Evidence-based treatment and supervision practices for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders in the criminal justice system

References

• Glaze LE, Kaeble D, Minton T. Correctional Population in the United States, 2014. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Glaze LE, Herberman EJ. Correctional Population in the United States, 2012. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Charitable Trusts. One in 100: Behind bars in America 2008. Washington, DC: The PEW Center on the States; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dear MJ, Wolch JR. Landscapes of despair: From deinstitutionalization to homelessness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb HR. Deinstitutionalization and the homeless mentally ill. Psychiatric Serv 1984;35:899–907.
   Google Scholar
• Torrey EF, Kennard AD, Eslinger D, Lamb R, Pavle J. More mentally ill persons are in jails and prisons than hospitals: A survey of the states. Arlington, VA: Treatment Advocacy Center; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Grella CE, Greenwell L, Prendergast M, Sacks S, Melnick G. Diagnostic profiles of offenders in substance abuse treatment programs. Behav Sci Law 2008;26:369–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM–IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurigio AJ. Co-occurring disorders: Mental health and drug misuse. In: Leukefeld T, Gullotta P, Gregrich J, eds. Handbook of Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Treatment in Criminal Justice Settings. New York, NY: Springer; 2011:279–292.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman JH, Peters RH, Carpenter C, Mueser KT, Jaeger ND, Gordon RB, Fisler C, et al. Six steps to improve your drug court outcomes for adults with co-occurring disorders. National Drug Court Institute and SAMHSA’s GAINS Center for Behavioral Health and Justice Transformation. Drug court practitioner fact sheet, Vol. 8. Alexandria VA: National Drug Court Institute, 2013;1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman, HJ, Osher, FC, Robbins PC, Case B, Samuels S. Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Serv 2009;60:761–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:617–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Behavioral health, United States, 2012. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2013: HHS Publication No. (SMA) 13–4797.
   Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Greenbaum PE, Edens JF, Carter CR, Ortiz MM. Prevalence of DSM-IV substance abuse and dependence disorders among prison inmates. Am J Drug and Alcoh Abuse 1998;24:573–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillargeon J, Williams BA, Mellow J, Harzke AJ, Hoge SK, Baillargeon G, Greifinger RB. Parole revocation among prison inmates with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Serv 2009;60:1516–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillargeon J, Penn JV, Knight K, Harzke AJ, Baillargeon G, Becker EA. Risk of reincarceration among prisoners with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders. Admin Pol Ment Health 2010;37:367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James DJ, Glaze LE. Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington DC; US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Robins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric Disorders in America: The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Mumola CJ, Karberg JC. Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington DC; US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2006:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Abram KM, Teplin LA. Co-occurring disorders among mentally ill jail detainees: Implications for public policy. Am Psychol 1991;46:1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiles JA, Cleve EV, Jemelka RP, Trupin EW. Substance abuse and psychiatric disorders in prison inmates. Psychiatric Serv 1990;41:1132–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Hiller ML, Knight K, Broome KM, Simpson DD. Compulsory community-based substance abuse treatment and the mentally ill criminal offender. Prison J 1996;76:180–191.
   Google Scholar
• Conway KP, Compton W, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:247–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Rojas E, Bartoi MG. Screening and assessment of co-occurring disorders in the justice system, 3rd edn. Delmar NY: SAMHSA’s National GAINS Center for Behavioral Health and Justice Transformation; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mueser KT, Noordsy DL, Drake RE, Fox L. Integrated treatment for dual disorders: A guide to effective practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Balyakina E, Mann C, Ellison M, Sivernell R, Fulda KG, Sarai SK, Cardarelli R. Risk of future offense among probationers with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders. Comm Men Health J 2014;50:288–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina N, Burdon W, Hagopian G, Prendergast M. One year return to custody rates among co‐disordered offenders. Behav Sci Law 2004;22:503–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe PJ, Christopher PP, Druhn N, Roy-Bujnowski KM, Grudzinskas Jr. AJ, Fisher WH. Arrest types and co-occurring disorders in persons with schizophrenia or related psychoses. J Behav Health Serv Res 2012;39:271–284.
   Google Scholar
• Peters RP, Wexler, HK, Lurigio AJ. Co-occurring substance use and mental disorders in the criminal justice system: A new frontier of clinical practice and research. Guest Editorial. Psychiatric Rehab J 2015;38:1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osher F, D’Amora DA, Plotkin M, Jarrett N, Eggleston A. adults with behavioral health needs under correctional supervision: A shared framework for reducing recidivism and promoting recovery. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shames A, Wilcox J, Subramanian R. Solitary confinement: Common misconceptions and emerging safe alternatives. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Kremling J, Bekman NM, Caudy MS. Co‐occurring disorders in treatment‐based courts: Results of a national survey. Behav Sci Law 2012;30:800–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Bekman NH. Treatment and reentry approaches for offenders with co-occurring disorders. In RB. In: Greifinger JB, Goldenson J, eds. Public health behind bars: From prisons to communities. New York: Springer Publishers; 2007:368–384.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt E, Peters RH, Kremling J. Behavioral health treatment history among persons in the justice system: Findings from the arrestee drug abuse monitoring II program. Psychiatric Rehab J 2015;38:7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osher F, Steadman HJ, Barr H. A best practice approach to community re-entry from jails for inmates with co-occurring disorders: The Apic Model. Delmar, NY: The National GAINS Center; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Osher F, Steadman HJ, Barr H. A best practice approach to community reentry from jails for inmates with co-occurring disorders: The APIC model. Crim and Del 2003;49:79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman RL, Lamberti JS, Price N. Integrating criminal justice, community healthcare, and support services for adults with severe mental disorders. Psychiatric Q 2004;75:71–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uggen C, Vuolo M, Lageson S, Ruhland E, Whitham HK. The edge of stigma: An experimental audit of the effects of low‐level criminal records on employment. Crim 2014;52:627–654.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas E, Peters RH. Evidence-based practices for co-occurring disorders in offenders. Addict Res Theory 2015:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osher FC. Integrating mental health and substance abuse services for justice-involved persons with co-occurring disorders. Delmar, NY: National GAINS Center; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews DA, Bonta J. The Psychology of criminal conduct, 4th edn. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler RK, Peters RH, Field G, Juliano-Bult D. Challenges in implementing evidence-based treatment practices for co-occurring disorders in the criminal justice system. Behav Sci Law 2004;22:431–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, RK, Fletcher BW, Volkow, ND. Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: Improving public health and safety. JAMA 2009;301:183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RD, Flora DB, Kroner DG, Mills JF, Varghese F, Steffan JS. Treating offenders with mental illness: A research synthesis. Law Human Behav 2012;36:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, ML, Pearson FS, Podus D, Hamilton ZK, Greenwell L. The Andrews’ principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes. J Exp Crim 2013;9:275–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher BW, Chandler RK. Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations: a research-based guide. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse; Publication No. NIH 06–5316.
   Google Scholar
• Horsfall J, Cleary M, Hunt GE, Walter G. Psychosocial treatments for people with co-occurring severe mental illnesses and substance use disorders (dual diagnosis): A review of empirical evidence. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2009;17:24–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinpeter C, Deschenes EP, Blanks J, Lepage CR, Knox M. Providing recovery services for offenders with co-occurring disorders. J Dual Diag 2006;3:59–85.
   Google Scholar
• Pinals DA, Packer IK, Fisher W, Roy-Bujnowski K. Relationship between race and ethnicity and forensic clinical triage dispositions. Psychiatric Serv 2004;55:873–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews DA, Bonta J, Wormith JS. The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crim Del 2006;52:7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta J, Andrews DA. Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehab 2007;6:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• McMurran M. Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Leg Crim Psychol 2009;14:83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews DA, Bonta J. Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychol Pub Pol Law 2010;16:39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem JL, Winter E, Kennealy PJ, Louden JE, Tatar JR. II, Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: Toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav 2014;38:212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RD, Fisher WH, Duan N, Mandracchia JT, Murray D. Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law Hum Behav 2010;34:324–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem JL, Steadman HJ, Manchak, SM. Applicability of the risk-need-responsivity model to persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Psychiatric Serv 2015;66:916–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta J, Wallace-Capretta S, Rooney J. A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program. Crim Just Behav 2000;27:312–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listwan SJ, Sundt JL, Holsinger AM, Latessa EJ. The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crim Del 2003;49:389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey MW, Landenberger NA, Wilson SJ. Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Oslo, Norway: Campbell Systematic Reviews; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Yochelson S, Samenow S. The criminal personality: A profile for change, Vol. 1. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman HJ, Stainbrook KA, Griffin P, Draine J, Dupont R, Horey C. A specialized crisis response site as a core element of police-based diversion programs. Psychiatric Serv 2001;52:219–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton MT, Bahora M, Watson A, Oliva J. A comprehensive review of extant research on crisis intervention team (CIT) programs. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2008;36:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane MW, Steadman HJ, Borum R, Veysey BM, Morrissey J. Emerging partnerships between mental health and law enforcement. Psychiatric Serv 1999;50:99–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfgott JB, Hickman MJ, Labossiere A. A descriptive evaluation of the Seattle Police Department’s crisis response team officer/mental health partnership pilot program. Int J Law Psychiatry 2016;44:109–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuland M, Draper L, Norton B. Improving responses to people with mental illnesses: Tailoring law enforcement initiatives to individual jurisdictions. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Adelman, J. Study in blue and grey, police interventions with people with mental illness: a review of challenges and responses. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Mental Health Association; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb HR, Shaner R, Elliott DM, DeCuir WJ, Foltz JT. Outcome for psychiatric emergency patients seen by an outreach police–mental health team. Psychiatric Serv 1995;46:1267–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwin DK. Police team with behavioral health group. Available from The Pawtucket Times (http://pawtuckettimes.com/content/police-team-behavioral-health-group), July 25, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hartford K, Carey R, Mendonca J. Pre-arrest diversion of people with mental illness: Literature review and international survey. Behav Sci Law 2006;24:845–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Baldry E. Mental health frequent presenters: Key concerns, case management, approaches, and policy and programme considerations for emergency services. In: Chappell D, ed. Policing and the Mentally Ill: International Perspectives. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2013;197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Reuland M, Schwarzfeld M, Draper L. Law enforcement responses to people with mental illnesses: A guide to research-informed policy and practice. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project. Council of State Governments Justice Center, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman HJ, Deane MW, Borum R, Morrissey J. Comparing outcomes of major models of police responses to mental health emergencies. Psychiatric Serv 2000;51:645–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broner N, Lattimore PK, Cowell AJ, Schlenger WE. Effects of diversion on adults with co‐occurring mental illness and substance use: Outcomes from a national multi‐site study. Behav Sci Law 2004;22:519–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman HJ, Naples M. Assessing the effectiveness of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness and co‐occurring substance use disorders. Behav Sci Law 2005;23:163–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draine J, Wilson AB, Pogorzelski W. Limitations and potential in current research on services for people with mental illness in the criminal justice system. J Off Rehab 2007;45:159–177.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell O, Wilson DB, Eggers A, MacKenzie DL. Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. J Crim Just 2012;20:60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman SB, Rempel M, Roman JK, Zweig JM, Lindquist CH, Green M, Downey PM, et al. The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: The impact of drug courts. Final report, Vol. 4. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Burns PJ, Hiday VA, Ray B. Effectiveness 2 years post-exit of a recently established mental health court. Am Behav Sci 2013;57:189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman HJ, Callahan L, Robbins PC, Vesselinov R., McGuire TG, Morrissey JP. Criminal justice and behavioral health care costs of mental health court participants: A six-year study. Psychiatric Serv 2014;65:1100–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks S, Pearson FS. Co-occurring substance use and mental disorders in offenders: Approaches, findings and recommendations. Fed Prob 2003;67:32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sarteschi CM, Vaughn MG, Kim K. Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review. J Crim Just 2011;39:12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ME, Hiday VA. Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants. Law Hum Behav 2006;30:659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothbard AB, Wald H, Zubritsky C, Jaquette N, Chhatre S. Effectiveness of a jail‐based treatment program for individuals with co‐occurring disorders. Behav Sci Law 2009;27:643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiday VA, Ray B, Wales H. Long-term impacts of mental health courts: Recidivsm two years after exit. Psychiatric Serv, 2016;67:378–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezansoff SN, Monirmcuzzaman A, Clark E, Somers JM. Beyond recidivism: Changes in health and social service involvement following exposure to drug treatment court. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Pol 2015;10:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney MK. Procedural justice and the judge–probationer relationship in a co-occurring disorders court. Int J Law Psychiatry 2014;37:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman FS. Findings from a national survey of correctional agencies on substance abuse treatment and health services: Who can get served? In: Chandler RK, Condon TP, eds. Drug abuse treatment within the criminal justice system: Addressing our Nation’s public health needs. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Diego, CA, May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Council of State Governments Justice Center. Lessons from the states: Reducing recidivism and curbing corrections costs through justice reinvestment. New York NY: Council of State Governments; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Houser KA, Blasko BL, Belenko S. The effects of treatment exposure on prison misconduct for female prisoners with substance use, mental health, and co-occurring disorders. Crim Just Stud 2014;27:43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JM, Miller HV. Validating program fidelity: Lessons from the Delaware County second chance initiatives. Am J Crim Just 2015;41:112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell B. New approaches to the treatment of women with co-occurring disorders in jails. Am Jails 1999:21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Spjeldnes S, Jung H, Maguire L, Yamatani H. Positive family social support: Counteracting negative effects of mental illness and substance abuse to reduce jail ex-inmate recidivism rates. J Hum Behav Soc Envir 2012;22:130–147.
   Google Scholar
• Miller HV, Miller JM. Community in‐reach through jail reentry: Findings from a quasi‐experimental design. Just Q 2010;27:893–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberti JS, Weisman RL, Schwarzkopf SB, Price N, Ashton RM, Trompeter J. The mentally ill in jails and prisons: Towards an integrated model of prevention. Psychiatric Q 2001;72:63–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowa-Kollisch S, Lim S, Summers C, Cohen L, Selling D, Venters H. Beyond the bridge: Evaluating a novel mental health program in the New York City jail system. Am J Pub Health 2014;104:2212–2218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JM, Miller HV, Barnes JC. Outcome evaluation of a family-based jail reentry program for substance abusing offenders. Prison J 2016;96:53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahr SJ, Harris PE, Strobell JH, Taylor BM. An evaluation of a short-term drug treatment for jail inmates. Int J Off Ther Comp Crim 2012;57:1275–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitch DA, Carleton S, Koutsenok IB, Marsolais K. Therapeutic community treatment in prisons. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM, Farabee D, eds. Treatment of Drug Offenders: Policies and Issues. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2002;127–137.
   Google Scholar
• McKendrick K, Sullivan C, Banks S, Sacks S. Modified therapeutic community treatment for offenders with MICA disorders: Antisocial personality disorder and treatment outcomes. J Off Rehab 2006;44:133–159.
   Google Scholar
• Van Stelle KR, Moberg DP. Outcome data for MICA clients after participation in an institutional therapeutic community. J Off Rehab 2004;39:37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang SX, Roberts RE, McCollister KE. Therapeutic community in a California prison: Treatment outcomes after 5 years. Crim Delin 2009;57:82–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magor-Blatch L, Bhullar N, Thomson B, Thorsteinsson E. A systematic review of studies examining effectiveness of therapeutic communities. Therapeutic Communities: Int J Ther Comm 2014;35:168–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hills HA. Creating effective treatment programs for persons with co-occurring disorders in the justice system. Delmar, NY: National GAINS Center; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks S, Sacks JY, McKendrick K, Banks S, Stommel, J. Modified TC for MICA offenders: Crime outcomes. Behav Sci Law 2004;22:477–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks S, McKendrick K, Sacks JY, Cleland CM. Modified therapeutic community for co-occurring disorders: Single investigator meta-analysis. Subst Abuse 2010;31:146–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks S, Chaple M, Sacks JY, McKendrick K, Cleland CM. Randomized trial of a reentry modified therapeutic community for offenders with co-occurring disorders: Crime outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat 2012;42:247–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton DS, Pearson FS, Cleland CM, Yee D. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment methods on offender recidivism: Meta-analytic outcomes from the CDATE project. In: McGuire J, ed. Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Re-Offending. West Sussex, UK: Wiley; 2002:79–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan CJ, Sullivan CJ, McKendrick K, Sacks S, Banks S. Modified therapeutic community treatment for offenders with MICA disorders: Substance use outcomes. The Am J Drug Alcoh Abuse 2007;33:823–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne A, Miller B, Maguin E. Prevalence and severity of lifetime physical and sexual victimization among incarcerated women. Int J Law Psychiatry 1999;22:301–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson DJ. Drug abuse and incarcerated women: A research review. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998;15:579–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins CA, Martin SS, Surratt HL. Substance abuse treatment, anticipated maternal roles, and reentry success of drug-involved women prisoners. Crim Delin 2009;55:388–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Montalvo J, López-Goñi JJ, Illescas C, Landa N, Lorea I. Evaluation of a therapeutic community treatment program: A long-term follow-up study in Spain. Subst Use Misuse 2008;43:1362–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina N, Grella CE, Cartier J, Torres S. A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. J Subst Abuse Treat 2010;38:97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyez V, Broekaert E, Yves R. Social network involvement during therapeutic community treatment: Is there an impact on success? Ther Comm 2006 27:45–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks S, Banks S, McKendrick K, Sacks JY. Modified therapeutic community for co-occurring disorders: A summary of four studies. J Subst Abuse Treat;34:112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh WN. A multisite evaluation of prison-based therapeutic community drug treatment. Crim Just Behav 2007;34;1481–1498.
   Google Scholar
• Hiller ML, Knight K, Leukefeld C, Simpson DD. Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Crim Just Behav 2002;29:56–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton Z. Do reentry courts reduce recidivism? Results from the Harlem Parole reentry court. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cusack KJ, Morrissey JP, Cuddeback GS, Prins A, Williams DM. Criminal justice involvement, behavioral health service use, and costs of forensic assertive community treatment: A randomized trial. Comm Ment Health J 2010;46, 356–363.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta J, Rugge T, Scott TL, Bourgon G, Yessine AK. Exploring the black box of community supervision. J Off Rehab 2008;47:248–270.
   Google Scholar
• Senior P, Wong K, Culshaw A, Ellingworth D, O’Keefe C, Meadows L. Process evaluation of five integrated offender management pioneer areas. Hallam Centre for community justice, ecotec research, and consultancy. Sheffield Hallam University, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Council of State Governments. Report of the reentry policy council: Charting the safe and successful return of prisoners to the community. New York: Council of State Governments; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen AN, Golden JF, Young AS. Peer wellness coaches for adults with mental illness. Psychiatric Serv 2014;65:129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruschak LM, Parks E. Probation and Parole in the United States, 2011. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ditton PM. Mental health treatment of inmates and probationers. Bureau of Justice Special Reports, NCJ 174463. Washington DC: US Department of Justice; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Louden JE, Skeem JL, Camp J, Christensen. Supervising probations with mental disorder: How do agencies respond to violations? Crim Just Behav 2008;35:832–847.
   Google Scholar
• Lurigio AJ, Epperson MW, Canada KE, Babchuk LC. Specialized probation programs for people with mental illnesses: A review of practices and research. J Crim Just 2012;35:317–326.
   Google Scholar
• Skeem JL, Manchak S, Peterson JK. Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: Creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav, 2011;35:110–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr WA, Cassidy JJ. Treatment attrition of probationers with mental illness from an enhanced day reporting center. Int J Off Ther Comp Crim 2014;60:694–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermann M. An analysis of New Jersey’s day reporting program and halfway back programs: Embracing the rehabilitative ideal through evidence based practices. J Off Rehab 2009;48:139–153.
   Google Scholar
• National GAINS Center. The prevalence of co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders in jails. Fact sheet series. Delmar NY: National GAINS Center; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Skeem J, Nicholson E, Kregg C. Understanding barriers to re-entry for parolees with mental disorder. In: Kroner D, ed. Mentally disordered offenders: A special population requiring special attention. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Jacksonville FL, March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Crisanti AS, Case BF, Isakson BL, Steadman HJ. Understanding study attrition in the evaluation of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness or co-occurring substance use disorders. Crim Just Behav 2014;41:772–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osher FM, D’Amora DA, Plotkin M, Jarrett N, Eggleston A. Adults with behavioral health needs under correctional supervision: A shared framework for reducing recidivism and promoting recovery. New York NY: Council of State Governments; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Vera Institute of Justice. Treatment alternatives to incarceration for people with mental health needs in the criminal justice system: The cost-savings implications. Report summary. New York NY: Vera Institute of Justice; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud D. On life support: public health in the age of mass incarceration. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rich JD, Chandler R, Williams BA, Dumont D, Wang EA, Taxman FS, Allen SA, et al. How health care reform can transform the health of criminal justice-involved individuals. Health Aff 2014;33:462–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar