Predatory journals: Do not judge journals by their Editorial Board Members

References

• Beall J. 2013. Medical publishing triage - chronicling predatory open access publishers. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2:47–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beall J. 2016a. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 98:77–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall J. 2016b. Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2:115–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beall J. 2017. What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 27:273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger M, Cirasella J. 2015. Beyond Beall's list: better understanding predatory publishers. CRLN. 76:132–135.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon J. 2013. Who's afraid of peer review? Science. 342:60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler D. 2013. Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature. 495:433–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabezas-Clavijo A, Delgado-Lopez-Cozar E. 2013. Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment. Med Intensiva. 37:343–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark AM, Thompson DR. 2017. Five (bad) reasons to publish your research in predatory journals. J Adv Nurs. 73:2499–2501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadkhah M, Bianciardi G. 2016. Ranking predatory journals: solve the problem instead of removing it! Adv Pharm Bull. 6:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadkhah M, Borchardt G. 2016. Hijacked journals: an emerging challenge for scholarly publishing. Aesthet Surg J. 36:739–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadkhah M, Lagzian M, Borchardt G. 2017. Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review. J Cell Commun Signal. 11:181–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danevska L, Spiroski M, Donev D, Pop-Jordanova N, Polenakovic M. 2016. How to recognize and avoid potential, possible, or probable predatory open-access publishers, standalone, and hijacked journals. Pril.(Makedon.Akad.Nauk Umet.Odd.Med.Nauki). 37:5–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. 2008. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. Faseb J. 22:338–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen T. 2017. Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers. Scientometrics. 113:1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Yessirkepov M, Endovitskiy DA, Voronov AA, Kitas GD. 2017. Researcher and author profiles: opportunities, advantages, and limitations. J Korean Med Sci. 32:1749–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Duisenova A, Trukhachev VI, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. 2018. Researcher and author impact metrics: variety, value, and context. J Korean Med Sci. 33:e139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gorin SV, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. 2016. Statement on publication ethics for editors and publishers. J Korean Med Sci. 31:1351–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guraya SY, Norman RI, Khoshhal KI, Guraya SS, Forgione A. 2016. Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: a systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies. Pak J Med Sci. 32:1562–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez FR, Beall J, Forero DA. 2015. Spurious alternative impact factors: the scale of the problem from an academic perspective. Bioessays. 37:474–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansoti B, Langdorf MI, Murphy LS. 2016. Discriminating between legitimate and predatory open access journals: report from the international federation for emergency medicine research committee. West J Emerg Med. 17:497–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch JE. 2005. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:16569–16572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalalian M, Mahboobi H. 2013. New corruption detected: bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations. Electron Physician. 5:685–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kebede M, Schmaus-Klughammer AE, Tekle BT. 2017. Manuscript submission invitations from 'predatory journals': what should authors do? J Korean Med Sci. 32:709–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinert S, Wager E. 2014. Responsible research publication: international standards for editors. Pril.(Makedon.Akad.Nauk Umet.Odd.Med.Nauki). 35:35–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozak M, Bornmann L. 2012. A new family of cumulative indexes for measuring scientific performance. PLoS One. 7:e47679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine C, Winker MA. 2017. Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 27:285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manca A, Cugusi L, Dvir Z, Deriu F. 2017. PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion. Lancet. 390:734–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manca A, Martinez G, Cugusi L, Dragone D, Dvir Z, Deriu F. 2017. The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology. Neuroscience. 353:166–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon AR. 2018. Predatory journals spamming for publications: what should researchers do? Sci Eng Ethics. 24(5):1617–1639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Cobey KD, Lalu MM, Galipeau J, Avey MT, Ahmadzai N, Alabousi M, Barbeau P, Beck A, et al. 2017. Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature. 549:23–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munk P, Coupal TM, Peh WC. 2018. A shift in scholarly publishing practices and the growing menace of predatory journals. Med J Aust. 209:149–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richtig G, Berger M, Lange-Asschenfeldt B, Aberer W, Richtig E. 2018. Problems and challenges of predatory journals. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 32(9):1441–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, Turner L, Barbour V, Burch R, et al. 2017. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A Cross-Sectional Comparison. BMC Med. 15:28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver A. 2017. A controversial website that lists 'predatory' publishers shuts down. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2017.21328
   Google Scholar
• Singer A, Murphy L, Hansoti B, Langdorf M. 2017. Not all young journals are predatory. West J Emerg Med. 18:318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokowski P, Kulczycki E, Sorokowska A, Pisanski K. 2017. Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature. 543:481–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva JA. 2017. The ethical and academic implications of the Jeffrey beall (www.scholarlyoa.com) blog shutdown. Sci Eng Ethics. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9905-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva JA, Al-Khatib A. 2016. How are editors selected, recruited and approved? Sci Eng Ethics. 23(6):1801–1804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucha C. 2015. Predatory publishing: what authors, reviewers, and editors need to know. Biol Res Nurs. 17:5–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar