Meaningful learning: Students’ perceptions of a new form of case seminar in pathology

References

• Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Birkshire 1999
   Google Scholar
• How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. JD Bransford, AL Brown, RR Cocking. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 2000
   Google Scholar
• Cortright RN, Collins HL, DiCarlo SE. Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: Ability to solve novel problems. Adv Physiol Educ 2005; 29: 107–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey J. Democracy and education. Dover Publications, Inc, Mineola, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourgh P. What do you mean by collaborative learning?. Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, P Dillenbourgh. Elsevier, Oxford 1999; 1–19
   Google Scholar
• Dolmans DJM, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IAP, Van der Vleuten CM. Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Med Educ 2005; 39: 732–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DJM, Schmidt HG. What do we know about cognitive motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2006; 11: 321–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulay C. Learning pathology: Why? how? when?. J Clin Pathol 1997; 50: 623–624
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fyrenius A, Bergdahl B, Silèn C. Lectures in problem-based learning – Why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning. Med Teach 2005; 27: 61–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokhale AA. Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. J Tech Educ 1995; 7: 22–30
   Google Scholar
• Haidet P, O’Malley KJ, Richards B. An initial experience with “Team Learning” in medical education. Acad Med 2002; 77: 40–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM. Evolution or revolution and the future of medical education: Replacing the oak tree. Med Teach 2000; 22: 435–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein RM, Mann RJ, Walling AD. A thematic approach to enhance clinical content in a cell and tissue biology course. Acad Med 2002; 77: 1173–1174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koles P, Nelson S, Stolfi A, Parmelee D, Destephen D. Active learning in a year 2 pathology curriculum. Med Educ 2005; 39: 1045–1055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Indurkhya A, Nguyen H. Curricular trends in instruction of pathology: A nationwide longitudinal study from 1993 to present. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 1147–1153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach J, Scott P. Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Sci Educ 2003; 12: 91–113
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne S, Lonka K. Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment – Are they related to study success?. Learn Instr 1999; 9: 1–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Stud High Educ 2002; 27: 27–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka K, Lindblom-Ylänne S. Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. High Educ 1996; 31: 5–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall R, Cartwright N, Mattick K. Teaching and learning pathology: A critical review of the English literature. Med Educ 2004; 38: 302–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education, 3rd (Internet), F Marton, D Hounsell, N Entwistle. University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, Edinburgh 2005; 106–125, Available from: http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/EoL.html
   Google Scholar
• Mattick K, Knight L. High-quality learning: Harder to achieve than we think?. Med Educ 2007; 41: 638–644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauffette-Leenders LA, Erskine JA, Leenders MR. Learning with cases. Ivery Publishing, Richard Ivery School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario 1997
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. Rote versus meaningful learning. Theor Pract 2002; 41: 226–232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell HI, Michael JA, Adamson TA, Horwitz B. Enhancing active learning in the student laboratory. Adv Physiol Educ 2004; 28: 107–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton DP. Teaching for understanding: What it is and how to do it. Routledge Falmer, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Acad Med 1992; 67: 557–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey P, Zimitat C. Medical students’ learning of anatomy: Memorisation, understanding and visualisation. Med Educ 2007; 41: 7–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins D. The many faces of constructivism, Educ Leadership. Nov: 6–11, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Perkins DN, Salomon G. Transfer of learning, international encyclopedia of education, 2nd. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1994; 6452–6457
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele U. Interest, learning and motivation. Educ Psychol 1991; 26: 299–323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel CL, Richards BF. Application of team learning in a medical physiology course. Acad Med 2001; 76: 533–534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y. Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Med Educ 2004; 38: 286–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Snell L. Interactive lecturing: Strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Med Teach 1999; 19: 37–42
   Google Scholar
• Stjernquist M. Casemetodik – ny studentaktiv pedagogik i läkarutbildningen [The case method – A new student activating method for teaching and learning in medical education]. Läkartidningen 2001; 98: 174–176, (In Swedish)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, Gielen S. On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learn Instr 2006; 16: 279–294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Prosser M. Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. High Educ 1991; 22: 251–266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’. approaches to learning High Educ 1999; 37: 57–70
   Google Scholar
• Tärnvik A. Case-metodik – undervisningsform som engagerar [The case method – Teaching method that engages]. Läkartidningen 2004; 101: 3314–3319, (In Swedish)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermunt JD, Vermetten YJ. Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning and learning orientations. Educ Psychol Rev 2004; 16: 359–384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1978
   Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: Creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Med Educ 2005; 39: 107–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. It all makes sense: Biomedical knowledge, causal connections and memory in the novice diagnostician. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007a; 12: 405–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007b; 12: 417–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar