Medical students’ attitudes to gender issues in the role and career of physicians: a qualitative study conducted in Sweden

References

• Åberg L. Lön efter kön–Vem bryr sig? (in Swedish) [Paid according to sex–who cares?]. Karolina 2001; 13: 4–7, (Paper for the Organisation of Swedish Female Physicians)
   Google Scholar
• Ash AS, Carr PL, Goldstein R, Friedman RH. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity?. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004; 141: 205–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel J. Gender equity is undergraduate medical education: a status report. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine 2001; 10: 261–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boulis A, Jacobs J, Veloski JJ. Career choice: glass ceiling or glass slipper? Gender segregation during medical school. Academic Medicine 2001; 76: s65–s67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies K. Distrurbing Gender: On the Doctor–Nurse Relationship. Department of Sociology, Lund University, LundSweden 2001
   Google Scholar
• Emmons SL, Adams KE, Nichols M, Cain J. The impact of perceived gender bias on obstetrics and gynecology skills acquisition by third-year medical students. Academic Medicine 2004; 79: 326–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field D, Lennox A. Gender in medicine: the views of first and fifth year medical students. Medical Education 1996; 30: 246–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamberg K. Genusperspektiv relevant för många av läkarutbildningens ämnen. Viktigt att betrakta män och kvinnor med helhetssyn (in Swedish with English abstract) [Gender perspective relevant in many medical school subjects. Essential to perceive men and women holistically]. Läkartidningen 2003; 100: 4078–4083
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henrich JB. Women's health education initiatives: why have they stalled?. Academic Medicine 2004; 79: 283–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs CD, Bergen MR, Korn D. Impact of a program to diminish gender insensitivity and sexual harassment at a medical school. Academic Medicine 2000; 75: 464–469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson C, Hensing G, Allebeck P. Sexual and gender-related harassment in medical education and research training: results from a Swedish survey. Medical Education 2003; 37: 39–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications, London 1985
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz L. Unmasking moral dichotomies: can feminist pedagogy overcome student resistance?. Gender and Education 2005; 17: 39–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis J. Male sweep of new award raises questions of bias. Science 2004; 306: 595
   Google Scholar
• Nora L, Mclaughlin M, Fosson S, Stratton T, Murphy–Spencer A, Fincher R, German D, Seiden D, Witzke D. Gender discrimination and sexual harassment in medical education: perspectives gained by a 14-school study. Academic Medicine 2002; 77(12 Pt 1)1226–1234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips S. Problem-based learning in medicine: new curriculum, old stereotypes. Social Science and Medicine 1997; 45: 497–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed V, Buddeberg-Fisher B. Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview. Medical Education 2001; 35: 139–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach L, Brown H. Gender and academic medicine: impacts on the health workforce. British Medical Journal 2004; 329: 792–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risberg G, Johansson EE, Westman G, Hamberg K. Gender in medicine–an issue for women only? A survey of physician teachers' gender attitudes. Journal for Equity in Health 2003, Available at: http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/2/1/10 (accessed 7 March 2006)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss A. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. Women and Men in Sweden. Facts and Figures 2004: Demographic Analysis and Gender Equality. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm 2004
   Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite J, Ewart B. Valuing diversity: helping medical students explore their attitudes and beliefs. Medical Teacher 2003; 25: 277–281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinklin T, Croxford L, Ducklin A, Barbara. F. Gender and attitudes to work and family roles: the views of young people at the millennium. Gender and Education 2005; 17: 129–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titus JJ. Engaging student resistance to feminism: 'How is this stuff going to make us better teachers?'. Gender and Education 2000; 12: 21–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonk P, Mans L, Lagro-Janssen A. Integrating gender into a basic medical curriculum. Medical Education 2005; 39: 118–1125
   Google Scholar
• Wainer J. Gender and the medical curriculum: a rural case study. Women & Health 2003; 37: 67–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wear D, Keck-Mcnulty C. Attitudes of female nurses and female residents toward each other: a qualitative study in one US teaching hospital. Academic Medicine 2004; 79: 291–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerås C, Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 1997; 387: 341–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerståhl A, Andersson M, Söderström M. Gender in medical curricula: course organizer views of a gender perspective in medicine in Sweden. Women & Health 2003; 37: 35–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelek B, Phillips SP. Gender and power: nurses and doctors in Canada. International Journal for Equity in Health 2003, BioMed Central. Available at: http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/2/1/1 (accessed 7 March 2006)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar