbronner RL, Ruff RM. Psychological assessment of symptom and performance validity, response bias, and malingering: official position of the association for scientific advancement in psychological injury and law. Psychol Inj Law. 2014;7(3):197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Bush SS, Ruff RM, Troster AI, Barth JT, Koffler SP, Pliskin NH, … Silver CH. Symptom validity assessment: practice issues and medical necessity (NAN Policy and Planning Committees). Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz MD, Williams MA, Ben-Porath YS, Bianchini KJ, Boone KB, Kirkwood MW, Larrabee GJ, Ord JS. Official position of the American academy of clinical neuropsychology social security administration policy on validity testing: guidance and recommendations for change. Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(6):723–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Morgan JE, Larrabee GJ, Millis SR, Participants C. American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:1093–1129. doi:10.1080/13854040903155063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone KB. The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examination. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(4):729–741. doi:10.1080/13854040802427803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz M. Reducing the probability of false positives in malingering detection of social security disability claimants. Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;25(7):1239–1252. doi:10.1080/13854046.2011.586785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Assessment of malingering. In: Larrabee GJ, editor. Forensic neuropsychology: a scientific approach. Second ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 116–159.
   Google Scholar
• Millis SR. What clinicians really need to know about symptom exaggeration, insufficient effort, and malingering: statistical and measurement matters. In: Morgan JE, Sweet JJ, editors. American academy of clinical neuropsychology/psychology press continuing education series. Neuropsychology of malingering casebook. Psychology Press; 2009. p. 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte C, Axelrod BN, Montoya E. Making sure neuropsychological data are meaningful: use of performance validity testing in medicolegal and clinical contexts. Psychol Inj Law. 2015;8(2):100–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: relationship to likelihood ratios. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;22:410–425. doi:10.1080/13854040701494987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miele AS, Gunner JH, Lynch JK, McCaffrey RJ. Are embedded validity indices equivalent to free-standing symptom validity tests? Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27(1):10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone KB. Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology. New York (NY): Guilford; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Lichtenstein JD. Invalid before impaired: an emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators. Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;31(6–7):1029–1046. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1323119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz MD. Symptom validity issues in the psychological consultative examination for social security disability. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24(6):1045–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz MD, Abrahams JP, Kohlmaier J. Malingering on the Social Security disability consultative exam: a new rating scale. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz MD, Prentkowski E, Rao A. To work or not to work: motivation (not low IQ) determines symptom validity test findings. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;26(4):306–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Chafetz MD, Biondolillo A. Validity issues in Atkins death cases. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(8):1358–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker A, Musso MW, Jones GN, Roid G, Gouvier D. Unreliable block span reveals simulated intellectual disability on the stanford-binet intelligence scales. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2014;21(1):51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salekin KL, Doane BM. Malingering intellectual disability: the value of available measures and methods. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009;16(2):105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17(3):410–425. doi:10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graue LO, Berry DT, Clark JA, Sollman MJ, Cardi M, Hopkins J, Werline D. Identification of feigned mental retardation using the new generation of malingering detection instruments: preliminary findings. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;21(6):929–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley KE, Deal WP. Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: potential problems and issues. Ment Retard. 2006;44(2):112–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Love CM, Glassmire DM, Zanolini SJ, Wolf A. Specificity and false positive rates of the test of memory malingering, rey 15-item test, and rey word recognition test among forensic inpatients with intellectual disabilities. Assessment. 2014;21(5):618–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall P, Happe M. The performance of individuals with mental retardation on cognitive tests assessing effort and motivation. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;21(5):826–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith K, Boone K, Victor T, Miora D, Cottingham M, Ziegler E, Zeller M, Wright M. Comparison of credible patients of very low intelligence and non-credible patients on neurocognitive performance validity indicators. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(6):1048–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor TL, Boone KB. Identification of feigned mental retardation. In: Boone KB, editor Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: a neuropsychological perspective. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2007. p. 310–345.
   Google Scholar
• Arentsen TJ, Boone KB, Lo TT, Goldberg HE, Cottingham ME, Victor TL, … Zeller MA. Effectiveness of the Comalli Stroop Test as a measure of negative response bias. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(6):1060–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell-Sprinkel TL, Boone KB, Miora D, Cottingham M, Victor T, Ziegler E, Zeller M, Wright M. Re-examination of the rey word recognition test. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(3):516–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone KB, Salazar X, Lu P, Warner-Chacon K, Razani J. The Rey 15-item recognition trial: a technique to enhance sensitivity of the Rey 15-item memorization test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24(5):561–573. doi:10.1076/jcen.24.5.561.1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein JD, Erdodi LA, Rai JK, Mazur-Mosiewicz A, Flaro L. Wisconsin card sorting test embedded validity indicators developed for adults can be extended to children. Child Neuropsychol. 2018;24(2):247–260. doi:10.1080/09297049.2016.1259402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein JD, Greenacre MK, Cutler L, Abeare K, Baker SD, Kent K, Ali J, Erdodi LA. Geographic variation and instrumentation artifacts: in search of confounds in performance validity assessment in adults with mild TBI. Psychol Inj Law. 2019;12(2):127–145. doi:10.1007/s12207-019-0935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall P, Schroeder R, O’Brien J, Fischer R, Ries A, Blesi B, Barker J. Effectiveness of symptom validity measures in identifying cognitive and behavioral symptom exaggeration in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:1204–1237. doi:10.1080/13854046.2010.514290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse CL, Douglas-Newman K, Mandel S, Swirsky-Sacchetti T. Utility of the Rey-15 recognition trial to detect invalid performance in a forensic neuropsychological sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;1–13. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.832385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitch S, Boone KB, Wen J, Arnold G, Alfano K. The utility of the Rey word recognition test in the detection of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;20(4):873–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poynter K, Boone KB, Ermshar A, Miora D, Cottingham M, Victor TL, Ziegler E, Zeller MA, Wright M. Wait, there’s a baby in this bath water! Update on quantitative and qualitative cut-offs for Rey 15-item recall and recognition. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;34(8):1367–1380. doi:10.1093/arclin/acy087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Abeare CA, Lichtenstein JD, Tyson BT, Kucharski B, Zuccato BG, Roth RM. WAIS-IV processing speed scores as measures of non-credible responding – the third generation of embedded performance validity indicators. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(2):148–157. doi:10.1037/pas0000319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassmire DM, Wood ME, Ta MT, Kinney DI, Nitch SR. Examining false-positive rates of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) processing speed based embedded validity indicators among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Psychol Assess. 2019;31(1):120–125. doi:10.1037/pas0000650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare C, Messa I, Whitfield C, Zuccato B, Casey J, Rykulski N, Erdodi L. Performance validity in collegiate football athletes at baseline neurocognitive testing. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019;34(4):E20–E31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz MD, Biondolillo AM. Feigning a severe impairment profile. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(3):205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Pelletier CL, Roth RM. Elevations on select Conners’ CPT-II scales indicate noncredible responding in adults with traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018;25(1):19–28. doi:10.1080/23279095.2016.1232262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Tyson BT, Shahein A, Lichtenstein JD, Abeare CA, Pelletier CL, Zuccato BG, Kucharski B, Roth RM. The power of timing: adding a time-to-completion cutoff to the word choice test and recognition memory test improves classification accuracy. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017;39(4):369–383. doi:10.1080/13803395.2016.1230181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Curtis KL, Bianchini KJ, Ord JS. Are the original and second edition of the California Verbal Learning Test equally accurate in detecting malingering? Assessment. 2009;16(3):237–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test — fourth Edition [WAIS-IV). San Antonio (TX): Pearson; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Babikian T, Boone KB, Lu P, Arnold G. Sensitivity and specificity of various digit span scores in the detection of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;20(1):145–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA. Aggregating validity indicators: the salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019;26(2):155–172. doi:10.1080/23279095.2017.1384925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Abeare CA. Stronger together: the Wechsler adult intelligence scale – fourth Edition as a multivariate performance validity test in patients with traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020;35(2):188–204. doi:10.1093/arclin/acz032/5613200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Hurtubise JL, Charron C, Dunn A, Enache A, McDermott A, Hirst R. The D-KEFS Trails as performance validity tests. Psychol Assess. 2018;30(8):1081–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Lichtenstein JD. Information processing speed tests as PVTs. In: Boone KB, editor. Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment. A neuropsychological perspective. New York (NY): Guilford; 2020. p. 218–247.
   Google Scholar
• Etherton JL, Bianchini KJ, Heinly MT, Greve KW. Pain, malingering, and performance on the WAIS-III processing speed index. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28(7):1218–1237. doi:10.1080/13803390500346595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenstein MF, Baker WJ, Gola T. Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(3):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218
   Google Scholar
• Heinly MT, Greve KW, Bianchini K, Love JM, Brennan A. WAIS Digit-Span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury. Assessment. 2005;12(4):429–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtubise J, Baher T, Messa I, Cutler L, Shahein A, Hastings M, Carignan-Querqui M, Erdodi L. Verbal fluency and digit span variables as performance validity indicators in experimentally induced malingering and real world patients with TBI. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2020;1–18. doi:10.1080/21622965.2020.1719409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasinski LJ, Berry DT, Shandera AL, Clark JA. Use of the Wechsler adult intelligence scale digit span subtest for malingering detection: a meta-analytic review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33(3):300–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias CW, Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Houston RJ, Crouch JA. Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction using the reliable digit span in traumatic brain injury. Assessment. 2002;9(3):301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese CS, Suhr JA, Riddle TL. Exploration of malingering indices in the Wechsler adult intelligence scale – fourth edition digit span subtest. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27:176–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder RW, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Baade LE, Marshall PS. Reliable digit span: a systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment. 2012;19(1):21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shura RD, Martindale SL, Taber KH, Higgins AM, Rowland JA. Digit Span embedded validity indicators in neurologically-intact veterans. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020;34(5):1025–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer RJ, Axelrod BN, Drag LL, Waldron-Perrine B, Pangilinan PH, Bieliauskas LA. WAIS-IV reliable digit span is no more accurate than age corrected scaled score as an indicator of invalid performance in a veteran sample undergoing evaluation for mTBI. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(8):1362–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueblood W. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of malingered and other invalid WAIS-R and clinical memory data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;14(4):697–707. doi:10.1080/01688639408402671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber TA, Soble JR. Utility of various WAIS-IV digit span indices for identifying noncredible performance among performance validity among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees. Clin Neuropsychol. 2018;32(4):657–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashendorf L. Rey auditory verbal learning test and Rey–osterrieth complex figure test performance validity indices in a VA polytrauma sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;33(8):1388–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod BN, Schutte C. Concurrent validity of three forced-choice measures of symptom validity. Appl Neuropsychol. 2011;18(1):27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer L, Yantz CL, Ryan LM, Warden DL, McCaffrey RJ. An examination of the California verbal learning Test II to detect incomplete effort in a traumatic brain injury sample. Appl Neuropsychol. 2005;12(4):202–207. doi:10.1207/s15324826an1204_3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaskewitz N, Merten T, Brockhaus R. Detection of suboptimal effort with the Rey complex figure test and recognition trial. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009;16:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortnik KE, Boone KB, Marion SD, Amano S, Ziegler E, Victor TL, Zeller MA. Examination of various WMS-III logical memory scores in the assessment of response bias. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24(2):344–357. doi:10.1080/13854040903307268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis KL, Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Brennan A. California verbal learning test indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: sensitivity and specificity in traumatic brain injury. Assessment. 2006;13(1):46–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders J, Strong CH. Embedded effort indicators on the California verbal learning test – second edition (CVLT-II): an attempted cross-validation. Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;25:173–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Abeare CA, Medoff B, Seke KR, Sagar S, Kirsch NL. A single error is one too many: the forced choice recognition trial on the CVLT-II as a measure of performance validity in adults with TBI. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2018;33(7):845–860. doi:10.1093/arclin/acx110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langeluddecke PM, Lucas SK. Quantitative measures of memory malingering on the Wechsler memory scale—third edition in mild head injury litigants. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18(2):181–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BA, Donders J. Predictors of invalid neuropsychological performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2004;18(10):975–984. doi:10.1080/02699050410001672350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai J, An KY, Charles J, Ali S, Erdodi LA. Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Rey Complex Figure Test. Psychol Neurosci. 2019;12(4):451–472. doi:10.1037/pne0000175.
   Google Scholar
• Resch ZJ, Pham AT, Abramson DA, White DJ, DeDios-Stern S, Soble JR. Examining independent and combined accuracy of embedded performance validity tests in the California verbal learning Test-II and brief visuospatial memory-revised for detecting invalid performance. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Root JC, Robbins RN, Chang L, Van Gorp WG. Detection of inadequate effort on the California verbal learning Test - second edition: forced choice recognition and critical item analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:688–696. doi:10.1017/S1355617706060838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz ES, Erdodi L, Rodriguez N, Jyotsna JG, Curtain JR, Flashman LA, Roth RM. CVLT-II forced choice recognition trial as an embedded validity indicator: a systematic review of the evidence. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016;22(8):851–858. doi:10.1017/S1355617716000746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shura RD, Miskey HM, Rowland JA, Yoash-Gatz RE, Denning JH. Embedded performance validity measures with postdeployment veterans: cross-validation and efficiency with multiple measures. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016;23:94–104. doi:10.1080/23279095.2015.1014556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramson DA, Resch ZJ, Ovsiew GP, White DJ, Bernstein MT, Basurto KS, Soble JR. Impaired or invalid? Limitations of assessing performance validity using the Boston naming test. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/23279095.2020.1774378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An KY, Charles J, Ali S, Enache A, Dhuga J, Erdodi LA. Re-examining performance validity cutoffs within the complex ideational material and the Boston naming test-short form using an experimental malingering paradigm. J Clin Exper Neuropsychol. 2019;41(1):15–25. doi:10.1080/13803395.2018.1483488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis KL, Thompson LK, Greve KW, Bianchini KJ. Verbal fluency indicators of malingering in traumatic brain injury: classification accuracy in known groups. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;22:930–945. doi:10.1080/13854040701563591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Dunn AG, Seke KR, Charron C, McDermott A, Enache A, Maytham C, Hurtubise J. The Boston naming test as a measure of performance validity. Psychol Inj Law. 2018;11:1–8. doi:10.1007/s12207-017-9309-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Roth RM. Low scores on BDAE complex ideational material are associated with invalid performance in adults without aphasia. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2017;24(3):264–274. doi:10.1080/23279095.2017.1298600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Tyson BT, Abeare CA, Lichtenstein JD, Pelletier CL, Rai JK, Roth RM. The BDAE complex ideational material – a measure of receptive language or performance validity? Psychol Inj Law. 2016;9:112–120. doi:10.1007/s12207-016-9254-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson GI, Binder LM. Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15(2):829–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis SR, Ross SR, Ricker JH. Detection of incomplete effort of the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised: a cross-validation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20(2):167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, Theroux-Fichera S, Zielinski RE, Heilbronner RL. Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1995;26(5):491–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, Theroux S, Aguila-Puentes G, Bianchini K, Greve K, Rayls K. Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-3rd Edition. Clin Neuropsychol. 2001;15(4):440–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman MA, Axelrod BN. Embedded measures of performance validity using verbal fluency tests in a clinical sample. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2015;22(2):141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare C, Sabelli A, Taylor B, Holcomb M, Dumitrescu C, Kirsch N, Erdodi L. The importance of demographically adjusted cutoffs: age and education bias in raw score cutoffs within the Trail Making Test. Psychol Inj Law. 2019;12(2):170–182. doi:10.1007/s12207-019-09353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashendorf L, O’Bryant SE, McCaffrey RJ. Specificity of malingering detection strategies in older adults using the CVLT and WCST. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17(2):255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DenBoer JW, Hall S. Neuropsychological test performance of successful brain injury simulators. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;21(6):943–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gligorović M, Buha N. Conceptual abilities of children with mild intellectual disability: analysis of Wisconsin card sorting test performance. J Intell Dev Disab. 2013;38(2):134–140. doi:10.3109/13668250.2013.772956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Mathias CW, Houston RJ, Crouch JA. Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction with the Wisconsin card sorting test: a preliminary investigation in traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;16(2):179–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Heinly MT, Bianchini KJ, Love JM. Malingering detection with the Wisconsin card sorting test in mild traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:343–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson GL, Lange RT, Green P, Franzen MD. Detecting exaggeration and malingering with the trail making test. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;16(3):398–406. doi:10.1076/clin.16.3.398.13861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jodzio K, Biechowska D. Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of executive function impairments in stroke patients. Appl Neuropsychol. 2010;17(4):267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten T, Bossink L, Schmand B. On the limits of effort testing: symptom validity tests and severity of neurocognitive symptoms in nonlitigant patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007;29(3):308–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten T, Green P, Henry M, Blaskewitz N, Brockhaus R. Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:719–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr JA, Boyer D. Use of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in the detection of malingering in student simulator and patient samples. J Clin Exp Psychol. 1999;21(5):701–708. doi:10.1076/jcen.21.5.701.868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Kirsch NL, Sabelli AG, Abeare CA. The Grooved Pegboard Test as a validity indicator – A study on psychogenic interference as a confound in performance validity research. Psychol Inj Law. 2018;11(4):307–324. doi:10.1007/s12207-018-9337-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Seke KR, Shahein A, Tyson BT, Sagar S, Roth RM. Low scores on the Grooved Pegboard Test are associated with invalid responding and psychiatric symptoms. Psychol Neurosci. 2017;10(3):325–344. doi:10.1037/pne0000103.
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Taylor B, Sabelli A, Malleck M, Kirsch NL, Abeare CA. Demographically adjusted validity cutoffs in the Finger tapping test are superior to raw score cutoffs. Psychol Inj Law. 2019;12(2):113–126. doi:10.1007/s12207-019-09352-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An KY, Kaploun K, Erdodi LA, Abeare CA. Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: a comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs. Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;31(1):193–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roye S, Calamia M, Bernstein JP, De Vito AN, Hill BD. A multi-study examination of performance validity in undergraduate research participants. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;33(6):1138–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald B, Duits AA, Leentjens AF, Verhey FR, Ponds RW. Performance and symptom validity assessment in patients with apathy and cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020;26(3):314–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ, Millis SR, Meyers JE. 40 plus or minus 10, a new magical number: reply to Russel. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:841–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin PK, Schroeder RW. Base rates of invalid test performance across clinical non-forensic contexts and settings. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020;35(6):717–725. doi:10.1093/arclin/acaa017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz M, Underhill J. Estimated costs of malingered disability. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(7):633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning JH, Shura RD. Cost of malingering mild traumatic brain injury-related cognitive deficits during compensation and pension evaluations in the veterans benefits administration. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019;26(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi LM, Green D, Einzig S, Belfi B. Evaluation of the response bias scale and improbable failure scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(5):531–541. doi:10.1037/pas0000364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odland AP, Lammy AB, Martin PK, Grote CL, Mittenberg W. Advanced administration and interpretation of multiple validity tests. Psychol Inj Law. 2015;8(1):46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson. Advanced clinical solutions for the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV – technical manual. San Antonio (TX): Author; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi LA, Roth RM, Kirsch NL, Lajiness-O’Neill R, Medoff B. Aggregating validity indicators embedded in Conners’ CPT-II outperforms individual cutoffs at separating valid from invalid performance in adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;29(5):456–466. doi:10.1093/arclin/acu026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu PH, Boone KB, Cozolino L, Mitchell C. Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and the Meyers and Meyers recognition trial in the detection of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17(3):426–440. doi:10.1076/clin.17.3.426.18083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reedy SD, Boone KB, Cottingham ME, Glaser DF, Lu PH, Victor TL, Ziegler EA, Zeller MA, Wright MJ. Cross validation of the Lu and colleagues (2003) Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test effort equation in a large known-group sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28:30–37. doi:10.1093/arclin/acs106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson BT, Baker S, Greenacre M, Kent KJ, Lichtenstein JD, Sabelli A, Erdodi LA. Differentiating epilepsy from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures using neuropsychological test data. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;87:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lace JW, Grant AF, Kosky KM, Teague CL, Lowell KT, Gfeller JD. Identifying novel embedded performance validity test formulas within the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status: a simulation study. Psychol Inj Law. 2020;13:303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone L, Cooke DJ. Feigned intellectual deficits on the Wechsler adult intelligence scale‐revised. British J Clin Psychol. 2003;42(3):303–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Miller, SW, Taylor, MJ, & Grant, I. 2004. Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar