Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Teacher Volume 24, 2002 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
519
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluating the quality of teaching in medical education: are we using the evidence for both formative and summative purposes?

Margaret Elzubeir Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University
&
Diaa Rizk Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University
Pages 313-319 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

  • ALBANESE, M. & SKOCHELAK, S. (2000) University of Wisconsin Medical School, Academic Medicine, 75(9), pp. S411-S414.
  • ANDREWS, J. et al. (1996). The teaching and learning transaction in higher education: a study of excellent professors and their students, Teaching in Higher Education, 1, pp. 81-103.
  • BEATTIE, D.S. (2000) Expanding the view of scholarship, Academic Medicine, 75(9), pp. 871-876.
  • BENOR, D.E. (2000) Faculty development, teacher training and teacher accreditation in medical education: twenty years from now, Medical Teacher, 22(5), pp. 503-512.
  • BERMAN, E. (2000) A Short Guide to Evaluating Teaching (University of Arizona) [http://aerArizona.edu].
  • BOWLES, L.T. (2000) The evaluation of teaching, Medical Teacher, 22(3), pp. 221-224.
  • CASEY, R.J., GENTILE, P. & BIGGER, S.W. (1997). Teaching appraisal in higher education: an Australian perspective, Higher Education, 34, pp. 459-482.
  • CENTRA, J.A. (1993) Reflective Faculty Evaluation (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
  • CENTRA, J.A. (1994) The use of the teaching portfolio and student evaluation for summative evaluation, Journal of Higher Education, 65, pp55-70.
  • CHAPPLE, M. & MURPHY, R. (1996) the nominal group technique: extending the evaluation of students' teaching and learning experience, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, pp. 147-159.
  • COFFEY, M. & GIBBS, G. (2001) The evaluation of Student Evaluation of Educational Quality Questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK Higher Education, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), pp. 89-93.
  • COPELAND, H.L. & HEWSON, M.G. (2000) Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center, Academic Medicine, 75(2), pp. 161-166.
  • DAS, M., EL-SABBAN, F. & BENER, A. (1996) Student and faculty perceptions of the characteristics of an ideal teacher in a classroom setting, Medical Teacher, 18 (2), pp. 141-146.
  • ELZUBEIR, M. & RIZK, D. (2001) Identifying characteristics that students, interns and residents look for in their role models, Medical Education, 35, pp. 272-277.
  • FANTONE, J., WHITE, C. & WOOLLISCROFT, J.O. (2000) University of Michigan Medical School, Academic Medicine, 75(9), pp. S167-S172.
  • FINCHER, R.E. et al. (2000) Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21st century, Academic Medicine, 75(9), pp. 887-894.
  • FRANKFORD, D.M., PATTERSON, M.A. & KONRAD, T.R. (2000) Transforming practice organizations to foster lifelong learning and commitment to medical professionalism, Academic Medicine, 75 (7), pp. 708-717.
  • FRANKLIN, J. & THEALL, M. (1989) Who reads ratings: knowledge, attitude and practice of users of student ratings of instruction, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, California.
  • GJERDE, C.L., ALBANESE, M. & HOWARD, N. (1999) A faculty development program in basic teaching skills, Academic Medicine, 74, pp. 610-611.
  • GREEN, M.E., ELLIS, C.L., FREMONT, P. & BATTY, H. (1998) Faculty evaluation in Departments of Family Medicine: do our universities measure up?, Medical Education, 32, pp. 597-606.
  • HANSON, P.A. & ROBERTS, K.B. (1992) Putting teaching back at the center, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 4, pp. 136-139.
  • HARDEN, R.M. & CROSBY, J. (2000). AMEE Education Guide No.20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer--the twelve roles of the teacher, Medical Teacher, 22(4), pp. 334-347.
  • HEWSON, M.G. (2000), A theory based faculty development program for clinician-educators, Academic Medicine, 75(5), pp. 498-501.
  • HUTCHINSON, B. (1995) Staff appraisal: personal, professional and organizational development?, Educational Management and Administration, 23(4), pp. 47-57.
  • KORN, D. (1996) Reengineering the academic medical centre: reengineering academic values?, Academic Medicine, 71(10), pp. 1033-1043.
  • LEE, M.Y. (2000) Tufts University School of Medicine, Academic Medicine, 75 (9), pp. S158-S163.
  • MARSH, H.W. & DUNKCN, M.J. (1992) Students' evaluation of university teaching: a multidimensional perspective, in: J.C. Smart (Ed.) Higher Education: A Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 8 (New York, Agathon Press).
  • McKEACHIE, W.J. (1997) Do we need norms of student ratings to evaluate faculty?, Instructional Evaluation and Faculty Development, 14, pp. 14-17.
  • McLEAN, M. (2001) Rewarding teaching excellence. Can we measure teaching 'excellence'? Who should be the judge?, Medical Teacher, 23(1), pp. 6-11.
  • MENNIN, S.P. (1999) Standards for teaching in medical schools: double or nothing, Medical Teacher, 21(6), pp. 542-545.
  • NUTTER, D.O. et al. (2000) Measuring faculty effort and contributions in medical education, Academic Medicine, 75, (2), pp. 200-207.
  • PELSANG, R.E. & SMITH, W.L. (2000) Comparison of anonymous student ballots with student debriefing for faculty evaluations, Medical Education, 34, pp. 465-467.
  • PERRY, R.P., ABRAMI, P.C., LEVENTHAL, L. & CHECK, J. (1979) Instructor reputation: an expectancy relationship involving student ratings and achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(6), pp. 776-787.
  • SANTHANAM, E., BALLANTYNE, C., MULLIGAN, D., DE LA HARPE, B. & ELLIS, R. (2000) Student questionnaires and teaching evaluation: cutting the cloth to fit the purpose, in: A. Herrmann & M.M. Kulski (Eds) Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching, Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February, 2000 (Perth, Curtin University of Technology).
  • SCHRATZ, M. (1992) Researching while teaching: an action research approach in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 17(1), pp. 81-95.
  • SCRWEN, M.A. (1993) Unified theory approach to teacher evaluation, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, pp. 111-129.
  • SELDIN, P. (1991) The Teaching Portfolio: A Practical Guide to Improved Performance and Promotion/Tenure Decisions (Boston, MA, Anker Publishing).
  • SELDIN, P. (1993) Successful Use of Teaching Portfolios (Boston, MA, Anker Publishing).
  • SIMPSON, D.E., WENDELBERGER, M., DUTEUE, E.H. JR, SHEEHAN, K.M., HOLLOWAY, R.L. & TOWNE, J.B. (2000). Valuing educational scholarship at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Academic Medicine, 75(9), pp. 930-934.
  • SKEFF, K.M., STRATOS, G.A., BERGEN, M.R. & REGULA, D.P. (1998) A pilot study of faculty development for basic science teachers, Academic Medicine, 73(6), pp. 701-704.
  • SNELL, L. et al. (2000) A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges, Medical Education, 34(10), pp. 862-870.
  • TALLETT, S.E., SUGAR, L., CATTON, P.A. & ROTHMAN, A.I. (1998) Principles and procedures for reviewing or establishing a teaching evaluation system for postgraduate medicine, Annals of the RCPSC, 31(7), pp. 309-313.
  • WILKERSON, L. & IRBY, D.M. (1998) Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development, Academic Medicine, 73(4), pp. 387-396.
  • WILKES, M. & BLIGH, J. (1999) Evaluating educational interventions, British Medical Journal, 318(7193), pp. 1269-1272.
  • WILLIAMS, B.C., PILLSBURY, M.S., STERN, D.T. & GRUM, C.M. (2001) Comparison of resident and medical student evaluation of faculty teaching, Evaluation in the Health Professions, 24(1), pp. 53-60.
  • ZUBER-SKERRITT, O. (1993) Improving learning and teaching through action learning and action research, Higher Education Research & Development, 12(1), pp. 45-58.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.