References
- Arksey H, O’Malley L. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 8:19–32. [Internet] Available from: http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/13645579/v08i0001/19_sstamf
- Basehore PM, Pomerantz SC, Gentile M. 2014. Reliability and benefits of medical student peers in rating complex clinical skills. Med Teach. 36:409–414. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889287
- Birenbaum M. 2003. New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In: Optimising new modes Assess search Qual Stand. New York: Springer; p. 13–36.
- Birenbaum M, DeLuca C, Earl L, Heritage M, Klenowski V, Looney A, Smith K, Timperley H, Volante L, Wyatt-Smith C. 2015. International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futur Educ. 13:117–140.
- Black P, McCormick R, James M, Pedder D. 2006. Learning how to learn and assessment for learning: a theoretical inquiry. Res Pap Educ. 21:119–132.
- Black P, Wiliam D. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ. 5:7–74.
- Brazeau C, Boyd L, Crosson J. 2002. Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: the making of a teaching OSCE. Acad Med. 77:932
- Broadfoot PM, Daugherty R, Gardner J, Harlen W, James M, Stobart G. 2002. Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Cambridge: UK Univ Cambridge Sch Educ.
- Brown S. 2004. Assessment for learning. Learn Teach High Educ. 1:81–89.
- Burgess A, Clark T, Chapman R, Mellis C. 2013. Senior medical students as peer examiners in an OSCE. Med Teach. 35:58–62.
- Carraccio C, Englander R. 2000. The objective structured clinical examination: a step in the direction of competency-based evaluation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 154:736–741. [Internet] Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.154.7.736
- Casey PM, Goepfert AR, Espey EL, Hammoud MM, Kaczmarczyk JM, Katz NT, Neutens JJ, Nuthalapaty FS, Peskin E. 2009. To the point: reviews in medical education—the objective structured clinical examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 200:25–34.
- Chenot J-F, Simmenroth-Nayda A, Koch A, Fischer T, Scherer M, Emmert B, Stanske B, Kochen MM, Himmel W. 2007. Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination? Med Educ. 41:1032–1038. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02895.x
- Clark I. 2010. Formative assessment: “There is nothing so practical as a good theory.” Aust J Educ. 54:341–352.
- Cushing A, Abbott S, Lothian D, Hall A, Westwood OMR. 2011. Peer feedback as an aid to learning–what do we want? Feedback. When Do We Want It? Now! Med Teach. 33:e105–e112.
- Cushing AM, Westwood OMR. 2010. Using peer feedback in a formative objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ. 44:1144–1145. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03832.x
- Davis Feickert JA, Harris IB, Anderson DC, Bland CJ, Allen S, Poland GA, Satran L, Miller WJ. 1992. Senior medical students as simulated patients in an objective structured clinical examination: motivation and benefits. Med Teach. 14:167–177.
- Dochy F, Segers M, Sluijsmans D. 1999. The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Stud High Educ. 24:331–350.
- Gipps CV. 1994. Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment. New York: Psychology Press.
- Gorman SL, Lazaro R, Fairchild J, Kennedy B. 2010. Development and Implementation of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Neuromuscular Physical Therapy. J Phys Ther Educ. 24:62. [Internet]. Available from: http://uwo.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwED6hTiwUyvulG2EI5J1uCFWp2IpoxVrZsSNAqVMQEYiFv47PsVEV1I01iRxbvnx3F3_3HUAUXvleBxPSRBScRSzzAxmnMZeUSHDSMg95LIOyo5nkmqTa3XYgaZBb1AX9NL8eJnFEVaPDm-WrR12k6LTVtdRgttWC0F90YGrQI-2stLlnD4-_QK0nYxi
- Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. 1975. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. BMJ. 1:447–451. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/1/5955/447.abstract
- Harris IB, Miller WJ. 1990. Feedback in an objective structured clinical examination by medical students serving as patients, examiners, and teachers. Acad Med. 65:433–434.
- Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 77:81–112.
- Hodges B, McNaughton N, Regehr G, Tiberius R, Hanson M. 2002. The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise. Med Educ. 36:742–748.
- Hodges B, Regehr G, McNaughton N, Tiberius R, Hanson M. 1999. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med. 74:1129–1134.
- Iblher P, Zupanic M, Karsten J, Brauer K. 2015. May student examiners be reasonable substitute examiners for faculty in an undergraduate OSCE on medical emergencies? Med Teach. 37:374–378. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0142159X.2014.956056
- Martin IG, Jolly B. 2002. Predictive validity and estimated cut score of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) used as an assessment of clinical skills at the end of the first clinical year. Med Educ. 36:418–425. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01207.x
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6:e1000097.
- Moineau G, Power B, Pion A-MJ, Wood TJ, Humphrey-Murto S. 2011. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE. Med Educ. 45:183–191. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03800.x
- Ogden GR, Green M, Ker JS. 2000. Student examiners: The use of interprofessional peer examiners in an objective structured clinical examination: can dental students act as examiners? Br Dent J. 189:160–164. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800711
- Quero Munoz L, O’Byrne C, Pugsley J, Austin Z. 2005. Reliability, validity, and generalizability of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for assessment of entry-to-practice in pharmacy. Pharm Educ. 5:33–43. [Internet]. Available from: 10.1080/15602210400025347
- Quick KK. 2016. The role of self- and peer assessment in dental students' reflective practice using standardized patient encounters. J Dent Educ. 80:924–929.
- Regehr G, Freeman R, Hodges B, Russell L. 1999. Assessing the generalizability of OSCE measures across content domains. Acad Med. 74:1320–1322.
- Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Nandagopal K, Eva KW. 2004. Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations?. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 9:189–199.
- Sluijsmans DMA, Joosten-ten Brinke D, Van der Vleuten CPM. 2013. Toetsen met leerwaarde. Een reviewstudie naar de effectieve kenmerken van formatief toetsen. Form assessment A Rev study Charact Form assessment, NWO, Den Haag.
- Tan CPL, Azila NMA. 2007. Improving OSCE examiner skills in a Malaysian setting. Med Educ. 41:517
- Topping K. 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev Educ Res. 68:249–276.
- Topping KJ. 1996. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: a typology and review of the literature. High Educ. 32:321–345.
- Townsend AH, Mcllvenny S, Miller CJ, Dunn EV. 2001. The use of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for formative and summative assessment in a general practice clinical attachment and its relationship to final medical school examination performance. Med Educ. 35:841–846. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00957.x
- van der Vleuten C, Sluijsmans D, Joosten-ten Brinke D. 2017. Competence assessment as learner support in education. In: Competence-based vocat prof educ. New York: Springer; p. 607–630.
- Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LKJ, van Tartwijk J. 2012. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 34:205–214.
- Walker N, Lefteri N, Kravitz L, Evans BW. 2014. Undergraduate MPharm students as Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) assessors: can this facilitate the learning. Int Jounral Pharm Pract. 22:23–106.
- Wallenstein J, Heron S, Santen S, Shayne P, Ander D. 2010. A Core Competency-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) can predict future resident performance. Acad Emerg Med. 17:S67–S71. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00894.x
- Watson R, Stimpson A, Topping A, Porock D. 2002. Clinical competence assessment in nursing: a systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 39:421–431. [Internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02307.x
- Wiliam D. 2011. What is assessment for learning?. Stud Educ Eval. 37:3–14.
- Young I, Montgomery K, Kearns P, Hayward S, Mellanby E. 2014. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE. Clin Teach. 11:214–218. [Internet]. Available from: http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/17434971/v11i0003/214_tboapmo
- Young TK. 2003. Review of research on aboriginal populations in Canada: relevance to their health needs. Bmj. 327:419–422.
- Zartman RR, McWhorter AG, Seale NS, Boone WJ. 2002. Using OSCE-based evaluation: curricular impact over time. J Dent Educ. 66:1323–1330.