85
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Ensuring reliability in UK written tests of general practice: the MRCGP examination 1998–2003

, , , , &
Pages 37-45 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

  • BARNETT, R. (1989) How Shall We Assess Them?, Information Services, Discussion Paper 1 (London, Council for National Academic Awards)
  • BELTON, A. (1986) How to increase your trainee pass rate in the MRCGP examination, Journal of the Association of Course Organizers, 2, pp. 56–64. BFaucowtrz, D., Woucowrrz, B., Frrot, R. & KOPIUVA, R. (2000) The Use of Tests as Part of high-Stakes Decision for Students: A Resources Guide for Educators and Policy-Makers (Washington, DC, US Department of Education).
  • BIGGS, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality at University (Buckingham, SRHE/ Open University Press).
  • BLOOM, B.S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain (New York, D. Mckay).
  • BRADDOCK, R., LLOYD-JONES, R. & SCHOER, L. (1963) Research in Written Composition (Urbana, IL, National Council of Teachers of English). BRENNAN, R.L. (1983) Elements of Generalisability Theory (Iowa, ACT Publications).
  • CHASE, C.I. (1986) The impact of some obvious variables on essay test scores, Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, pp. 33–42.
  • CRONBACH, L.J. (1951) Co-efficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, pp. 292–334.
  • CROSSLEY, J., DAVIES, H., HUMPHIUS, G. & JOLLY, B. (2002) Generalisability: a key to unlock professional assessment, Medical Education, 36, pp. 972–978.
  • FELDT, L.S. & BRENNAN, R.L. (1989) Reliability, in: R.L. Litvx (Ed.) Educational Measurement, 3rd edn (Washington, DC, American Council on Education/Macmillan Series on Higher Education).
  • FoRstw, M. & MASTERS, G. (1996) Portfolios (Victoria, AustralianCouncil for Educational Research).
  • FRENCH, J.W. (1966) Schools of thought in judging excellence of English themes, in: A. ANASTASI (Ed.) Testing Problems in Perspective (Washington, DC, American Council on Education). P.H.A.M., VAN DER VLEuTEN, C.P.M., VERWIJNEN, G.M. & VAN T .FAUWEN, T.D. (1990) The effect of structure in scoring methods on the reproducibility of tests using open ended questions, in: W. BENDER, R.J. flinms-ntA, A.J.J.A. SCHERMER & RP. ZWIERSTRA (Eds) Teaching and Assessing Clinical Competence (Amsterdam, Boekwerk), pp. 466–471.
  • FRY, J., FAWLEY, J.H., PiNsENT, R.J.F.H. (Eds) (1983) A History of the Royal College of General Practitioners: the First 25 Years (Lancaster, MTP Press).
  • GORMAN, T.P., WHITE, J., ORCHARD, L. et al. (1983) Language Performance in School: Secondary Survey Report No 2 (London, HMSO).
  • GREEN, J.A. (1975) Teacher Made Tests, 2nd edn (London, Harper & Row).
  • HAkroG, P. & RHODES, E.G. (1936) The Marks of Examiners (London, Macmillan).
  • HYLAND, T. (1994) Competence, Education and NVQs: Dissenting Perspectives (London, Cassell Education).
  • JOLLY, B. (2000) "The Professor has submitted her questions and thus we may proceed to set the examination paper," Medical Education, 34, pp. 7–8.
  • KUISMA, R. (1999) Criteria referenced marking of written assignments, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, p. 27.
  • LADucA, A. (1994) Validation of professional licensure examinations: professions theory, test design, and construct validation, Evaluation and the Health Professions, 17, pp. 178–197.
  • MACNAMARA, J. & MADAUS, G.F. (1969) Marker reliability in the Irish leaving certificate, Irish journal of Education, 3, pp. 15–21.
  • MARSH, H.W. & IRELAND, R. (1987) The assessment of writing effectiveness: a multidimensional perspective, Australian Journal of Psychology, 39, pp. 353–367.
  • MYTCHELMORE, M.G. (1981) Reporting student achievement: how many grades?, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, pp. 218–227. MULHOLLAND, H. & MCALEER, S. (1988) Report to the Examination Board of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Dundee, Centre for Medical Education, unpublished.
  • MUNRO, N., RUGHANI, A., FOULKES, J., WILSON, A. & NEIGHBOUR, R. (2000) Assessing validity in written tests of general practice: exploration by factor analysis of candidate response patterns to paper 1 of the MRCGP examination, Medical Education, 34, pp. 35–41.
  • MURPHY, R.J.L. (1978) Reliability of marking in eight GCE examinations, British Journal of Education and Psychology, 48, pp. 196 200-44
  • MURPHY, R.J.L. (1982) A further report into the reliability of marking of GCE examinations, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, pp. 58–63.
  • NEWBLE, D.L. & EmrwisTLE, N.J. (1986) Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education, Medical Education, 20, pp. 162–175.
  • NoRom, J.J., SWANSON, D.B., GROSSO, L.J. et al. (1985) Reliability, validity and efficiency of various item formats in assessment of physician competence, Medical Education, 19, pp. 238–247.
  • Nur:TALL, D.L. & WILLmoTT, A.S. (1972) British Examinations: Techniques of Analysis P12 (Slough, NFER Publishing).
  • PILLINER, A.E.G. (1969) Estimation of number of grades to be awarded in one examination by consideration of its reliability coefficient, internal research paper, Godfrey Thompson Unit, Edinburgh.
  • RAFOTH, B.A. & RuBsr, D.L. (1984) The impact of content and mechanics on judgments of writing quality, Written communication, 1, pp. 446–458. SouTHGAIR, L. & GRANT, J. (2003) Principles and standards for an assessment system for postgraduate medical training, Joint Statement by Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board and Academy of the Medical Royal Colleges.
  • SWANSON, D.B. (1987) Review of membership examination procedures of the Royal College of General Practitioners, unpublished.
  • The General and Specialist Medical Practice (Education, Training and Qualifications) Order 2003, Statutory Instrument 2003 No. 1250.
  • VAN DER VLEUTEN, C.P.M. (1996) The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications, Advances in Health Science Education, 1, pp. 41–67.
  • VERMA, M., CHANTwAL, J. & SINGH, T. (1997) Reliability of essay type questions—effect of structuring, Assessment in Education, 4, pp. 265-270. WASS, V., MCGIBBON, D. & VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. (2001) Composite undergraduate examinations: how should components be combined to maximize reliability?, Medical Education, 35, pp. 326–330.
  • WwLmoTT, A.S. & NuaTALL, D.L. (1975) The reliability of examinations at 16+ (London, Macmillan Education Ltd).
  • WOOD, R. (1991) Assessment & Testing: A Survey of Research (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 144–145.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.