Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Teacher Volume 41, 2019 - Issue 9
Submit an article Journal homepage
731
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of tablet-scoring and immediate score sheet review on validity and educational impact in an internal medicine residency Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE)

Vijay J. DanielsDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6350-3129View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Alicia C. StrandDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5664-6802View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Hollis LaiSchool of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5531-6622View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Tracey HillierDepartment of Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4545-7720View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 1039-1044 | Published online: 26 May 2019

References

  • Ashby SE, Snodgrass SH, Rivett DA, Russell T. 2016. Factors shaping e-feedback utilization following electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examinations. Nurs Health Sci. 18:362–369.
  • Brown CW. 2016. Tablet- or iPAD-based marking of OSCEs and MMIs: an imaginative cost-saving approach. Med Teach. 38:211–212.
  • Currie GP, Sinha S, Thomson F, Cleland J, Denison AR. 2017. Tablet computers in assessing performance in a high stakes exam: opinion matters. J R Coll Phys Edinb. 47:164–167.
  • Denison A, Bate E, Thompson J. 2016. Tablet versus paper marking in assessment: feedback matters. Perspect Med Educ. 5:108–113.
  • Harrison CJ, Molyneux AJ, Blackwell S, Wass VJ. 2015. How we give personalised audio feedback after summative OSCEs. Med Teach. 37:323–326.
  • Hochlehnert A, Schultz JH, Möltner A, Tımbıl S, Brass K, Jünger J. 2015. Electronic acquisition of OSCE performance using tablets. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 32:Doc41.
  • Humphrey-Murto S, Mihok M, Pugh D, Touchie C, Halman S, Wood TJ. 2016. Feedback in the OSCE: What do residents remember? Teach Learn Med. 28:52–60.
  • IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • Judd T, Ryan A, Flynn E, McColl G. 2017. If at first you don't succeed … adoption of iPad marking for high-stakes assessments. Perspect Med Educ. 6:356–361. Oct
  • Kane MT. 2013. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. J Educ Meas. 50:1–73.
  • Kirkpatrick D. 1967. Evaluation of training. In: Craig R, Bittel L, editors. Training and development handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 131–167.
  • Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Mann KV, Custers E, Ten Cate O. 2012. Have motivation theories guided the development and reform of medical education curricula? A review of the literature. Acad Med. 87:735–743.
  • Monteiro S, Sibbald D, Coetzee K. 2018. i-Assess: evaluating the impact of electronic data capture for OSCE. Perspect Med Educ. 7:110–119.
  • Moreau KA. 2017. Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox? Med Teach. 39:999–1001.
  • Munro AJ, Cumming K, Cleland J, Denison AR, Currie GP. 2018. Paper versus electronic feedback in high stakes assessment. J R Coll Phys Edinb. 48:148–152.
  • Ohyama A, Nitta H, Shimizu C, Ohara A, Araki K, Kuro- saki N, Mataki S. 2005. Educative effect of feedback after medical interview in objective structured clinical examination. J Stomatolsoc Jpn. 72:71–76.
  • Patrício MF, Julião M, Fareleira F, Carneiro AV. 2013. Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education? Med Teach. 35:503–514.
  • Schut S, Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Heeneman S. 2018. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment. Med Educ. 52:654–663.
  • Van Der Vleuten CP. 1996. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1:41–67.
  • Yardley S, Dornan T. 2012. Kirkpatrick's levels and education 'evidence'. Med Educ. 46:97–106.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.