Do we really need cadavers anymore to learn anatomy in undergraduate medicine?

References

• Böckers A, Jerg-Bretzke L, Lamp C, Brinkmann A, Traue HC, Böckers TM. 2010. The gross anatomy course: an analysis of its importance. Anat Sci Educ. 3:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohl M, Bosch P, Hildebrandt S. 2011. Medical students’ perceptions of the body donor as a “first patient” or “teacher": a pilot study. Anat Sci Educ. 4:208–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinnah TI, De Bere SR, Collett T. 2011. Students' views on the impact of peer physical examination and palpation as a pedagogic tool for teaching and learning living human anatomy. Med Teach. 33:e27–e36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clunie L, Morris NP, Joynes VCT, Pickering JD. 2018. How comprehensive are research studies investigating the efficacy of technology-enhanced learning resources in anatomy education? A systematic review. Am Assoc Anatomists. 11:303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Collett T, McLachlan JC. 2005. Does ‘doing art’ inform students’ learning of anatomy? Med Educ. 39:521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett T, McLachlan JC, Kirvell D, Nakorn A. 2009. The role of living models in the teaching of surface anatomy: some experiences from a UK Medical School. Med Teach. 31:e90–e96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett TC, McLachlan JC. 2006. Evaluating a poetry workshop in medical education. Med Humanit. 32:59–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. 2010. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg. 80:212–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custers EJ. 2010. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 15:109–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer GS, Thorndike ME. 2000. Quidne Mortui Vivos Docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Acad Med. 75:969–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler E, Serowy S, Link K, Filgueira L. 2018. Experience from an optional dissection course in a clinically-oriented concept to complement system-based anatomy in a reformed curriculum. Am Assoc Anatomists. 11:32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Evans DJR, Watt DW. 2005. Provision of anatomical teaching in a new British medical school: Getting the right mix. Anat Rec B New Anat. 284:22–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finn G, McLachlan JC. 2010. A qualitative study of student responses to body painting. Anat Sci Educ. 3:33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming K, McLachlan JC, Finn G, Ludlow A. 2010. FLEX + PLY textile metaphors for anatomy. An Exhibition. http://uir.ulster.ac.uk/24156/
   Google Scholar
• Fruhstorfer BH, Palmer J, Brydges S, Abrahams PH. 2011. The use of plastinated prosections for teaching anatomy-The view of medical students on the value of this learning resource. Clin Anat. 24:246–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habicht JL, Kiessling C, Winkelmann A. 2018. Bodies for anatomy education in medical schools: an overview of the sources of cadavers worldwide. Acad Med. 1. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafferty FW. 1988. Cadaver stories and the emotional socialization of medical students. J Health Soc Behav. 29:344–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper G. 1993. Breaking taboos and steadying the self in medical school. Lancet. 342:913–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikah DSK, Finn GM, Swamy M, White PM, McLachlan JC. 2015. Clinical vignettes improve performance in anatomy practical assessment. Am Assoc Anatomists Educ. 8:221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Jain N, Youngblood P, Hasel M, Srivastava S. 2017. An augmented reality tool for learning spatial anatomy on mobile devices. Clin Anat. 30:736–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, Wainman B. 2013. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 6:211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuper A, D'Eon M. 2011. Rethinking the basis of medical knowledge. Med Educ. 45:36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder D. 1992. A tale of two bodies. In: Leder D, editor. The Body in Medical Thought and Practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud A, Bennett M. 2015. Introducing 3-Dimensional printing of a human anatomic pathology specimen: Potential benefits for undergraduate and postgraduate education and anatomic pathology practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 139:1048–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan JC. 2004. New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection. Anat Rec B New Anat. 281:4–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLachlan JC, Regan de Bere S. 2004. How do we teach anatomy without cadavers?. Clinical Teacher. 1:49–52.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan JC, Patten D. 2006. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 40:243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, Adams JW. 2014. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ. 7:479–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty JA, Sonntag B, Sinacore JM. 2009. Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six-year study. Anat Sci Educ. 2:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxham B, McHanwell S, Plaisant O, Pais D. 2015. A core syllabus for the teaching of neuroanatomy to medical students. Clin Anat. 28:706–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nnodim JO. 1990. Learning human anatomy: By dissection or from prosections? Med Educ. 24:389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlina W, Drake RL. 2010. Anatomical Sciences Education: a partner on the road to scholarship in teaching and learning. Anat Sci Educ. 3:1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering JD. 2017. Developing the evidence-base to support the integration of technology-enhanced learning in healthcare education. Medscieduc. 27:903–905.
   Google Scholar
• Prober CG, Khan S. 2013. Medical education reimagined: a call to action. Acad Med. 88:1407–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CE, Bradley P, Collett T, McLachlan JC. 2005. “Over my dead body?”: the influence of demographics on students' willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Med Teach. 27:599–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reifler DR. 1996. “I actually don't mind the bone saw”: narratives of gross anatomy . Lit Med. 15:183–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. 2006. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when? Anat Rec B New Anat. 289:215–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins BD, Tomaka A, Innus C, Patterson J, Styn G. 2008. Lessons from the dead: the experiences of undergraduates working with cadavers. Omega (Westport). 58:177–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltarelli AJ, Roseth CJ, Saltarelli WA. 2014. Human cadavers vs. multimedia simulation: A study of student learning in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 7:331–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer K. 2004. Becoming a physician: teaching anatomy in the digital world. N Engl J Med. 351:1279–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CF, Finn GM, Stewart J, Mchanwell S. 2016. Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine: The Delphi process. J Anat. 228:2–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CF, Tollemache N, Coville D, Johnston M. 2018. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 6:385–392.
   Google Scholar
• Trelease RB. 2016. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ. 9:583–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubbs RS, Sorenson EP, Sharma A, Benninger B, Norton N, Loukas M, Moxham BJ. 2014. The development of a core syllabus for the teaching of head and neck anatomy to medical students. Clin Anat. 27:321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner V. 1977. Variations on a theme of liminality. In: Moore SF, Myerhoff BG, editors. Secular ritual. van Gorcum, Assen, pp. 36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Turney BW. 2007. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 89:104–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vanGennep A. 1909. Les Rites de passage: Étude systématique des rites de la porte et du seuil, de l'hospitalité, de l'adoption, de la grossesse et de l'accouchement, de la naissance, de l'enfance, de la puberté, de l'initiation, de l'ordination, du couronnement, des fiançailles et du mariage, des funérailles, des saisons, etc. Nourry, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Miller C, Klein B, Taylor M, Goodwin M, Boyle E, Brown K, Hoppe C, Lazarus M. 2017. A 50 year review and meta-analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies. FASEB J. 31:392–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AB, Miller CH, Klein BA, Taylor MA, Goodwin M, Boyle EK, Brown K, Hoppe C, Lazarus M. 2018. A meta‐analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies. Clin Anat. 31:122–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmann A, Güldner FH. 2004. Cadavers as teachers: the dissecting room experience in Thailand. BMJ. 329:1455–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager VL. 1996. Learning gross anatomy: dissection and prosection. Clin Anat. 9:57–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar