References
- Carrière B. Development and initial validation of a script concordance test for residents in a pediatric emergency medicine rotation. University of Illinois in Chicago. 2005, Thesis
- Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Van der Vleuten C. The Script Concordance Test, a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med 2000; 12: 189–195
- Charlin B, Van der Vleuten C. Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty: the script concordance approach. Eval Heal Prof 2004; 27: 304–319
- Charlin B, Gagnon R, Sauvé E, Coletti M, van der Vleuten C. Assessment of clinical reasoning: is it necessary to accept variability of answers within the panel of reference to detect clinical experience? Med Educ. 2006, forthcoming
- Gagnon R, Charlin B, Coletti M, Sauvé E, van der Vleuten C. Assessment in the context of uncertainty: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test?. Med Educ 2005; 39: 284–291
- Meterissian S, Zabolotny B, Gagnon R, Charlin B. Is the Script-concordance test a valid instrument for assessment of intra-operative decision-making skills?. American J Surg 2007; 4193: 248–251
- Lambert C. The script concordance test: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning of radiation oncology residents. University of Montreal. 2005, Thesis
- Norcini J, Shea J, Day S. The use of the aggregate scoring for a recertification examination. Evaluation in the Health Prof 1990; 13: 241–251
- Norman GR. Objective measurement of clinical performance. Med Educ 1985; 19: 43–47
- Roussel F, Sibert L, N’Guyen P, et al. Évaluation du raisonnement clinique au cours du troisième cycle de Médecine Générale par le Test de Concordance de Script: étude comparative de deux corrections. Communication at the Congrès de la Société Internationale Francophone d’Éducation Médicale. Beyrouth. 1–2 June, 2006
- Sibert L, Charlin B, Corcos J, Gagnon R, Grise P, van der Vleuten C. Stability of clinical reasoning assessment results with the script concordance test across two different linguistic, cultural and learning environments. Med Teach 2002; 24: 522–527