The lecture-free curriculum: Setting the stage for life-long learning: AMEE Guide No. 135

References

• Alizadeh M, Mirzazadeh A, Parmelee DX, Peyton E, Mehrdad N, Janani L, Shahsavari H. 2018. Leadership identity development through reflection and feedback in team-based learning medical student teams. Teach Learn Med. 30(1):76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizadeh M, Parmelee D, Overman I, AlJasem M. 2019. Preparing learners for learning in the engaged learning classroom. MedEdPublish. 8(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows HT. 1980. Problem-based learning. An approach to medical education. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bate E, Hommes J, Duvivier R, Taylor D. 2014. Problem-based learning (PBL): getting the most out of your students - their roles and responsibilities: AMEE Guide No. 84. Med Teach. 36(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland LK, Schwarz CV, Krist C, Kenyon L, Lo AS, Reiser BJ. 2016. Epistemologies in practice: making scientific practices meaningful for students. J Res Sci Teach. 53(7):1082–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges NJ, Kirkham K, Deardorff AS, Moore JA. 2012. Development of emotional intelligence in a team-based learning internal medicine clerkship. Med Teach. 34(10):802–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzetti J, Gisondi MA, Hopson LR, Regan L. 2019. Aiming beyond competent: the application of the taxonomy of significant learning to medical education. Teach Learn Med. 31(4):466–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown PC, Roediger HL, McDaniel MA. 2014. Make it stick: the science of successful learning. Cambridge (MA): Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Bleasel J, Haq I, Roberts C, Garsia R, Robertson T, Mellis C. 2017. Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL? BMC Med Educ. 17(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo J, Park YS, Harris I, Cheung JJH, Sood L, Clark MD, Kulasegaram K, Brydges R, Norman G, Woods N. 2018. A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education. Med Educ. 52(6):592–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch CH, Mazur E. 2001. Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys. 69(9):970–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck CS. 2017. The journey to children’s mindsets–and beyond. Child Dev Perspect. 11(2):139–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckleberry-Hunt J, Lick D, Hunt R. 2018. Is medical education ready for generation Z? J Grad Med Educ. 10(4):378–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emanuel EJ. 2020. The inevitable reimaging of medical education. J Am Med Assoc. 323(12):e1–e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink D. 2013. Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco (CA): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Frank P. 1947. Einstein: his life and times. Rosen G, translator; Kusaka S, editor. New York (NY): Alfred A. Knopf; p. 185. German.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111(23):8410–8415. [accessed 2019 May 2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24821756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hejri SM, Mirzazadeh A, Khabaz MM, Alizadeh M, Saleh N, Gandomkar R, Jalili M. 2018. A decade of reform in medical education: experiences and challenges at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Med Teach. 40(5):472–480.
   Google Scholar
• Hew KF, Lo CK. 2018. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay Mctighe B, Wiggins G. 2012. Understanding by design® framwork introduction: what is UbDTM framework? [accessed 2019 May 2]. https://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kang S. 2016. Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: policy implications for instruction. Policy Insights from Behav Brain Sci. 3(1):12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke JD. 2012. Retrieval-based learning: active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 21(3):157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight JK, Wise SB, Southard KM. 2013. Understanding clicker discussions: student reasoning and the impact of instructional cues. CBE Life Sci Educ. 12(4):645–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh G-H, Khoo HE, Wong ML, Koh D. 2008. The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review. CMAJ. 178(1):34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead CR, Woods NN. 2013. Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med. 88(10):1578–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram K, Min C, Ames K, Howey E, Neville A, Norman G. 2012. The effect of conceptual and contextual familiarity on transfer performance. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 17(4):489–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL. 2009. Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 43(12):1174–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur E. 1997. Peer instruction: a user’s manual. Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mennenga HA. 2013. Student engagement and examination performance in a team-based learning course. J Nurs Educ. 52(8):475–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen LK, Parmelee DX, McMahon KK, editors. 2008. Team-based learning for health professions education. New York (NY): Sterling.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne JF, Henderson JB, MacPherson A, Szu E, Wild A, Yao SY. 2016. The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. J Res Sci Teach. 53(6):821–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. 2012. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Med Teach. 34(5):e275–e287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler H, Mcdaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R. 2008. Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 9(3):105–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roediger HL, Pyc MA. 2012. Inexpensive techniques to improve education: applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 1(4):242–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas I. 2009. Learning progressions in science education: two approaches for development. learn progress. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA. http://www.education.msu.edu/projects/leaps/proceedings/Default.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Rajalingam P, Low-Beer N. 2019. Knowledge reconsolidation. Acad Med. 94(12):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw G, Crippen KJ, Hartley K. 2006. Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Res Sci Educ. 36(1–2):111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemiller C, Grace M. 2017. Generation Z: educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus. 22(3):21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sheakley ML, Bauler LD, Tanager CL, Newby D. 2019. Student perceptions of a novel approach to promote professionalism using peer evaluation in a team-based learningTM setting: a quality improvement project. MedSciEduc. 29(4):1229–1232.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DC, Hamdy H. 2013. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 35(11):e1561–e1572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Custers EJFM ,Durning SJ, editors. 2018. What is clinical reasoning? In: Principles and practice of case-based clinical reasoning education. Cham (CH): Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• ten Cate TJ, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. 2011. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59. Med Teach. 33(12):961–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas PA, Bowen CW. 2011. A controlled trial of team-based learning in an ambulatory medicine clerkship for medical students. Teach Learn Med. 23(1):31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson BM, Haidet P, Borges NJ, Carchedi LR, Roman BJB, Townsend MH, Butler AP, Swanson DB, Anderson MP, Levine RE. 2015. Team cohesiveness, team size and team performance in team-based learning teams. Med Educ. 49(4):379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson BM, Levine RE, Kennedy F, Naik AD, Foldes CA, Coverdale JH, Kelly PA, Parmelee D, Richards BF, Haidet P. 2009. Evaluating the quality of learning-team processes in medical education: development and validation of a new measure. Acad Med. 84(10 Suppl):S124–S127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versteeg M, van Blankenstein FM, Putter H, Steendijk P. 2019. Peer instruction improves comprehension and transfer of physiological concepts: a randomized comparison with self-explanation. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 24(1):151–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickrey T, Rosploch K, Rahmanian R, Pilarz M, Stains M. 2015. Research-based implementation of peer instruction: a literature review. CBE Life Sci Educ. 14(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieman CE. 2014. Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111(23):8319–8320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Romero C, Paunesku D, Hulleman CS, Schneider B, Hinojosa C, Lee HY, O’Brien J, Flint K, Roberts A, et al. 2016. Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: the case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. J Educ Psychol. 108(3):374–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Ding L, Mazur E. 2016. Peer Instruction in introductory physics: a method to bring about positive changes in students’ attitudes and beliefs. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res. 13(1):010104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar