Interdisciplinary expertise in medical practice: Challenges of using and producing knowledge in complex problem-solving

References

• Abu-Rish E, Kim S, Choe L, Varpio L, Malik E, White AA, Craddick K, Blondon K, Robins L, Nagasawa P, et al. 2012. Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: a literature review. J Interprof Care. 26:444–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acquavita SP, Lewis MA, Aparicio E, Pecukonis E. 2014. Student perspectives on interprofessional education and experiences. J Allied Health. 43:e31–e36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersen H. 2013. The second essential tension: on tradition and innovation in interdisciplinary research. Topoi. 32:3–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen H. 2016. Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science. Stud Hist Philos Sci A. 56:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandiera G, Kuper A, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead C, Ruetalo M, Kulasegaram K, Woods NN. 2018. Back from basics: integration of science and practice in medical education. Med Educ. 52:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker EA, Schell KS. 2017. Understanding, facilitating, and researching interprofessional education. Respir Care. 62:999–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon M. 2012. Scientific concepts in the engineering sciences: epistemic tools for creating and intervening with phenomena. In: Feest U, Steinle F, editors. Scientific concepts and investigative practice. Berlin (Germany): De Gruyter; p. 219–243.
   Google Scholar
• Boon M. 2017a. Philosophy of science in practice: a proposal for epistemological constructivism. In: Leitgeb H, Niiniluoto I, Seppälä P, Sober E, editors. Logic, methodology and philosophy of science—Proceedings of the 15th International Congress (CLMPS 2015). Helsinki (Finland): College Publications; p. 289–310.
   Google Scholar
• Boon M. 2017b. An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: knowledge as epistemic tool. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 129:25–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon M. 2019. Scientific methodology in the engineering sciences. Chapter 4. In: Michelfelder D, Doorn N, editors. Routledge handbook of philosophy of engineering. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boon M, Knuuttila T. 2009. Models as epistemic tools in engineering sciences: a pragmatic approach. In: Meijers A, editor. Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Handbook of the philosophy of science. Vol. 9. North-Holland: Elsevier; p. 687–720.
   Google Scholar
• Boon M, Van Baalen SJ. Forthcoming. Epistemology for interdisciplinary research–shifting philosophical paradigms of science. Eur J Philos Sci. doi:10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell KB, Stalmeijer RE, Könings KD, Segers M, van Merriënboer JJ. 2014. How experts deal with novel situations: a review of adaptive expertise. Educ Res Rev. 12:14–29. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo J-M, Park YS, Harris I, Cheung JJH, Sood L, Clark MD, Kulasegaram K, Brydges R, Norman G, Woods N. 2018. A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education. Med Educ. 52:592–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, Moulton CA, Ringsted CV, Brydges R. 2018. Knowing how and knowing why: testing the effect of instruction designed for cognitive integration on procedural skills transfer. Adv Health Sci Educ. 23:61–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi MTH. 2006. Two approaches to the study of expert's characteristics. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich P, Hoffman R, editors. Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Choi BC, Pak AW. 2007. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clin Inevest Med. 30:224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark PG. 2004. Institutionalizing interdisciplinary health professions programs in higher education: The implications of one story and two laws. J Interprof Care. 18:251–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Witt CB. Jr. 1996. Some historical notes on interdisciplinary and interprofessional education and practice in health care in the USA. J Interprof Care. 10:173–187.
   Google Scholar
• DeZure D. 2010. Interdisciplinary pedagogies in higher education. In: Frodeman R, editor. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; p. 372–387.
   Google Scholar
• Dyre L, Tolsgaard MJ. 2018. The gap in transfer research. Med Educ. 52(6):580–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, et al. 2010. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 376:1923–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert JH, Yan J, Hoffman SJ. 2010. A WHO report: framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. J Allied Health. 39:196–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goddiksen M, Andersen H. 2014. Expertise in interdisciplinary science and education. Retrieved from: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11151/
   Google Scholar
• Goldszmidt M, Minda JP, Devantier SL, Skye AL, Woods NN. 2012. Expanding the basic science debate: the role of physics knowledge in interpreting clinical findings. Adv Health Sci Educ. 17:547–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatano G, Inagaki K. 1986. Two courses of expertise. In: Stevenson H, Azuma H, Hakuta K, editors. Child Development and Education in Japan. New York, NY: WH Freeman; p. 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson JN, Croker A. 2018. Educating for collaborative practice: an interpretation of current achievements and thoughts for future directions. Med Educ. 52:114–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanitskaya L, Clark D, Montgomery G, Primeau R. 2002. Interdisciplinary learning: process and outcomes. Innov High Educ. 27:95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Kant I. 1781/1999. Critique of pure reason. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khushf G. 1999. The aesthetics of clinical judgment: exploring the link between diagnostic elegance and effective resource utilization. Med Health Care Philos. 2:141–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim JH, Lee C. 2001. Implications of near and far transfer of training on structured on-the-job training. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 3(4):442–451.
   Google Scholar
• Knebel E, Greiner AC. 2003. Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington (DC): National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram KM, Chaudhary Z, Woods N, Dore K, Neville A, Norman G. 2017. Contexts, concepts and cognition: principles for the transfer of basic science knowledge. Med Educ. 51:184–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram K, Manzone JC, Ku C, Skye A, Wadey V, Woods NN. 2015a. Cause and effect: testing a mechanism and method for the cognitive integration of basic science. Acad Med. 90:S63–S69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead CR, Woods NN. 2013. Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med. 88:1578–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram K, Min C, Howey E, Neville A, Woods N, Dore K, Norman G. 2015b. The mediating effect of context variation in mixed practice for transfer of basic science. Adv Health Sci Educ. 20:953–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajoie SP. 2009. Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship model: examples from avionics and medicine. In: Ericksson K. A., editor. Development of professional expertise: toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; Chapter 3, p. 61–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlis TR, Anson J, Greenfield D. 2014. Barriers and enablers that influence sustainable interprofessional education: a literature review. J Interprof Care. 28:305–310. doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.895977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN. 2016. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect Med Educ. 5:147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN. 2017. Examining the effect of self-explanation on cognitive integration of basic and clinical sciences in novices. Adv Health Sci Educ. 22:1071–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourdel N, Gondran N, Laforest V, Debray B, Brodhag C. 2007. Sustainable development cognitive map: a new method of evaluating student understanding. Int J High Educ. 8:170–182.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod M. 2016. What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice. Synthese. 1:24.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod M, Nersessian NJ. 2013. Coupling Simulation and Experiment: The Bimodal Strategy in Integrative Systems Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 44(4, Part A):572–584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Borschel D(T), O’Brien T, Martimianakis S, Woods NN. 2017. Exploring integration in action: competencies as building blocks of expertise. Acad Med. 92:1794–1799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Kulasegaram K, Woods NN. 2018. Developing the experts we need: fostering adaptive expertise through education. J Eval Clin Pract. 24:674–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. 2007. Cognitive metaphors of expertise and knowledge: prospects and limitations for medical education. Med Educ. 41:1159–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. 2011. Putting the expert together again. Med Educ. 45:920–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Scardamalia M. 2008. Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: Implications for knowledge building in health care. Med Educ. 42:975–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Woods N. 2014. Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction. Med Educ. 48:667–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Woods NN. 2009. Having our cake and eating it too: seeking the best of both worlds in expertise research. Med Educ. 43:406–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe M, Henderson A, Chick R. 2017. Defining a set of common interprofessional learning competencies for health profession students. Med Teach. 39:463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palonen T, Boshuizen HP, Lehtinen E. 2014. How expertise is created in emerging professional fields. In: Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning. Berlin (Germany): Springer; p. 131–149.
   Google Scholar
• Procee H. 2006. Reflection in education: a Kantian epistemology. Educ Theor. 56:237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz DL, Bransford JD, Sears D. 2005. Efficiency and innovation in transfer. Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. p. 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader S, Zaudke J. 2018. Top ten best practices for interprofessional precepting. J Interprof Educ Pract. 10:56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Van Baalen SJ, Boon M. 2015. An epistemological shift: from evidence-based medicine to epistemological responsibility. J Eval Clin Pract. 21:433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Baalen SJ, Boon M. 2017. Evidence-based medicine versus expertise—knowledge, skills, and epistemic actions. In: Bluhm R, editor. Knowing and acting in medicine. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield; p. 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Van Baalen S, Leemans A, Dik P, Lilien MR, Ten Haken B, Froeling M. 2017. Intravoxel incoherent motion modeling in the kidneys: comparison of mono-, bi-, and triexponential fit. J Magn Reson Imaging. 46:228–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN. 2007. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 41:1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. 2007a. It all make sense: biomedical knowledge, causal connections and memory in the novice diagnostician. Adv Health Sci Educ. 12:405–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. 2007b. The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases. Adv Health Sci Educ. 12:417–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Mylopoulos M. 2015a. How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: from processing to preparation. Med Educ. 49:952–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Mylopoulos M. 2015b. On clinical reasoning research and applications: redefining expertise. Med Educ. 49:543–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods NN, Neville AJ, Levinson AJ, Howey EHA, Oczkowski WJ, Norman GR. 2006. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis. Acad Med. 81:S124–S127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2010a. Medical devices: managing the mismatch. An outcome of the Priority Medical Devices project. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. ISBN 978 92 4 156404 5. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2010b. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Available from: http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/
   Google Scholar
• Zohar A, Barzilai S. 2013. A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Stud Sci Educ.49:121–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar