References
- Adamson TE, Bunch WH, Baldwin D.C., Jr, Oppenberg A. The virtuous orthopaedist has fewer malpractice suits. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 2000; 378: 104–109
- Ambady N, LaPlante D, Nguyen T, Rosenthal R, Chaumeton N, Levison W. Surgeons’ tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery 2002; 132: 5–9
- AssociationOf American Medical Colleges. Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Communication in Medicine. Medical School Objectives Project, Report III 1999. 1999. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC
- General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. GMC, London 2002
- Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, Sloan FA. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following peri-natal injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association 1992; 267: 1359–1363
- Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician–patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997a; 277: 553–559
- Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997b; 277: 553–559
- Makoul G. The SEGUE framework for teaching and assessing communication skills. Patient Education and Counselling 2001; 45: 23–34
- Makoul G. Segue: a framework for teaching and evaluating communication in medical encounters. 2002, Earlier version of paper sent to American Educational Research Association. Abstract
- Simpson JG, Furnace J, Crosby J, Cumming AD, Evans PA, Friedman B, David M, Harden RM, Lloyd D, McKenzie H, Mclachlan JC, McPhate GF, Percy-Robb IW, MacPherson SG. The Scottish doctor-learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate I Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Medical Teacher 2002; 24: 136–143
- Smee SM, Blackmore DE. Setting standards for an objective structured clinical examination: the borderline group method gains ground on Angoff. Medical Education 2001; 35: 1009–1010
- Wilkinson TJ, Newble DI, Frampton CM. Standard setting in an objective structure clinical examination: use of global ratings of borderline performance to determine the passing score. Medical Education 2001; 35: 1043–1049