Predictors of Prison-Based Treatment Outcomes: A Comparison of Men and Women Participants

REFERENCES

• Ashley O, Marsden ME, Brady TM. Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: a review. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2003; 29(1):19–53. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A. Prisoners in 1999. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Beck A. Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom B, Owen B, Covington S. Gender-responsive strategies: research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Available at http://nicic.org/pubs/2003/018017.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Blume S. Women, alcohol and drugs. In Substance Abuse. A Comprehensive Textbook. Lowinson J, Ruiz P, Millman R, Langrod J, eds. Baltimore: Williams, & Wilkins, 1992; 794–807.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht ML, O'Brien A, von Mayrhauser C, Anglin MD. Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addictive Behaviors 2003; 29:89–106. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome K, Knight K, Hiller M, Simpson D. Drug treatment process indicators for probationers and prediction of recidivism. J Subst Abuse Treat 1996; 13(6):487–491. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdon W, Farabee D, Prendergast M, Messina N, Cartier J. Evaluating prison-based therapeutic community substance abuse programs: the California Initiative. Federal Probation 2002; 66(3):3–8. [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Burdon W, Messina N, Prendergast M. The California treatment expansion initiative: Participant characteristics, aftercare participation, recidivism, and predictors of outcome. The Prison Journal 2004; 84(1):61–80. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington S, Surrey J. The relational theory of women's psychological development: Implications for substance abuse. In Gender and Alcohol: Individual and Social Perspectives. Wilsnak S, Wilsnak R, eds. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1997; 335–351.
   Google Scholar
• Covington S. Women in prison: Approaches in the treatment of our most invisible population. Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press, Inc, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• De La Rosa MR, White MS. A review of the role of social support systems in the drug use behavior of Hispanics. J Psychoactive Drugs 2001; 33(3):233–240. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon G. The Therapeutic Community: Theory, Model, and Method. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon G, Jainchill N. Male and female drug abusers: social and psychological status 2 years after treatment in a therapeutic community. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1981; 8(4):465–497. [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grella C, Gillmore J. Improving service delivery to the dually diagnosed in Los Angeles County. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 23:115–122. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grella C, Joshi V. Gender differences in drug treatment careers among clients in the national drug abuse treatment outcome study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1999; 25(3):385–406. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grella CE, Stein JA, Greenwell L. Associations among childhood trauma, adolescent problem behaviors, and adverse adult outcomes in substance-abusing women offenders. Psychology of Addicted Behavior 2005; 19:43–53. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall E, Prendergast M, Wellisch J, Patten M. Treating Drug Abusing Women Prisoners: An outcomes evaluation of the Forever Free substance abuse treatment program. The Prison Journal 2004; 84(1):81–105. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison P, Beck A. Prisoners in 2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson D. Drug abuse and incarcerated women. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998; 15(6):579–587. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgins D, El-Guebaly N, Addington J. Treatment of substance abusers: single or mixed-gender programs? Addiction 1997; 92(7):805–812. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser Y, Anglin M, Booth M. Sex differences in addict careers. 3. addiction. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1987; 13:33–57. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman E. An Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for the Forever Free Substance Abuse Program at the California Institute for Women, Frontera, California, Sacramento: California Department of Correction, Office of Substance Abuse Programs, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Knight K, Simpson D, Hiller M. Three-year incarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal 1999; 79(3):337–351. [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Langan N, Pelissier B. Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. J Subst Abuse 2001; 13(3):291–301. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin S, Butzin C, Saum C, Inciardi J. Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release aftercare. The Prison Journal 1999; 79(3):294–320. [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Messina N, Burdon W, Hagopian G, Prendergast M. One-year return to custody rates among co-disordered offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 22:503–518. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina N, Burdon W, Prendergast M. Assessing the needs of women in institutional therapeutic communities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 2003; 37(2):89–106. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Messina N, Prendergast M. Therapeutic community treatment for women in prison: Assessing outcomes and needs. In Treating Addicted Offenders: A Continuum of Opportunities. Knight K, Farabee D, eds. New York: Civic Research Institute; 18, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Messina N, Wish E, Nemes S. Predictors of treatment outcomes in men and women admitted to a therapeutic community. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2000; 26(2):207–228. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen B. “In the mix”: Struggle and Survival in a Women's Prison. Albany: State University Press of New York, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Pelissier B, Wallace S, O'Neil J, Gaes G, Camp S, Rhodes W, Saylor W. Federal prison residential drug treatment reduces substance use and arrests after release. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2001; 42:315–337. [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelissier B, Camp S, Gaes G, Saylor W, Rhodes W. Gender differences in outcomes from prison-based residential treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 2003; 24:149–160. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R, Strozier A, Murrin M, Kearns W. Treatment of substance-abusing jail inmates: Examination of gender differences. J Subst Abuse Treat 1997; 14:339–349. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock J. Counseling women offenders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast M, Wellisch J, Wong M. Residential treatment for women parolees following prison-based drug treatment: Treatment experiences, needs, and services, outcomes. The Prison Journal 1996; 76(3):253–274. [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes W, Pelissier B, Gaes G, Saylor W, Camp S, Wallace S. Alternative solutions to the problem of selection bias in an analysis of federal residential drug treatment programs. Evaluation Review 2001; 25(3):331–369. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasilow-Mueller S, Erickson C. Drug abuse and dependency: Understanding gender differences in etiology and management. J Am Pharmacol Assoc 2001; 42(1):78–90. [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Wexler HK, De Leon G, Kressel D, Peters J. The amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1999; 26(2):147–167. [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler H, Falkin G, Lipton D, Rosenblum A. Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. In Drug Abuse Treatment and Jails. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series 118. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration. Rockville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990; 156–175.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler H, Melnick G, Lowe L, Peters J. Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. The Prison Journal 1999; 79(3):321–336. [CSA]
   Google Scholar