Access to Drug Abuse Treatment Under Treatment On Demand Policy in San Francisco

REFERENCES

• Johnson JL, Ahmed A, Plemons B, Powell W, Carringotn H, Graham J, Hill R, Schwartz RP, Brooner RK. Steps to Success: The Baltimore Drug and Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Study. Baltimore, MD: Baltimore Substance Abuse Services, 2002. Available at http://www.soros.org/baltimore/Executive%20Summary%20doc.pdf (Last accessed May 20, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Moore T. Sacramento County's Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Initiative. CSAT TIE Communique Fall'98 1997. Available at http://www.treatment.org/communique/comm98W/Sacramento.html (Last accessed May 20, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen W. SF proposes on-demand drug treatment: It's aimed at poor, youth. San Francisco Chronicle May 17, 1797; Section A, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon R. Mayor promises drug treatment on demand. San Francisco Examiner January 18, 1997; Section A, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Stein L. San Francisco pioneers plan to treat all drug users—Program will test whether treatment can reduce drug abuse—and save city money. The Christian Science Monitor January 29, 1997; 89(44): 4.
   Google Scholar
• Guydish J, Moore L, Gleghorn A, Davis T, Sears C, Harcourt J. Drug abuse treatment on demand in San Francisco: Preliminary findings. J. Psychoactive Drugs 2000; 32:363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears C. Investigating the Effects of San Francisco's Treatment on Demand Initiative on a Publicly-Funded Substance Abuse Treatment System: A Time Series Analysis. San Francisco, CA: UCSF Institute of Health Policy Studies, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg G, Neigher WD, Hammer RJ, Windle C, Woy JR. (Eds.) Evaluation in Practice: A Sourcebook of Program Evaluation Studies from Mental Health Care Systems in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Appel PW, Wllison AE, Jansky HK, Oldak R. Barriers to enrollment in drug abuse treatment and suggestions for reducing them: Opinions of drug injecting street outreach clients and other system stakeholders. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2004; 30:129–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardsley K, Wish E, Fitzelle D, O'Grady K, Arria A. Distance traveled to outpatient drug treatment and client retention. J Substance Abuse Treatment 2003; 25:279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanter M, Keller DS, Dermatis H, Egelko S. The impact of managed care on substance abuse treatment: A report of the American Society of Addiction Medicine. J Addictive Behaviors 2000; 19:13–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kail B, Elberth, M. Moving the Latina substance abuser toward treatment: The role of gender and culture. J Ethnicity Substance Abuse 2002; 3:3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Farabee D, Leukefeld CG, Hays L. Accessing drug-abuse treatment: perceptions of out-of-treatment injectors. J Drug Issues 1998; 28(2):381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight KR, Rosenbaum M, Kelley MS, Irwin J, Washburn A, Wenger L. Defunding the poor: The impact of lost access to subsidized methadone maintenance treatment on women injection drug users. J Drug Issues 1996; 26(4):923–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger DS, Lamb RJ, Kountz MR, Kirby KC, Marlowe D. Pretreatment dropout as a function of treatment delay and client variables. Addictive Behaviors 1995; 20:111–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain J, Strang J, Griffiths P, Powis B, Gossop M. Measuring met and unmet need of drug misusers: Integration of quantitative and qualitative data. European Addiction Research 2000; 6:97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French MT, Dunlap LJ, Galinis DN, Rachal JV, Zarkin GA. Health care reforms and managed care for substance abuse services: Findings from eleven case studies. J Public Health Policy 1996; 17:181–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger LD, Rosenbaum M. Drug treatment on demand—not. J Psychoactive Drugs 1994; 26(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancovitz SR, Des Jarlais DC, Peyser NP, Drew E, Friedmann P, Trigg HL, Robinson JW. A randomized trial of an interim methadone maintenance clinic. Am J Public Health 1991; 81:1185–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alterman AI, Bedrick J, Howden D, Maany I. Reducing waiting time for substance abuse treatment does not reduce attrition. J Substance Abuse 1994; 6:325–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Office of National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Strategy 2002. Available at http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/03ndcs/2priorities.html (Last accessed May 20, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kahn JG, Stump D, Davis T, McConnel CE, Gleghorn A, Stillwell J, Guydish J. Substance Abuse Treatment On Demand: The Effect of Increased Funding on Treatment Capacity in San Francisco, 1995–1999. San Francisco, CA: UCSF Institute of Health Policy Studies, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. SAS/ETS® User's Guide, Version 6. (Second Edition) (pp. 1, 22). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1993.
   Google Scholar