1,542
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The adaptive medical curriculum: A model for continuous improvement

&

References

  • Arnold KM, McDermott KB. 2013. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 39:940–945.
  • Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RI. 2009. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA. 302:1330.
  • Brame DJ, Biel R. 2015. Test-enhanced learning: the potential for testing to promote greater learning in undergraduate science courses. LSE. 14:es4–e12.
  • Brown, Ajufo, Cone, Quirk. 2018. LectureKeeper: a novel approach to studying in the adaptive curriculum. Med Teach.
  • Carney P, Mejicano G, Quirk M. 2018. Assessing learning in the adaptive curriculum. Med Teach.
  • Chang EK, Wimmers PF. 2017. Effect of repeated/spaced formative assessments on medical school final exam performance. Science Direct Health Prof Educ. 3:32–37.
  • Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J, McKinstry B. 2008. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice. Med Teach. 30:124–145.
  • Croskerry P. 2018. Adaptive expertise in medical decision-making. Med Teach.
  • Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. 2006. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 296:1094–1102.
  • Deane RP, Murphy DJ. 2013. Student attendance and academic performance in undergraduate obstetrics/gynecology clinical rotations. JAMA. 310:2282–2288.
  • Deslauriers L, Schelew E, Wieman C. 2011. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science. 332:862–864.
  • Groen JF, Quigley B, Herry Y. 2016. Examining the use of lecture capture technology: implications for teaching and learning. CJSoTL. 7:1.
  • Gruppen LD, White C, Fitzgerald JT, Grum CM, Woolliscroft JO. 2000. Medical students' self-assessments and their allocations of learning time . Acad Med. 75:374–379.
  • Hafferty FW, Gaufberg EH. 2017. The hidden curriculum. In: Dent J, Harden RM, Hunt D, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. London (UK): Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; p. 52–60.
  • Harden RM. 2009. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Med Teach. 23:123–137.
  • Heen S, Stone D. 2014. Find the coaching in criticism. HBR. 92: 108–111.
  • Larsen DP, Butler AC, Lawson AL, Roediger HL. 2013. The importance of seeing the patient: test-enhanced learning with standardized patients and written tests improves clinical application of knowledge. Adv Health Sci Educ. 18:409–425.
  • McDaniel MA, Wildman KM, Anderson JL. 2012. Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: an experimental study. Appl Res Mem Cogn. 1:18–26.
  • Mirza K. 2018. Stricht school of medicine.
  • Meyer ER, Notebaert AJ, Perkins E, Lynch JC, Simpson KL. 2016. Does lecture attendance matter? A study of exam performance in medical neurobiology. FASEB. 30:569.10.
  • Paul S, Pusic M, Gillespie C. 2015. Medical student lecture attendance versus iTunes. Med Educ. 49:530–541.
  • Prober CG, Heath C. 2012. Lecture halls without lectures. N Engl J Med366:1657–1659.
  • Quirk M. 2006. Intuition and metacognition in medical education: keys to developing expertise. New York (NY): Springer Publishing Company.
  • Quirk ME, Harden RM. 2017. Curriculum planning and development. In: Dent J Harden RM, Hunt D, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. London (UK): Elsevier.
  • Shaw J. 2015. Rethinking the medical curriculum. Harvard Magazine Sept-Oct, 17–24.
  • Schuwirth L, Ash J. 2013. Assessing tomorrow's learners: in competency-based education only a radically different holistic method of assessment will work. Six things we could forget. Med Teach. 35:555–559.
  • Smith MA, Karpicke JD. 2014. Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests. Memory. 22:784–802.
  • Weinstein Y, McDermott KB, Roediger HL. III. 2010. A comparison of study strategies for passages: rereading, answering questions, and generating questions. J Exp Psychol Appl. 16:308–316.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.