Patients With Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Obtain Information Regarding Diagnosis, Management, and Recovery from Low-Quality Online Resources

References

• Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN, et al. Codominance of the individual posterior cruciate ligament bundles. An analysis of bundle lengths and orientation. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(2):221–225. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310021101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPrade CM, Civitarese DM, Rasmussen MT, et al. Emerging updates on the posterior cruciate ligament: a review of the Current literature. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(12):3077–3092. doi: 10.1177/0363546515572770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee. 2006;13(3):184–188. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA. Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14(1):35–38. doi: 10.1177/036354658601400107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DV, Allen AA, Warren RF, et al. The nonoperative treatment of acute, isolated (partial or complete) posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: an intermediate-term follow-up study. HSS J Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg. 2007;3(2):137–146. doi: 10.1007/s11420-007-9058-z
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg P, Grau L, Kaplan L, et al. Knee injuries in American Football: an epidemiological review. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ. 2016;45(6):368–373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders TL, Pareek A, Barrett IJ, et al. Incidence and long-term follow-up of isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2017;25(10):3017–3023. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4052-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T. Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated nonoperatively. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1526–1533. doi: 10.1177/0363546513486771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SH, Chien WC, Chung CH, et al. Long-term results of posterior cruciate ligament tear with or without reconstruction: a nationwide, population-based cohort study. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0205118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn S, Lee YS, Song YD, et al. Does surgical reconstruction produce better stability than conservative treatment in the isolated PCL injuries? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(6):811–819. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2454-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop. 2010;468(10):2566–2571. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1440-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrus MT, Werner BC, Starman JS, et al. Patient perceptions and Current trends in internet use by orthopedic outpatients. HSS J Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg. 2017;13(3):271–275. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9568-2
   Google Scholar
• Fraval A, Ming Chong Y, Holcdorf D, et al. Internet use by orthopaedic outpatients - current trends and practices. Australas Med J. 2012;5(12):633–638. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2012.1530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cassidy JT, Baker JF. Orthopaedic patient information on the world wide web: an essential review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(4):325–338. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil LS, Castle JP, Akioyamen NO, et al. What are patients asking and reading online? An analysis of online patient searches for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023;32(11):2245–2255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen TS, Driscoll DA, Islam W, et al. Modern internet search analytics and total joint arthroplasty: what are patients asking and reading online? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(4):1224–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Assessing MR. Controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and Viewer Beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244–1245. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starman JS, Gettys FK, Capo JA, et al. Quality and content of Internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(7):1612–1618. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Ambrosi R, Hewett TE. Validity of material related to the anterior cruciate ligament on TikTok. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(2):23259671241228543. doi: 10.1177/23259671241228543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ambrosi R, Milinkovic DD, Abermann E, et al. Quality of youtube videos regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft is unsatisfactory. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2024 Jan 6;S0749–8063(24)00002–1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.002
   Google Scholar
• D’Ambrosi R, Annibaldi A, Carrozzo A, et al. Evaluating the reliability of YouTube as a source of information for meniscal ramp lesions. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(1):23259671231219815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick JR, Kerzner B, Tuthill TA, et al. Patients with femoroacetabular impingement obtain information from low-quality sources online and are most interested in conservative treatment and expected recovery. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5(1):e21–e27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanthawala S, Vermeesch A, Given B, et al. Answers to health questions: internet search results versus online health community responses. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell JD. In mixed company: communicating in small groups. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, et al. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: a YouTube-based quality-control study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2020;36(1):233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiri M, Bruce-Brand RA, O’Neill F, et al. Surfing for hip replacements: has the “internet tidal wave” led to better quality information. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1339–1344.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerson JS, Bois AJ, Jeng J, et al. Quality of internet-based decision aids for shoulder arthritis: what are patients reading? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2018-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zsidai B, Engler ID, Narup E, et al. Delayed multiligament PCL reconstruction is associated with a higher prevalence of intraarticular injury and may influence treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06638-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon KH, Bae DK, Song SJ, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing arthroscopic single-bundle and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions preserving remnant fibers. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):474–480. doi: 10.1177/0363546510382206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, et al. Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury. 2004;35(12):1293–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li J, Wang J, et al. Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: a prospective, randomized study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2014;30(6):695–700. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergfeld JA, DR M, Parker RD, et al. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(2):129–136. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290020401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belayneh R, Lott A, Haglin J, et al. The role of patients’ overall expectations of health on outcomes following proximal humerus fracture repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2021;107(8):103043. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SW, Bae JY, Shin YH, et al. Patient expectations and satisfaction in hand surgery: a new assessment approach through a valid and reliable survey questionnaire. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0279341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(6):1273–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampersaud YR, Canizares M, Perruccio AV, et al. Fulfillment of patient expectations after spine surgery is critical to patient satisfaction: a cohort study of spine surgery patients. Neurosurgery. 2022;91(1):173–181. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarup I, Henn CM, Gulotta LV, et al. Patient expectations and satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery: a review of the literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(4):755–760. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.08.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sperling JW, Smith AM, Cofield RH, et al. Patient perceptions of open and arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2007;23(4):361–366. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar