1,513
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Web papers

‘Team observation’: a six-year study of the development and use of multi-source feedback (360-degree assessment) in obstetrics and gynaecology training in the UK

Pages e177-e184 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

References

  • Butterfield OS, Pearson JA. Nurses in resident evaluation: a qualitative study of the participants’ perspectives. Evaluation and the Health Professions 1990; 13: 453–473
  • Butterfield PS, Mazzaferri EL. A new rating form for use by nurses in assessing residents’ humanistic behaviour. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1991; 6: 155–161
  • Davidge AM, Hull AL. A system for the evaluation of medical students’ clinical competence. Journal of Medical Education 1990; 55: 65–67
  • Dawson-Saunders B, Paiva REA. The validity of clerkship performance evaluations. Medical Education 1986; 20: 240–245
  • Dielman TE, Hull AL, Davis WK. Psychometric properties of clinical performance ratings. Evaluation and the Health Professions 1980; 3: 103–117
  • General Medical Council. The New Doctor—Guidance on PRHO Training. General Medical Council, London 1994
  • General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. General Medical Council, London 2001
  • Linn BS. Performance self assessment. British Journal of Medical Education 1975; 9: 98–101
  • Maxim BR, Dielman TE. Dimensionality, internal consistency and interrrater reliability of clinical performance ratings. Medical Education 1987; 21: 130–137
  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE Response to the Report of the Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London 2001
  • Newble D, Paget N, McLaren B. Revalidation in Australia and New Zealand: approach of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. British Medical Journal (Intl edn) 1999; 319(7218)1185–1188
  • Norcini JJ. Recertification in the United States. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 1183–1185
  • Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Blank LL, Wenrich MD. Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians. Academic Medicine 1996; 71(4)364–370
  • Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson B, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 269: 1655–1660
  • Risucci DA, Tortolania AJ, Ward RJ. Ratings of surgical residents by self supervisors and peers. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1989; 169: 519–526
  • Simpson M, Buckman R, Stewart M. Doctor–patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. British Medical Journal 1991; 303: 1385–1387
  • Southgate L, Pringle M. Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 1180–1183
  • Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practising internists by hospital based registered nurses. Academic Medicine 1993; 68: 680–687
  • Whitehouse A, Walzman M, Wall D. Pilot study of 360 degree assessment of personal skills to inform record of in-training assessments for senior house officers. Hospital Medicine 2002; 63: 172–175
  • Whitehouse A, Hassell A, Wood L, Wall D, Walzman M, Campbell I. Development and reliability testing of TAB—a form for 360° assessment of senior house officers’ professional behaviour, as specified by the General Medical Council. Medical Teacher 2005; 27: 252–258
  • Wood L, Campbell I. 360 degree assessment: encouraging results of a 6 year study. Liverpool, UK 2004, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Medical Education
  • Woolliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP, Swanson DB. Resident–patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses. Academic Medicine 1994; 69(3)216–224
  • Lu YH, Meng XY, Lui X. Professional behaviour of medical school graduates: an analysis. Medical Education 1994; 28: 296–300

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.