References
- Baltimore, D., P. Berg, M. Botchan, D. Carroll, R. A. Charo, G. Church, J. E. Corn, et al. 2015. “A Prudent Path Forward for Genomic Engineering and Germline Gene Modification.” Science 348 (6230): 36–38. doi:10.1126/science.aab1028.
- Battelle Technology Partnership Practice. 2013. Driving Regional Innovation and Growth: The 2012 Survey of North American University Research Parks. Prepared for Association of University Research Parks, August. https://aurp.memberclicks.net/assets/documents/aurp_batelllereportv2.pdf.
- Brooks, H. 1973. “The State of the Art: Technology Assessment as a Process.” International Social Science Journal 25 (3): 247–256.
- Brune, W. H. 2015. “The Ozone Story: A Model for Addressing Climate Change?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71 (1): 75–84. doi:10.1177/0096340214563685.
- Burnham, D. 1984. “Little-Known Agency Draws Worldwide Interest.” New York Times, January 12. http://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/12/us/little-known-agency-draws-worldwide-interest.html.
- Casper, B. M. 1978. “The Rhetoric and Reality of Congressional Technology Assessment.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 34 (2): 20–31. doi:10.1080/00963402.1978.11458465.
- Charo, R. A. 2015. “Yellow Lights for Emerging Technologies.” Science 349 (6246): 384–385. doi:10.1126/science.aab3885.
- Coates, J. F. 1976. “Technology Assessment – A Tool Kit.” ChemTech, June, 372–383.
- Coates, V., M. Farooque, R. Klavans, K. Lapid, H. A. Linstone, C. Pistorius, and A. L. Porter. 2001. “On the Future of Technological Forecasting.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 67 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00122-0.
- CrimeinAmerica.net. 2011. “Use of Cell Phones Cuts Crime.” February 3. http://www.crimeinamerica.net/2011/02/03/use-of-cell-phones-reduce-crime/.
- Diamond, D. M., and U. Ravnskov. 2015. “How Statistical Deception Created the Appearance that Statins are Safe and Effective in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.” Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology 8 (2): 201–210. doi:10.1586/17512433.2015.1012494.
- European Institute of Public Administration. 2016. “Working with Impact Assessment at the EU Level.” April 14–15. http://seminars.eipa.eu/en/activities09/show/&tid=5854.
- Gerstein, D. M. 2016. “How Genetic Editing Became a National Security Threat.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April 25. http://thebulletin.org/how-genetic-editing-became-national-security-threat9362.
- Gulbrandsen, M. 2011. “Research Institutes as Hybrid Organizations: Central Challenges to Their Legitimacy.” Policy Sciences 44 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1007/s11077-011-9128-4.
- Houghton, A. 1995. “In Memoriam: The Office of Technology Assessment, 1972–95.” Congressional Record, 104th Congress, Extension of Remarks, September 28, E1868–E1870. http://ota.fas.org/technology_assessment_and_congress/houghton/.
- Kahn, L. H. 2007. “Bring Back the Office of Technology Assessment.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May 20. http://thebulletin.org/bring-back-office-technology-assessment.
- Kelle, A. 2012. “H5N1: Bungling Dual-Use Governance.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 29. http://thebulletin.org/h5n1-bungling-dual-use-governance.
- Lewis, D., and M. Menzer. 2006. “Using Refrigerants Responsibly.” ASHRAE Journal 48 (9): 56–60.
- Linstone, H. A. 1970. “Technology Assessment Act of 1970.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2 (1): 109–110. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(70)90011-9.
- Loreto, E. L. S., and G. L. Wallau. 2016. “Risks of Wolbachia Mosquito Control.” Science 351 (6279): 1273. doi:10.1126/science.351.6279.1273-b.
- Mathewson, T. G. 2015. “UNESCO Recommends Global Monitoring System for Ed Progress.” EducationDive, May 27. http://www.educationdive.com/news/unesco-recommends- global-monitoring-system-for-ed-progress/399816/.
- Maxcer, C. 2015. “The Apple Watch as Bullsh*t Filter? We Can Only Hope.” Technewsworld, April 3. http://www.technewsworld.com/story/81903.html?rss=1.
- Mitroff, I. I., and M. Turoff. 1973. “Technological Forecasting and Assessment: Science and/or Mythology?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 5 (2): 113–134. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(73)90027-9.
- Mooney, C. 2005. “Requiem for an Office.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 61 (5): 40–49. doi:10.1080/00963402.2005.11460919.
- Moorthy, V. S., G. Karam, K. S. Vannice, and M.-P. Kieny. 2015. “Rationale for WHO’s New Position Calling for Prompt Reporting and Public Disclosure of Interventional Clinical Trial Results.” PLoS Medicine 12 (4): e1001819. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001819.
- National Academy of Engineering. 1969. A Study of Technology Assessment: Report of the Committee on Public Engineering Policy. Washington, DC: Committee on Science and Astronautics, US House of Representatives.
- New York Times. 2015. “A Pill to Boost Female Libido.” Editorial, June 12. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/12/opinion/a-pill-to-boost-female-libido.html.
- Phillips, F., and H. Linstone. 2016. “Key Ideas from a 25-Year Collaboration at Technological Forecasting & Social Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 105: 158–166. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.007.
- Porter, A. L. 1995. “Technology Assessment.” Impact Assessment 13 (2): 135–151. doi:10.1080/07349165.1995.9726087.
- Reuters. 2016. “Monsanto Sues California Over Herbicide Classification.” New York Times, January 21. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/22/business/monsanto-sues-california-over-herbicide-classification.html?_r=1.
- Ripin, B., and A. Fainberg. 2001. “Viewpoint: Bring Back the OTA!” APS News 10 (8), August/September. http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200108/viewpoint.cfm.
- Schaffhauser, D. 2015. “UNESCO Report Proposes International Measures for Monitoring Ed Progress.” Campus Technology, May 26. http://campustechnology.com/articles/2015/05/26/unesco-report-proposes-international-measures-for-monitoring-ed-progress.aspx.
- Scientific American. 2005. “Bring Back the OTA.” June 1. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bring-back-the-ota/.
- Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. E. 2016. “The Large Grey Area between ‘Bona Fide’ and ‘Rogue’ Stem Cell Interventions — Ethical Acceptability and the Need to Include Local Variability.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 109: 76–86. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.023.
- SSTI (State Science & Technology Institute). 2015. “EDA Announces $5M in Science and Research Park Development Grants.” May 28. http://ssti.org/blog/eda-announces-5m-science-and-research-park-development-grants.
- Travis, J. 2015. “Germline Editing Dominates DNA Summit.” Science 350 (6266): 1299–1300. doi:10.1126/science.350.6266.1299.
- Triebig, G. 2010. “Implications of Latency Period between Benzene Exposure and Development of Leukemia—A Synopsis of Literature.” Chemico-Biological Interactions 184 (1–2): 26–29. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2009.12.014.
- United Nations. 1979. Report of the United Nations Seminar on Technology Assessment for Development, Bangalore, India, 30 October–10 November, 1978. New York: Department of International Economic and Social Affairs.
- United Nations Secretariat. 1975. Report of the Expert Group on Technology Assessment, Convened under the Auspices of the Office of Science and Technology of the United Nations Secretariat, New York, June 23–27, 1975.
- US Economic Development Administration. 2016. “Fiscal Year 2015 Annual Report.” US Department of Commerce, June 27. https://www.eda.gov/annual-reports/files/fy2015/EDA-FY2015-Annual-Report-full.pdf.
- Van Dierdonck, R., K. Debackere, and M. A. Rappa. 1990. “An Assessment of Science and Technology Parks: Towards a Better Understanding of Their Role in the Emergence of New Technologies.” Working Paper 3169-90, Presented at the RADMA Conference, Manchester, July 10–11. Sloan School of Management, MIT. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46889.
- Van Eijndhoven, J. C. M. 1997. “Technology Assessment: Product or Process?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 269–286. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00210-7.
- Wad, A., and M. Radnor. 1984. “Technology Assessment: Review and Implications for Developing Countries.” In Science Policy Studies and Documents, edited by A. Wed, and M. Radnor. Paris: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Culture Organization.
- Wexler, C. 2015. “Bring Back the Office of Technology Assessment.” New York Times, May 28. http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/05/28/scientists-curbing-the-ethical-use-of-science/bring-back-the-office-of-technology-assessment.