References
- Archbold S. Implementing a paediatric cochlear implant programme: theory and practice. In: McCormick P,
- Archbold S, Sheppard S, eds. Cochlear implants for young children. London: Whurr. 1994; 25–59.
- Battmer RD, Gupta SP, Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, Lenarz T. Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual perfor-mance in 132 adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 116: 185–7.
- British Society of Audiology recommendation. Descriptors for pure tone audiograms, technical note. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 123.
- Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Fisher SG. A prospective randomized study of cochlear implants. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 233–7.
- Cohen et al. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of veterans affairs cochlear implant recipi-ents. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 462–5.
- Geier L, Fisher L, Barker M, Opie J. The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult Clarion® cochlear implant users. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108: 80–3.
- Helms J, Milner J, Schon J et al. Evaluation of performance with the COMBI40 cochlear implant in adults: a multi-centric clinical study. ORL 1997; 59: 23–35.
- Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA. Speech recognition with the Mpeak and Speak speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116: 163–7.
- Jauhiainen T. An experimental study of the auditory perception of isolated bi-syllable Finnish words. Aca-demic dissertation, University of Helsinki, 1974.
- Karlsson F. Suomen kielen äänne-ja muotorakenne. Hel-sinki: Werner Söderström, 1992.
- Kiefer J, Muller J, Pfennigdorff Th et al. Speech under-standing in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (Med-El Combi 40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL 1996; 58: 127–35.
- Palva T. Finnish speech audiometry: methods and clinical applications. Academic dissertation, University of Tur-ku, 1952.
- Proops DW, Stoddard RL, Donaldson I. Medical, surgical and audiological complications of the first 100 adult cochlear implant patients in Birmingham. J Laryngol Otol 1999; 113: 14–7.
- Rihkanen H. Rehabilitation assessment of postlingually deaf adults using single-channel intracochlear implants of vibrotactile aids. Academic dissertation, University of Helsinki, 1988.
- Statistics Finland. http://www.tilastokeskus.fi. June 20th, 2000.
- Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Cochlear implantation in the UK 1990–1994. Report by the MRC institute of hearing research on the evaluation of the national cochlear implant programme. London: HMSO Publica-tions Centre, 1995.
- Tyler RS, Summerfield AQ. Cochlear implantation: relationships with research in auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 38–50.
- van Dijk JE, Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Smoorenburg GF. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiol 1999; 38: 109–16.
- Waltzman SB, Niparko JK, Fisher SG, Cohen NL. Predictors of postoperative performance with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104 (Suppl. 165): 15–8.
- Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Implantation of patients with prelingual long-term deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Lar-yngol 1999; 108: 84–7.
- Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Everingham CE et al. Evaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (Speak) in postlinguis-tically deafened adults. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115: 629–37.