How learning analytics can early predict under-achieving students in a blended medical education course

References

• About Open Tracking|MailChimp.com: KB Article. Available from: http://kb.mailchimp.com/reports/about-open-tracking
   Google Scholar
• Agudo-Peregrina AF, Iglesias-Pradas S, Conde-Gonzalez MA, Hernandez-Garcia A. 2014. Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Comput Human Behav. 31:542–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghasham A, Saqr M, Kamal H. 2013. Using learning analytics to evaluate the efficacy of blended learning in pbl based medical course. AMEE 2013 Conference at Prague Congress Centre; 2013 Aug 24–28; Prague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold KE, Pistilli MD. 2012. Course signals at purdue. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge – LAK; 2012 29 April–2 May; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard J, Butler PI. 2016. Learner enhanced technology. J Appl Rese HE. 8:18–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. 2005. Statistics review 14: logistic regression. Crit Care. 9:112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M. 2011. Learning analytics: the coming third wave. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative Brief . [cited 2016 Jan 24]. Available from: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/elib1101.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conde MÁ, Hernández-García Á. 2015. Learning analytics for educational decision making. Comput Human Behav. 47:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Benito J, Therón R, García-Peñalvo FJ, Pizarro Lucas E. 2015. Discovering usage behaviors and engagement in an Educational Virtual World. Comput Human Behav. 47:18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom E, Brooks DC, Bichsel J. 2014. The current ecosystem of learning management systems in higher education: student, faculty, and IT perspectives. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Dean J. 2014. Big data, data mining, and machine learning: value creation for business leaders and practitioners. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; p. 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty I, Sharma N, Harbutt D. 2014. Contemporary and future eLearning trends in medical education. Med Teach. 37:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellaway R, Masters K. 2008. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 30:455–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellaway RH, Pusic MV, Galbraith RM, Cameron T. 2014. Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education. Med Teach. 36:216–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falakmasir MH, Habibi J. 2010. Using educational data mining methods to study the impact of virtual classroom in e-learning. The 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining; Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson R. 2012. Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. IJTEL. 4:304.
   Google Scholar
• Filippou J, Cheong C, Cheong F. 2015. Designing persuasive systems to influence learning: modelling the impact of study habits on academic performance. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS); Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan C, Morris LV, Lee K. 2008. Differences by course discipline on student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses of undergraduate general education. J Coll Stud Retent Res Theory Prac. 10:39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gandomi A, Haider M. 2014. Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. Int J Inform Manage. 35:137–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaševi D, Dawson S, Siemens G. 2015. Let’s not forget: learning analytics are about learning course signals: lessons learned. Tech Trends 59:64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gašević D, Dawson S, Rogers T, Gasevic D. 2016. Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High Educ. 28:68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gönen M. 2006. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. SAS Users Group International (SUGI). 31:210–231.
   Google Scholar
• Howard E, Meehan M, Parnell A. 2016. Developing accurate early warning systems via data analytics [Journal]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05735
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. 2016. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 18:e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockyer L, Heathcote E, Dawson S. 2013. Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am Behav Scient. 57:1439–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfadyen LP, Dawson S. 2010. Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: a proof of concept. Comput Educ. 54:588–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfadyen LP, Dawson S. 2012. Numbers are not enough. Why e-learning analytics failed to inform an institutional strategic plan. Educat Technol Soc. 15:149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodle plugins directory: Analytics Graphs [Internet]. [cited 2014 Feb 2]. Available from: https://moodle.org/plugins/block_analytics_graphs
   Google Scholar
• Moodle plugins directory: Attendance Register [Internet]. [cited 2014 Feb 2]. Available from: https://moodle.org/plugins/mod_attendanceregister
   Google Scholar
• Moodle plugins directory: Configurable Reports [Internet]. [cited 2014 Feb 2]. Available from: https://moodle.org/plugins/block_configurable_reports
   Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ. 2003. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ. 37:464–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill LD, Wallstedt B, Eika B, Hartvigsen J. 2011. Factors associated with dropout in medical education: a literature review. Med Educ. 45:440–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzarasa P, Kujawski B, Hammond EJ, Roberts CM. 2016. Temporal patterns and dynamics of e-learning usage in medical education. Educ Tech Res Dev. 64:13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papamitsiou ZK, Economides AA. 2014. Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: a systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educat Technol Soc. 17:49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng C-yJ, Lee KL, Ingersoll GM. 2002. An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. J Educat Res. 2:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistilli MD, Arnold KE. 2010. In practice: purdue signals: mining real-time academic data to enhance student success. About Campus. 15:22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Qassim College of Medicine. 2014. Qassim College of Medicine Privacy Policy and User Agreement. 3rd ed. [Internet]. [cited 2014 June 2]. Available from: http://qumed.org/code.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ramos C, Yudko E. 2008. “Hits” (not “Discussion Posts”) predict student success in online courses: a double cross-validation study. Comput Educ. 50:1174–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards G. 2011. Measuring engagement: learning analytics in online learning. Electr Kazan 2011; 2011 Apr 19; Kazan, Russian Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Rienties B, Boroowa A, Cross S, Kubiak C, Mayles K, Murphy S. 2016. Analytics4Action evaluation framework: a review of evidence-based learning analytics interventions at the Open University UK. J Interact Media Educ. 2016:11.
   Google Scholar
• Shea P, Hayes S, Smith SU, Vickers J, Bidjerano T, Gozza-Cohen M, Jian S-B, Pickett A, Wilde J, Tseng C-H. 2013. Online learner self-regulation: learning presence viewed through quantitative content-and social network analysis. IRRODL. 14:427–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens G. 2013. Learning analytics: the emergence of a discipline. Am Behav Scientist. 57:1380–1400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Shneiderman B, Milic-Frayling N, Mendes Rodrigues E, Barash V, Dunne C, Capone T, Perer A, Gleave E. Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies; 2009: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Stegers-Jager KM, Themmen APN, Cohen-Schotanus J, Steyerberg EW. 2015. Predicting performance: relative importance of students’ background and past performance. Med Educ. 49:933–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekian A, Norcini J. 2015. Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment. GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. 32:Doc43.
   Google Scholar
• Tempelaar DT, Rienties B, Giesbers B. 2015. In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: learning analytics in a data-rich context. Comput Human Behav. 47:157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaitsis C, Nilsson G, Zary N. 2014. Big data in medical informatics: improving education through visual analytics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 205:1163–1167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velleman PF, Hoaglin DC. 2012. Exploratory data analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ, editors. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 3: data analysis and research publication. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association. p. 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wise AF, Shaffer DW. 2015. Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. JLA. 2:5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff A, Zdrahal Z, Herrmannova D, Kuzilek J, Hlosta M. 2014. Developing predictive models for early detection of at-risk students on distance learning modules; 2014 Mar 24?28; The 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK14); Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff A, Zdrahal Z, Nikolov A, Pantucek M. 2013. Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge; Leuven, Belgium. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H. 2013. The case for being automatic: introducing the automatic linear modeling (LINEAR) procedure in SPSS statistics. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints. 39:27–37.
   Google Scholar