Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Teacher Volume 40, 2018 - Issue 11: BEST PRACTICE FOR ASSESSMENT
Submit an article Journal homepage
7,754
Views
157
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

2018 Consensus framework for good assessment

John NorciniFAIMER, PhiladelphiaPA, USA; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8464-4115View further author information
ORCID Icon,
M. Brownell AndersonNBME, PhiladelphiaPA, USA; View further author information
,
Valdes BollelaSchool of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil; View further author information
,
Vanessa BurchGroote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur, Cape Town, South Africa; View further author information
,
Manuel João CostaSchool of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5255-4257View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Robbert DuvivierParnassia Psychiatric Institute,Maastricht University, Hague, The Netherlands; View further author information
,
Richard HaysRural Clinical School, University of Tasmania, Burnie, Australia; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-3134View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Maria Felisa Palacios MackayCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; View further author information
,
Trudie RobertsMedical Education Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; View further author information
&
David SwansonABMS, Chicago, IL, USAORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-944XView further author information
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1102-1109 | Published online: 09 Oct 2018

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. 2014. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): American Educational Research Association.
  • Biggs J. 2014. Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Rev High Educ. 1:5–22.
  • Clarke MM. 2012. What matters most for student assessment systems: a framework paper. Working Paper no 1. Systems Approach for Better Education Results (SABER). Washington (DC): World Bank.
  • Dijkstra J, Galbraith R, Hodges BD, McAvoy PA, McCrorie P, Southgate LJ, van der Vleuten CP, Wass V, Schuwirth LW. 2012. Expert validation of fit-for-purpose guidelines for designing programmes of assessment. BMC Med Educ. 12:20.
  • Ellaway RH, Pusic MV, Galbraith RM, Cameron T. 2014. Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education. Med Teach. 36:216–222.
  • Hodges B, McIlroy JH. 2003. Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training. Med Educ. 37:1012–1016.
  • Institutional Research and Effectiveness Office, St. Olaf College. Assessment of Student Learning. [accessed 2018 Jun 17]. https://wp.stolaf.edu/ir-e/assessment-of-student-learning-2/
  • Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 6:42.
  • National Research Council. 2001. Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences.
  • National Research Council. 2014. Developing Assessment for the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press.
  • Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V et al. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33:206–214.
  • Office of Academic Planning and Assessment, University of Massachusetts Amherst. 2001. Program-Based Review and Assessment. [accessed 2018 Jun 17]. https://www.umass.edu/oapa/sites/default/files/pdf/handbooks/program_assessment_handbook.pdf.
  • Patterson F, Zibarras LD. 2011. Exploring the construct of perceived job discrimination in selection. Int J Select Assess. 19:251–257.
  • Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, Centeno A, Mccrorie P, Mcmanus C, Patterson F, Powis D, Tekian A, Wilkinson D. 2011. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33:215–223.
  • Pusic MV, Triola MM. 2017. Determining the optimal place and time for procedural education. BMJ Qual Safety. 11:863–865.
  • Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. 2011. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 33:478–485.
  • Van Der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Govaerts MJB, Heeneman S. 2015. Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Med Teach. 37:641–646.
  • Wilkinson TJ. 2007. Assessment of clinical performance: gathering evidence. Intern Med J. 37:631–636.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.